Authors : Arnel B. Belza; Vyrna R. Salcedo

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 10 - October

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2zdrw8yx

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/yck3vkw8

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25oct1364

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : This research aimed to investigate the preferred learning styles, the corresponding interest in mathematical problem- solving, and the current proficiency level of Grade 11 Accountancy, Business, and Management (ABM) students at Ninoy Aquino Senior High School, with the objective of formulating a necessary intervention plan. The study employed an explanatory mixed-methods design, initiating with a quantitative phase that gathered data from thirty purposively selected students. Data collection involved the use of the VARK learning style questionnaire (Visual, Auditory, Read/Write, Kinesthetic), problem-solving interest surveys, and a validated assessment of problem- solving skills. The subsequent qualitative phase involved interviews with three ABM teachers and three students to obtain deeper perspectives on instructional strategies and classroom experiences. Findings indicated that the majority of participants were categorized as Visual learners (42.86%), followed by Auditory learners (22.86%), Read/Write learners (20.00%), and Kinesthetic learners (14.29%). Overall, the problem- solving performance of the students Did Not Meet Expectations (63.43%). While the highest mean score was observed in Executing the Problem (72.38%), students displayed significant skill deficits in Understanding the Problem (47.62%) and in Developing and Verifying the Problem (both 68.57%). Furthermore, student feedback emphasized a desire for instructional activities that are more interactive, collaborative, and aligned with real-world applications. Based on these results, a comprehensive intervention plan (Project IBA) is proposed. This plan focuses on differentiating instructional strategies to align mathematics education with students’ identified learning preferences, thereby enhancing overall engagement and improving problem-solving proficiency, especially in the areas of comprehension and solution verification.

Keywords : Explanatory Mixed-Methods, Learning Styles, Problem-Solving, VARK Model, Mathematics Education, Instructional Strategies.

References :

1. Bakay, G. L., & Bacay, R. A. (2019). Learning preferences of students in the eleventh grade and how those choices impacted the students' ability to solve mathematical problems
2. Bernardo, A. B. I., Cordel, M. O., Lapinid, M. R. C., Tev, J. M. M., et al. (n.d.). [Publication title unknown].
3. Bosman, C., & Schulze, S. (2018). The connection that exists between the arithmetic abilities of secondary school students and the learning strategies that they favor the most.
4. Christner, R. W., & Mennuti, R. B. (n.d.). Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions in E… [Cited as Publication Source 43 in Turnitin report].
5. Delos Santos, M. C. (2019). ABM track students struggle with time management and problem-solving.
6. Department of Education. (2019). [Statistics on ABM enrollment and 2018 Programmed for International Student Assessment (PISA) results].
7. Fleming, N. D. (n.d.). VARK/VAK Model. [Cited as the basis for the study's theoretical framework].
8. Garcia. (2019). Problem-Based Learning (PBL) effectiveness in technical and scientific areas.
9. Hernandez. (2023). Effectiveness of Polya's system for solving problems on senior high school students.
10. Irvine. (2019). Kinesthetic learning style and movement/touch in learning mathematics.
11. Jamal Raiyn. (n.d.). Journal of Education and Practice. Computer Science Department, Al Qasemi Academic College for Education, Baqa El Gharbia, Israel.
12. Klang, N., Karlsson, N., Kilborn, W., Eriksson, P., & Karlberg, M. (2021). Mathematical problem-solving through cooperative learning—The importance of peer acceptance and friendships.
13. Lester, F. K., & Cai, J. (2016). [Research gaps in mathematical problem-solving and confidence as a predictor of ability].
14. Liljedahl, P., Santos-Trigo, M., Malaspina, U., & Bruder, R. (2016). Problem-solving in mathematics education.
15. Louange. (2007). Utilizing learning styles to help teachers employ a variety of teaching strategies and improve learning outcomes
16. López, N., & Salas, G. (2021). Multimodal learning strategies leading to successful learning outcomes
17. Machromah, I. U., Ishartono, N., Mirandhani, A., Muhroji, M., Samsudin, M., Basry, W., & Ernitasari, E. (2021). PISA problem-solving of students with a visual learning style.
18. Masinading, Z. M. B., & Gaylo, D. N. (n.d.). Differentiated Scaffolding Strategies i…
19. MindTools. (n.d.). VAK Learning Styles: Understanding how people learn best.
20. Nishiyama, E. E. (n.d.). Discharge Education in the Emergency Department: …
21. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). [PISA results on solving complex issues, influence of low confidence, and importance of problem-solving skills to companies].
22. Ozgan, H., & Alkan, E. (2012). Learning styles influencing how a person learns mathematics and the role of collaborative environments.
23. Peyman, H., Kiani, H., & Mahdavi, F. (2014). [VARK tool validity and Cronbach's alpha value coefficients.
24. Rahman, S. H. A., & Ahmar, A. S. (2017). [Teacher explanation for auditory learners, homework alignment, structured problem-solving, and sharing strategies to sharpen critical thinking].
25. Rodriguez. (2022). ABM students exhibit average thinking skills and struggle with complex issues.
26. Santrock, J. (2022). Intelligent Learning Styles, Module 5. [Details reconstructed from text].
27. Setiawan, A. (n.d.). MATHEMATICAL REASONING AND SELF REGULATED LEARNING T…
28. Şİrİn, E., & GÜzel, E. (2006). Individuals tend to choose distinct approaches to handling, interpreting, and engaging with information when they are learning.
29. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory
30. Wickremesinghe, V., & Hettiarachchi, M. (n.d.). VAK theory as the most successful at quickening the learning community.
31. Williams. (2009). Visual learning as a powerful technique based on cognitive science of human learning, and benefit from self-paced problem-solving
32. Williams, D., & Powell, S. (2020). A teaching approach that integrates all VARK modalities helps students develop their overall problem-solving abilities