Assessing the Influence of Levels of Education and Contact on Public Attitudes Towards Ex-Offenders


Authors : Katrina Angela C. Matias; Jonelle M. Calaguas; Naidine L. Manalo; Dominic M. Dockery; Dr. Rhem Rick N. Corpuz

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 1 - January


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/32hexvb4

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/y7ec8dyz

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14637087


Abstract : Recidivism, which is the possibility of offenders reoffending, was mostly influenced by how the community perceived them. Negative attitudes towards offenders influenced the development of policy restrictions and barriers for ex-offenders in areas such as education, employment, health, housing, and voting rights. In this study, we aimed to investigate the significant relationship between levels of education and contact with ex-offenders, and public attitude. Understanding the indicators impacting public attitude was significant in light of the growing interest in rehabilitation and social reintegration programs. Using a quantitative research methodology, specifically a correlational design, provided for a thorough evaluation of these factors without requiring experimental modification. It allowed for the detection of relationships and patterns within the data, which improved the reliability and validity of the results. This study intended to provide reliable information into the complicated social dynamics underlying attitudes toward ex-offenders by surveying 384 participants. The study used Pearson's correlation coefficient to determine whether there was a relationship between levels of education and contact influencing public attitudes towards ex-offenders. Findings revealed that the study found no significant correlation between levels of education and contact, and attitudes towards ex-offenders. A multifaceted approach incorporating social, psychological, and environmental influences was essential for fostering positive societal attitudes toward ex-offenders. Finally, the purpose of this research was to influence policy and intervention measures targeted at increasing societal understanding and acceptance of individuals with a criminal history.

Keywords : Educational Level; Level of Contact; Attitude; Ex-Offenders; Explicit Attitude; Labeling Theory; Stigma.

References :

  1. Abrah, P. B. (2019). Labeling theory and life stories of juvenile delinquents transitioning into adulthood. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 63(2), 179-197.
  2. Albright, S., & Denq, F. (1996). Employer attitudes toward hiring ex-offenders. The Prison Journal, 76(2), 118-137.
  3. Alvarez, P., García-Carrión, R., Puigvert, L., Pulido, C., & Schubert, T. (2018). Beyond the walls: The social reintegration of prisoners through the dialogic reading of classic universal literature in prison. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 62(4), 1043-1061.
  4. Ambrose, T. (2023, July 3). Ex-offenders could help cut UK labour shortages, says report. The Guardian. Retrieved April 15, 2024, from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/jul/03/ex-offenders-could-help-cut-uk-labour-shortages-says-report
  5. Antwi, A. (2016). Rehabilitation of offenders in Ghana: A study of Nsawam medium security prison. Ghana Social Science Journal, 13, 124-148.
  6. Batur, S. C., & Akbaş, G. (2023). Attitudes Toward Ex-Prisoners (ATEP) Scale: A Scale Development and Validation Study. International Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR), 10(100), 2593-2603.
  7. Benard, A. K., Msomba, G., & Pesha, J. (2023). Social Challenges Facing Ex-Prisoners During Their Intergration into Societies in Iringa Municipality, Tanzania. Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 21(3), 78-89.
  8. Bernburg, J. G. (2019). Labeling theory. Handbook on crime and deviance, 179-196.
  9. Bernburg, J. G. (2009). Labeling Theory. no. June.
  10. Bhandari, P. (2021, July 7). Correlational Research | When & How to Use. Scribbr. Retrieved January 10, 2025, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/correlational-research/
  11. Bidola, V. R., De Leon, R., Ignacio, E., Mori, M. J., Valdez, S. N., & Bernabe, J. (2024). Life After Bars: A Narrative-Case Study of Ex-convicts. American Journal of Human Psychology, 2(1), 22-32.
  12. Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., Stavraki, M. (2019). Structure and function of attitudes. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia. Oxford University Press. DOI: 0.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.320
  13. Brislin, Richard W. (1968). Contact as a Variable in Intergroup Interaction. The Journal of Social Psychology, 76(2), 149–154. doi:10.1080/00224545.1968.9933606
  14. Boissevain, J., & Mitchell, J. C. (Eds.). (2018). Network analysis: Studies in human interaction. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
  15. Chan, K. (2022, May 9). Harms of Positive Stereotypes. Verywell Mind. Retrieved May 3, 2024, from https://www.verywellmind.com/harms-of-positive-stereotypes-5270456
  16. Charlesworth, T. E., & Banaji, M. R. (2022). Patterns of implicit and explicit attitudes: IV. Change and stability from 2007 to 2020. Psychological Science, 33(9), 1347-1371.
  17. Kernsmith, P. D., Comartin, E., Craun, S. W., & Kernsmith, R. M. (2009). The relationship between sex offender registry utilization and awareness. Sexual Abuse, 21(2), 181-193.
  18. Davis, L. M., Bozick, R., Steele, J. L., Saunders, J., & Miles, J. N. V. (2013). A Meta-analysis of programs that provide education to incarcerated adults. Rand Corporation: Santa Monica, CA, USA.
  19. De Guzman, A. B., Valdez, L. P., Henson, C. P., Gumba, R. E., & Fradejas, F. V. (2020). So near and yet so far: A grounded theory study of incarcerated Filipino elderly’s experiences of emotional geography. Educational Gerontology, 46(4), 235-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2020.1726648
  20. Dhillon, I. (2023). Measuring the Influence of personal narrative in changing perceptions of prisoners.
  21. EBP Society. (2018, January 30). Employment & Recidivism | Unemployment Recidivism. EBP Society. Retrieved April 15, 2024, from https://www.ebpsociety.org/blog/education/297-employment-recidivism
  22. Fair, H., & Walmsley, R. (2021), Prison populations continue to rise in many parts of the world, new report published by the Institute for Crime & Justice Policy Research shows.
  23. Feingold, Z. R. (2021). The stigma of incarceration experience: A systematic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 27(4), 550.
  24. Felbab-Brown V (2018) ‘In Nigeria, we Don’t Want Them Back’: Amnesty, Defectors’ Programmes, Leniency Measures, Informal Reconciliation, and Punitive Responses to Boko Haram. Tokyo, Japan: United Nations University, pp. 1–6.
  25. Griffith, J. N., Rade, C. B., & Anazodo, K. S. (2019). Criminal history and employment: an interdisciplinary literature synthesis. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 38(5), 505-528.
  26. Glock, S., & Kleen. H. (2020). Preservice teachers’ attitudes, attributions, and stereotypes: Exploring the disadvantages of students from families with low socioeconomic status. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67, 1-9.
  27. Gul, R. 2018. An Analysis Of The Pre And Post Release Services To The Prisoners And Its Impact On Their Reintegration (A Case Study Of Selected Prisons Of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal, 54(1).
  28. Hong, J. W., Hong, A. J., & Kim, S. R. (2021). Exploring implicit and explicit attitudes of employees’ authentic organizational loyalty. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 666869.
  29. Ike, T. J., Singh, D., Jidong, D. E., Murphy, S., & Ayobi, E. E. (2021). Rethinking reintegration in Nigeria: Community perceptions of former Boko Haram combatants. Third World Quarterly, 42(4), 661-678.
  30. Ike, T. J., Jidong, D. E., Ike, M. L., & Ayobi, E. E. (2023). Public perceptions and attitudes towards Fex-offenders and their reintegration in Nigeria: A mixed-method study. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 17488958231181987.
  31. Ishola, A. A. 2022. Family support, duration of incarceration and inmates’ intent to return to crime in Agodi Prison, Ibadan, Nigeria. Social Sciences, Humanities and Education Journal (SHE Journal), 3(1), pp. 31-39.
  32. Jones, C., & Narag, R. (2019). How inmates help run Philippine prisons. Current History, 118(811), 298-303. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Clarke Jones/publication/336778786_How_Inmates_Help_Run_Philippine_Prisons/links/5ebc96 b9458515626ca 7ec97/How-Inmates-Help-Run-Philippine-Prisons. pdf
  33. Keene, D. E., Smoyer, A. B., & Blankenship, K. M. (2018). Stigma, housing and identity after prison. The Sociological Review, 66(4), 799–815. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026118777447
  34. Khasni, F. N., Keshminder, J. S., & Chuah, S. C. (2021). Hiring ex-offenders: An application of theory of planned behaviour. Journal of International Business, Economics and Entrepreneurship, 6(1), 78-86.
  35. Khasni, F. N., Keshminder, J. S., Chuah, S. C., & Ramayah, T. (2023). A theory of planned behaviour: perspective on rehiring ex-offenders. Management Decision, 61(1), 313-338.
  36. Lawal, S. O. (2023). Investigating how different stakeholder perspectives in organisational narrative communication influence individuals’ implicit attitudes, explicit attitudes, intentions, and behaviours towards communicated issues (Doctoral dissertation, University of Reading).
  37. Liem, M., & Weggemans, D. (2018). Reintegration among high-profile ex-offenders. Journal of developmental and life-course criminology, 4, 473-490.
  38. Liu, L., and Visher, C. A. 2021. Decomposition of the role of family in reentry: Family support, tension, gender, and reentry outcomes. Crime and Delinquency, 67(6-7), pp. 970-996.
  39. Maruna, S. (2020). Beyond recidivism: New approaches to research on prisoner reentry and reintegration. NYU Press. https://books.google.com.ph/books?id=eAS5DwAAQBAJ&lpg=PA1&ots=aGITiGrOkl& dq=The%20challenge%20of%20inmate%20reentry%20and%20-%20recidivism%20in%20the%20US.&lr&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q=The%20challenge%20of%20inmate%20reentry%20and%20-%20recidivism%20in%20the%20US.&f=false
  40. Martinussen, L. M., Petranca, L., & Sømhovd, M. J. (2018). The relationship between explicit and implicit attitudes towards drunk driving. Plos one, 13(10), e0206124.
  41. McColgan, F., & Mugford, H. (2018). Desistance narratives and desistance processes: A critical review. European Journal of Criminology, 15(1), 111-132.
  42. Mosser, S. T. (2022). Factors Influencing Attitudes Towards Ex-Offenders (Doctoral dissertation, Northern Michigan University).
  43. Muschalik, C., Elfeddali, I., Candel, M. J., Crutzen, R., & de Vries, H. (2019). Does the discrepancy between implicit and explicit attitudes moderate the relationships between explicit attitude and (intention to) being physically active?. BMC psychology, 7, 1-14.
  44. Narag, R. E., & Jones, C. R. (2017). Understanding prison management in the Philippines:  A  case  for  shared  governance. The  Prison  Journal, 97(1), 3-26.
  45. Nayfeld, N. (2022). The varieties of attitudes towards offenders. Criminal Justice Ethics, 41(2), 95-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2022.2101591
  46. Nickerson, C. (2023, October 10). Recidivism: Definition, Causes & Examples. Simply Psychology. Retrieved May 3, 2024, from https://www.simplypsychology.org/recidivism.html
  47. Nugent, B., & Schinkel, M. (2016) ‘The Pains of Desistance’ Criminology & Criminal Justice [advanced online access]: 1-17.
  48. Obatusin, O., & Ritter-Williams, D. (2019). A phenomenological study of employer perspectives on hiring ex-offenders. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1), 1571730.
  49. Onsat, D., & Breva Jr, D. (2023). Factors Affecting Recidivism of Persons Deprived of Liberty at Tabaco City District Jail. JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research, 52(1), 1-12.
  50. Peka, S. (2021). Explicit and Implicit Attitudes towards Prisoners: The Impact of Level of Contact.
  51. Phillips, N. D. (2017). Violence, media effects, and criminology. In Oxford research encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice.
  52. Quinn-Hogan, A. N. (2021). The stain of a criminal label: Post-release stigmatization and its effects on reintegration and recidivism among ex-offenders.
  53. Rade, C. B., Desmarais, S. L., & Mitchell, R. E. (2016). A meta-analysis of public attitudes toward ex-offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(9), 1260-1280.
  54. Rade, C. B., Desmarais, S. L., & Burnette, J. L. (2018). An integrative theoretical model of public support for ex-offender reentry. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 62(8), 2131-2152.
  55. Rade, C. B., Desmarais, S. L., & Burnette, J. L. (2018). Implicit theories of criminal behavior: Fostering public support for ex-offender community reentry. Applied psychology in criminal justice, 14(1), 14-36.
  56. Recidivism Rates by Country 2024. (n.d.). World Population Review. Retrieved May 3, 2024, from https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/recidivism-rates-by-country
  57. Roberts, J. (2018). Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice. Routledge.
  58. [58] Sakib, S. N. (2022). AN EXPLORATION OF BARRIERS TO OFFENDER REINTEGRATION: PROBATION AND PRISON OFFICER OPINIONS VS PUBLIC OPINION.
  59. Sandhu, H. S., Arora, A., Brasch, J., & Streiner, D. L. (2019). Mental health stigma: explicit and implicit attitudes of Canadian undergraduate students, medical school students, and psychiatrists. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 64(3), 209-217.
  60. Schnappauf, E. M., & DiDonato, T. E. (2017). From solitary to solidarity: Belonging, social support, and the problem of women’s recidivism. Modern Psychological Studies, 23(1), 7.
  61. Schneider, C. R., & Weber, E. U. (2020). Reducing discrimination and fostering prosociality towards ex‐prisoners in Nigeria and the United States. Journal of Social Issues, 76(1), 172-199.
  62. Shamooil, D. (2022). Factors that Contribute to Attitudes Toward Ex-Offenders and Tendency to Hire Them (Doctoral dissertation, The Chicago School of Professional Psychology).
  63. Smith, C. D. (2021). Exploring the Employability of Ex-Offenders: Employer Perspectives (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
  64. Smith, J. (2023, July 6). Ex-Prisoners Face Headwinds as Job Seekers, Even as Openings Abound. The New York Times. Retrieved April 15, 2024, from https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/06/business/economy/jobs-hiring-after-prison.html
  65. Statistics Canada. (2021, September 29). Educational attainment of person. Retrieved January 10, 2025, from https://www23.statcan.gc.ca/imdb/p3Var.pl? Function=DEC&Id=85134
  66. Tenorio, N., Janer, C. J., & Manaig, L. J. (2019). Exploring the Lives of the Families of Ex-offenders. LPU-Laguna Journal of Arts and Sciences, 3(2), 1-1.
  67. Tuschick, E., Carthy, N., Wager, N., & Chamberlain, M. (2024). A qualitative systematic review of the barriers and facilitators of the reintegration of men convicted of a sexual offense from prison or secure care into the community. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15248380241254080.
  68. Wertheimer-Meier, J. (2023). Housing Discrimination and Negative Attitudes Towards Ex-Offender Parents (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln).
  69. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2019). Crime Prevention & Criminal Justice Module 6 Key Issues: 1. Introducing the aims of punishment, imprisonment and the concept of prison reform. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Retrieved May 3, 2024, from https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/crime-prevention-criminal-justice/module-6/key-issues/1--introducing-the-aims-of-punishment--imprisonment-and-the-concept-of-prison-reform.html
  70. Warren, C. (2023). The Negative Effect of Criminal Labeling on Community Reentry in the Harrisonburg Area.
  71. Western, B. (2018). Homeward: Life in the year after prison. Russell Sage Foundation. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azy049
  72. Wolfson, L., Schmidt, R. A., Stinson, J., & Poole, N. (2021). Examining barriers to harm reduction and child welfare services for pregnant women and mothers who use substances using a stigma action framework. Health & Social Care in the Community, 29(3), 589-601.
  73. Van Slyke, S. (2009). Social identification and public opinion on white-collar crime.
  74. Velásquez, P. (2023). Higher education and the evolution of prejudice (Doctoral dissertation, Umeå universitet).
  75. Veselý, A. (2021). Autonomy of policy instrument attitudes: concept, theory and evidence. Policy Sciences, 54(2), 441-455.
  76. Vivares, K. M. S., & Cuevas Jr, J. F. The Reintegration of Ex-Convicts in Society: A Case Study.
  77. Yukhnenko, D., Farouki, L., & Fazel, S. (2023). Criminal recidivism rates globally: A 6-year systematic review update. Journal of criminal justice, 88, 102115.
  78. Yukhnenko, D., Sridhar, S., & Fazel, S. (2019). A systematic review of criminal recidivism rates worldwide: 3-year update. Wellcome Open Research, 4.
  79. Zhang, C. (2023). The Effect of social media on Individuals’ Perception and Criminal Behavior. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 22, 843-847.

Recidivism, which is the possibility of offenders reoffending, was mostly influenced by how the community perceived them. Negative attitudes towards offenders influenced the development of policy restrictions and barriers for ex-offenders in areas such as education, employment, health, housing, and voting rights. In this study, we aimed to investigate the significant relationship between levels of education and contact with ex-offenders, and public attitude. Understanding the indicators impacting public attitude was significant in light of the growing interest in rehabilitation and social reintegration programs. Using a quantitative research methodology, specifically a correlational design, provided for a thorough evaluation of these factors without requiring experimental modification. It allowed for the detection of relationships and patterns within the data, which improved the reliability and validity of the results. This study intended to provide reliable information into the complicated social dynamics underlying attitudes toward ex-offenders by surveying 384 participants. The study used Pearson's correlation coefficient to determine whether there was a relationship between levels of education and contact influencing public attitudes towards ex-offenders. Findings revealed that the study found no significant correlation between levels of education and contact, and attitudes towards ex-offenders. A multifaceted approach incorporating social, psychological, and environmental influences was essential for fostering positive societal attitudes toward ex-offenders. Finally, the purpose of this research was to influence policy and intervention measures targeted at increasing societal understanding and acceptance of individuals with a criminal history.

Keywords : Educational Level; Level of Contact; Attitude; Ex-Offenders; Explicit Attitude; Labeling Theory; Stigma.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe