Assessment of Real Estate Development Financing Models in Lagos State, Nigeria


Authors : Tosin Adebowale Kadiri; Igho Fayomi

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 9 - September


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/mrvb54xn

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4tfa5vcp

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25sep825

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : Background Financing remains a critical challenge in Nigeria’s real estate sector, where high capital intensity, macroeconomic instability, and weak institutional frameworks limit sustainable housing delivery. This study evaluates the financing models adopted by real estate developers in Lagos State and identifies the key factors influencing their adoption, contributing to the scarce empirical evidence on financing innovation in emerging markets.  Methods Using the 2025 REDAN Lagos State directory, the study targeted 391 registered development firms. A sample size of 194 was determined with Yamane’s (1967) formula, and 194 questionnaires were distributed. Of these, 146 valid responses were retrieved (75.26% response rate). Data analysis employed descriptive statistics and factor analysis to examine adoption patterns and underlying determinants.  Results The workforce was highly skilled, with 43.8% of respondents holding master’s degrees, while architects (37.7%) and engineers (32.2%) dominated professional profiles. At the firm level, 43.2% had delivered over 20 projects, demonstrating substantial project capacity. Among financing models, Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) were most adopted (mean = 4.2466), followed by joint ventures (mean = 4.1575) and public–private partnerships (mean = 4.0959). Conventional mechanisms such as equity financing and commercial bank loans (mean = 4.0548 each) remained central, while crowdfunding (mean = 4.0411) and tokenization (mean = 3.8014) showed gradual but constrained adoption. Factor analysis revealed six components explaining 70.21% of variance, with project scale and duration (mean = 4.1233), high cost of finance (mean = 3.8082), and inflation (mean = 3.7329) as the most critical determinants.  Conclusion The study provides novel insights into the hybrid financing landscape of Lagos State, highlighting the dominance of traditional models but also the emerging role of technology-driven alternatives. It argues that stronger institutional credibility, policy consistency, and regulatory support for innovative models are essential for deepening capital flows and ensuring sustainable real estate development in Nigeria.

Keywords : Real Estate Financing, REITs, Financing Models, Innovation, Lagos State, Emerging Markets.

References :

  1. Agbola, T., & Alabi, M. (2000). Sustainable housing delivery: Lessons from international experience. Journal of Environmental Studies, 2(1), 63–76.
  2. Akinmoladun, O. I., & Oluwoye, J. O. (2007). An assessment of why the problems of housing shortages persist in developing countries: A case of Lagos Metropolis, Nigeria. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 4(4), 589–598.
  3. Arku, G. (2006). The housing and economic development debate revisited: Economic significance of housing in developing countries. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 21(4), 377–395.
  4. Glaeser, E. L., & Gyourko, J. (2005). Urban decline and durable housing. Journal of Political Economy, 113(2), 345–375.
  5. Gyourko, J. (2009). Housing supply. Annual Review of Economics, 1(1), 295–318.
  6. Gyourko, J., & Rybczynski, W. (2000). Financing new urbanism projects: Obstacles and solutions. Housing Policy Debate, 11(3), 733–750.
  7. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
  8. Hargitay, S., & Yu, S. (2012). Property investment decisions: A quantitative approach. Routledge.
  9. Ling, D. C., & Archer, W. R. (2013). Real estate principles: A value approach. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  10. Mwangi, P. (2019). Financial innovations and challenges in real estate markets in Sub-Saharan Africa. African Review of Economics and Finance, 11(2), 141–163.
  11. Obeng-Odoom, F. (2011). The informal sector in Ghana under siege. Journal of Developing Societies, 27(3–4), 355–392.
  12. Oloke, O. C., Simon, R. F., & Adesulu, E. A. (2013). An examination of the factors affecting housing finance in Lagos State. International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sciences, 2(6), 342–348.
  13. Ogu, V. I., & Ogbuozobe, J. E. (2001). Housing policy in Nigeria: Towards enablement of private housing development. Habitat International, 25(4), 473–492.
  14. Quigley, J. M. (2007). Regulation and property values in the United States: The high cost of monopoly. Urban Studies, 44(3), 591–604.
  15. Risius, M., & Spohrer, K. (2017). A blockchain research framework. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59(6), 385–409.
  16. Tipple, G. (1994). The need for new urban housing in Sub-Saharan Africa: Problem or opportunity. African Affairs, 93(373), 587–608.
  17. UN-Habitat. (2011). Affordable land and housing in Africa. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
  18. CBN (Central Bank of Nigeria). (2025). Macro Economic Indicators; Inflation Rate Table; Economic Report (Jan 2025).
  19. CAHF (Centre for Affordable Housing Finance in Africa). (2024). Housing Finance in Africa Yearbook: Nigeria country profile.
  20. ICRC (Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commission). (n.d.). PPP framework in Nigeria (overview pages and guidelines).
  21. Knight Frank Nigeria. (2024). Lagos Market Update H1/H2 2024.
  22. Reuters. (2024–2025). Nigeria monetary policy and inflation coverage (various): policy rate at 27.5%; inflation easing to ~21.9–22.2% mid-2025.
  23. SEC Nigeria. (2021). Crowdfunding Rules; (2024). Accelerated Regulatory Incubation Programme (ARIP) for fintech capital-market innovations.
  24. SFS Capital. (2025). SFS REIT Fund Rating / Overview; manager of SFS REIT and UH REIT; first listed Nigerian REIT (2008).
  25. Stanbic IBTC Asset Management / UPDC REIT. (2022–2024). UPDC REIT Fact Sheets and Reports (distribution policy of ≥90% of net income; NGX listing).
  26. UPDC REIT / NGX filings. (2023–2024). Annual/quarterly reports and REIT profile.
  27. BusinessDay. (2025). Lagos short-let market turns gold on rising demand (market dynamics).
  28. Troloppe Property Services. (2024). Lagos City Report H2 2024 (pricing and rental trends).
  29. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics.
  30. Kraus, A., & Litzenberger, R. H. (1973). A state-preference model of optimal financial leverage. Journal of Finance.
  31. Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics.
  32. Chaman Law Firm. (2024, September 28). Affordable Housing Finance Models for Nigerian Real Estate Investors.
  33. Gbonegun, V. (2025, February 10). Developers explore alternative financing as bank rates deplete ROI. The Guardian Nigeria.
  34. Red Grapes Properties. (2025). Exploring Alternative Financing Options for Real Estate Projects in Nigeria.
  35. The Nation. (2025, February 10). FG launches N100bn real estate financing scheme to boost affordable housing.

Background Financing remains a critical challenge in Nigeria’s real estate sector, where high capital intensity, macroeconomic instability, and weak institutional frameworks limit sustainable housing delivery. This study evaluates the financing models adopted by real estate developers in Lagos State and identifies the key factors influencing their adoption, contributing to the scarce empirical evidence on financing innovation in emerging markets.  Methods Using the 2025 REDAN Lagos State directory, the study targeted 391 registered development firms. A sample size of 194 was determined with Yamane’s (1967) formula, and 194 questionnaires were distributed. Of these, 146 valid responses were retrieved (75.26% response rate). Data analysis employed descriptive statistics and factor analysis to examine adoption patterns and underlying determinants.  Results The workforce was highly skilled, with 43.8% of respondents holding master’s degrees, while architects (37.7%) and engineers (32.2%) dominated professional profiles. At the firm level, 43.2% had delivered over 20 projects, demonstrating substantial project capacity. Among financing models, Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) were most adopted (mean = 4.2466), followed by joint ventures (mean = 4.1575) and public–private partnerships (mean = 4.0959). Conventional mechanisms such as equity financing and commercial bank loans (mean = 4.0548 each) remained central, while crowdfunding (mean = 4.0411) and tokenization (mean = 3.8014) showed gradual but constrained adoption. Factor analysis revealed six components explaining 70.21% of variance, with project scale and duration (mean = 4.1233), high cost of finance (mean = 3.8082), and inflation (mean = 3.7329) as the most critical determinants.  Conclusion The study provides novel insights into the hybrid financing landscape of Lagos State, highlighting the dominance of traditional models but also the emerging role of technology-driven alternatives. It argues that stronger institutional credibility, policy consistency, and regulatory support for innovative models are essential for deepening capital flows and ensuring sustainable real estate development in Nigeria.

Keywords : Real Estate Financing, REITs, Financing Models, Innovation, Lagos State, Emerging Markets.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
31 - December - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe