Authors :
Mudambi Geoffrey; Davis Matovu; Andrew Lukyamuzi; Richard Angole; Andrew Alunyu Egwar
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/34cft6x2
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/yzep3s95
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr1196
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
The study is to investigate wireless network forensics tools and institutional readiness at Busitema University. The
research aims to evaluate the availability, effectiveness, and deployment of existing wireless forensic tools, as well as the
university’s preparedness to handle cyber incidents involving wireless networks. Using a mixed-methods approach
comprising interviews with ICT personnel, system audits, and analysis of network infrastructure the study identifies critical
gaps in the deployment and use of wireless forensics technologies. Findings indicate limited utilization of advanced forensic
tools such as Wireshark, Aircrack-ng, and Kismet; inadequate staff training in wireless evidence handling; and the absence
of structured policies guiding forensic investigations. Furthermore, the University lacks a dedicated digital forensics
laboratory and a standardized incident response framework for wireless-related breaches. The study concludes that while
Busitema University has foundational ICT infrastructure, its forensic readiness remains low. Recommendations include
capacity building, acquisition of specialized wireless forensic tools, formulation of institutional policies, and establishment
of a centralized digital forensics laboratory to enhance security and investigative capabilities.
Keywords :
Wireless Network Forensics, Forensic Readiness, Cybersecurity, Digital Forensics Tools, Incident Response, ICT Infrastructure.
References :
- Bedi, P., Kumar, R., & Sharma, A. (2023). Advances in wireless network forensics and security analytics. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 212, 103567.
- Kumar, S., & Singh, R. (2023). Wireless forensics frameworks for intrusion detection in academic networks. IEEE Access, 11, 86532–86547.
- Mirembe, R., Katumba, A., & Namusoke, J. (2023). Cybersecurity readiness in Ugandan universities: Gaps and opportunities. African Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 1–15.
- Ndiwalana, A., & Kituyi, G. M. (2022). Challenges of implementing network security in higher education institutions in developing countries. International Journal of Information Security Research, 12(4), 230–241.
- Al-Kasassbeh, M., & Alshar’e, M. (2022). Wireless Network Forensics: Frameworks, Tools, and Readiness Assessment Models. Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, 17(3), 45–58.
- Baryamureeba, V., & Tushabe, F. (2004). The Enhanced Digital Investigation Process Model. Proceedings of the Digital Forensics Research Workshop (DFRWS).
- Casey, E. (2020). Digital Evidence and Computer Crime: Forensic Science, Computers, and the Internet. Academic Press.
- Kent, K., Chevalier, S., Grance, T., & Dang, H. (2006). Guide to Integrating Forensic Techniques into Incident Response (NIST SP 800-86).
- NIST (2021). Guide to Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (SP 800-94).
- NIST (2022). Computer Security Incident Handling Guide (SP 800-61 Rev.2).
- Palmer, G. (2001). A Road Map for Digital Forensics Research. Technical Report DTR-T001-01.
- Rowlingson, R. (2004). A Ten-Step Process for Forensic Readiness. International Journal of Digital Evidence, 2(3), 1–28.
- Busitema University (2023). Master of Science in Computer Forensics Curriculum Outline.
- Wireshark Foundation. (2024). Wireshark Documentation. https://www.wireshark.org
- Kismet Wireless. (2024). Kismet Documentation. https://www.kismetwireless.net
- R. Ahmed and R. V. Dharaskar, “Mobile forensics: An introduction from indian law enforcement perspective,” in Proc. Third International Conference on Information Systems, Technology and Management (ICISTM 2009), 2009, pp. 173–184.
- K. Restino. (2012, Jun.) Android expected to reach its peak this year as mobile phone shipments slow, according to idc. [Online]. Available: ttp://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS23523812
The study is to investigate wireless network forensics tools and institutional readiness at Busitema University. The
research aims to evaluate the availability, effectiveness, and deployment of existing wireless forensic tools, as well as the
university’s preparedness to handle cyber incidents involving wireless networks. Using a mixed-methods approach
comprising interviews with ICT personnel, system audits, and analysis of network infrastructure the study identifies critical
gaps in the deployment and use of wireless forensics technologies. Findings indicate limited utilization of advanced forensic
tools such as Wireshark, Aircrack-ng, and Kismet; inadequate staff training in wireless evidence handling; and the absence
of structured policies guiding forensic investigations. Furthermore, the University lacks a dedicated digital forensics
laboratory and a standardized incident response framework for wireless-related breaches. The study concludes that while
Busitema University has foundational ICT infrastructure, its forensic readiness remains low. Recommendations include
capacity building, acquisition of specialized wireless forensic tools, formulation of institutional policies, and establishment
of a centralized digital forensics laboratory to enhance security and investigative capabilities.
Keywords :
Wireless Network Forensics, Forensic Readiness, Cybersecurity, Digital Forensics Tools, Incident Response, ICT Infrastructure.