⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Augment or Replace? Uneven Labour Market Consequences of AI Expansion Across Asia-Pacific Economies


Authors : Seyram Amedede; Nguyen Thuy Ha; YAO Tang; Xiaofen Tan

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 9 - September


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2paj7ufu

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26sep271

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : The rapid diffusion of artificial intelligence (AI) has intensified debates regarding its implications for employment and the future of work. While some scholars argue that AI complements human labour by enhancing productivity and creating new employment opportunities, others contend that it displaces workers through automation and task substitution. This study examines the labour-market consequences of AI across selected Asia-Pacific economies, focusing on whether AI primarily augments or replaces labour. Drawing on the theoretical foundations of skill-biased technological change, routinebiased technological change, and task-based approaches to technological transformation, the study investigates the relationship between AI intensity and occupational employment structures using panel data from China, Japan, South Korea, Hong Kong, and Taiwan over the period 2010-2025. A composite AI Intensity Index is constructed using principal component analysis, while fixed-effects panel regression models are employed to assess the effects of AI development on high-skill, middle-skill, and low-skill employment shares. The findings indicate that AI development is positively associated with high-skill employment but negatively associated with middle-skill employment, suggesting that AI simultaneously generates labour augmentation and labour displacement effects. These relationships remain robust across alternative specifications, including lagged AI measures and leave-one-country-out estimations. The results further reveal significant cross-country heterogeneity, indicating that the labour-market consequences of AI are shaped by differences in institutional arrangements, innovation capacity, and economic structures, while robustness analyses confirm that the findings are not driven by any single economy. The study contributes to the emerging literature on AI and employment by demonstrating that the effects of AI are neither uniformly beneficial nor uniformly disruptive but are instead context-dependent and manifested through processes of occupational restructuring. The findings underline the importance of adopting nuanced and comparative perspectives when evaluating the implications of AI for labour markets and workforce transformation.

Keywords : Artificial Intelligence; Labour-Market Restructuring; Employment; Skill-Biased Technological Change; Routine-Biased Technological Change; Occupational Change; Asia-Pacific.

References :

  1. Abdellah, O. (2025). Modeling non-stationary processes in panel data econometrics: cointegration tests and error correction mechanisms applied to macroeconomic time series across multiple countries. Journal of Experimental and Computational Methods in Applied Sciences10(5), 1-13.
  2. Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011). Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. In Handbook of labor economics (pp. 1043-1171). Elsevier.
  3. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019). Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives33(2), 3-30.
  4. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020). Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets. Journal of Political Economy128(6), 2188-2244.
  5. Acemoglu, D., Autor, D., Hazell, J., & Restrepo, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence and jobs: Evidence from online vacancies. Journal of Labor Economics40(S1), S293-S340.
  6. Alin, A. (2010). Multicollinearity. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics2(3), 370-374.
  7. Autor, D. (2022). The labor market impacts of technological change: From unbridled enthusiasm to qualified optimism to vast uncertainty (NBER Working Paper No. w30074). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  8. Autor, D. H., Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (1998). Computing inequality: have computers changed the labor market?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics113(4), 1169-1213.
  9. Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics118(4), 1279-1333.
  10. Bassanini, A., & Ernst, E. (2002). Labour market institutions, product market regulation, and innovation: cross-country evidence (OECD Working Paper No. ECO/WKP(2002)2). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
  11. Bessen, J. (2019). Automation and jobs: When technology boosts employment. Economic Policy34(100), 589-626.
  12. Born, B., & Breitung, J. (2016). Testing for serial correlation in fixed-effects panel data models. Econometric Reviews35(7), 1290-1316.
  13. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work progress and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. WW Norton & Company.
  14. Brynjolfsson, E., Chandar, B., & Chen, R. (2025). Canaries in the coal mine?: Six facts about the recent employment effects of artificial intelligence. Standford Publications
  15. Chan, J. Y. L., Leow, S. M. H., Bea, K. T., Cheng, W. K., Phoong, S. W., Hong, Z. W., & Chen, Y. L. (2022). Mitigating the multicollinearity problem and its machine learning approach: a review. Mathematics10(8), Article 1283.
  16. Cheng, Y., Cross, A., Hemmert, M., Kapturkiewicz, A., Kotosaka, M., & Waldenberger, F. (2026). Internationalisation and the development of East Asian startup ecosystems. In Unleashing innovation the East Asian way: Startup ecosystems in Japan, South Korea and China (pp. 171-195). Springer Nature Singapore.
  17. Consoli, D., Marin, G., Rentocchini, F., & Vona, F. (2023). Routinization, within-occupation task changes and long-run employment dynamics. Research Policy52(1), 104658.
  18. Damioli, G., Van Roy, V., & Vertesy, D. (2021). The impact of artificial intelligence on labor productivity. Eurasian Business Review11(1), 1-25.
  19. Fan, D., & Liu, K. (2021). The relationship between artificial intelligence and China’s sustainable economic growth: focused on the mediating effects of industrial structural change. Sustainability13(20), Article 11542.
  20. Felten, E., Raj, M., & Seamans, R. (2021). Occupational, industry, and geographic exposure to artificial intelligence: A novel dataset and its potential uses. Strategic Management Journal42(12), 2195-2217.
  21. Ferdousi, J., Shokran, M., & Islam, M. S. (2026). Designing Human–AI collaborative decision analytics frameworks to enhance managerial judgment and organizational performance. Journal of Business and Management Studies8(1), 01-19.
  22. Fernández-Macías, E., & Bisello, M. (2022). A comprehensive taxonomy of tasks for assessing the impact of new technologies on work. Social Indicators Research159(2), 821-841.
  23. Frank, M. R., Ahn, Y. Y., & Moro, E. (2025). AI exposure predicts unemployment risk: A new approach to technology-driven job loss. PNAS Nexus4(4), pgaf107.
  24. Frees, E. W. (2001). Omitted variables in longitudinal data models. Canadian Journal of Statistics29(4), 573-595.
  25. Freund, L., & Mann, L. (2026). Job transformation, specialization, and the labor market effects of AI (CESifo Working Paper No. 12072). CESifo.
  26. George, A. S. (2023). Future economic implications of artificial intelligence. Partners Universal International Research Journal2(3), 20-39.
  27. Georgieff, A., & Hyee, R. (2021). Artificial intelligence and employment: New cross-country evidence. OECD Social, Employment, and Migration Working Papers, (265), 0_1-60.
  28. Ghosh, D., Ghosh, R., Roy Chowdhury, S., & Ganguly, B. (2025). AI-exposure and labour market: a systematic literature review on estimations, validations, and perceptions: D. Ghosh et al. Management Review Quarterly75(1), 677-704.
  29. GPAI. (2025). Generative AI and the future of work global dialogue: Perceptions and prospects. Global Partnership on AI.
  30. Green, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence and jobs: No signs of slowing labour demand (yet). OECD Employment Outlook
  31. Greenacre, M., Groenen, P. J., Hastie, T., d’Enza, A. I., Markos, A., & Tuzhilina, E. (2022). Principal component analysis. Nature Reviews Methods Primers2(1), Article 100.
  32. Hassani, H., Silva, E. S., Unger, S., TajMazinani, M., & Mac Feely, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence (AI) or intelligence augmentation (IA): What is the future?. Ai1(2), Article 8.
  33. ILO. (2025). Generative AI and jobs: A 2025 update. International Labour Organization
  34. IMF. (2024). Gen-AI: Artificial intelligence and the future of work. International Monetary Fund
  35. Jolliffe, I. T. (1990). Principal component analysis: A beginner's guide—I. Introduction and application. Weather45(10), 375-382.
  36. Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Choosing a subset of principal components or variables. In Principal component analysis (pp. 92-114). Springer New York.
  37. Kyriazos, T., & Poga, M. (2023). Dealing with multicollinearity in factor analysis: the problem, detections, and solutions. Open Journal of Statistics13(3), 404-424.
  38. Li, Z., & Fotheringham, A. S. (2026). Spatial context as a time-invariant confounder: A Fixed-Effects extension of MGWR. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 1-25.
  39. Liu, J., Jiang, X., Shi, M., & Yang, Y. (2024). Impact of artificial intelligence on manufacturing industry global value chain position. Sustainability16(3), Article 1341.
  40. Morandini, S., Fraboni, F., De Angelis, M., Puzzo, G., Giusino, D., & Pietrantoni, L. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence on workers’ skills: Upskilling and reskilling in organisations. Informing Science26, 39-68.
  41. Nankervis, A. R., Burgess, J., & Nankervis, A. R. C. (2020). The future of work in Asia and beyond. Routledge.
  42. Noy, S., & Zhang, W. (2023). Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science381(6654), 187-192.
  43. OECD. (2026). AI and skills: What we know so far. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f843b352-en.
  44. Paul, S., Yuan, L., Jain, H. K., Robert Jr, L. P., Spohrer, J., & Lifshitz-Assaf, H. (2022). Intelligence augmentation: Human factors in ai and future of work. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction14(3), 426-445.
  45. Petroulakis, F. (2023). Task content and job losses in the Great Lockdown. ILR Review76(3), 586-613.
  46. Pitukhina, M. A., Gurtov, V. A., & Belykh, A. D. (2024). The review of Chinese artificial intelligence labor market: Both in figures and skills.  Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities and Social Sciences, 17(3), 580-591
  47. Pizzinelli, C., Panton, A. J., Tavares, M. M. M., Cazzaniga, M., & Li, L. (2023). Labor market exposure to AI: Cross-country differences and distributional implications. International Monetary Fund.
  48. Rato, T., Reis, M., Schmitt, E., Hubert, M., & De Ketelaere, B. (2016). A systematic comparison of PCA‐based statistical process monitoring methods for high‐dimensional, time‐dependent processes. AIChE Journal62(5), 1478-1493.
  49. Rustamova, M., Yormatov, I., Uktamjonova, Z., & Muydinova, G. (2024, April). The AI revolution: Implications for business models, economic growth, and labor markets. In 2024 International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Communication Systems (ICKECS) (Vol. 1, pp. 1–6). IEEE.
  50. Sathyanarayana, S., & Mohanasundaram, T. (2025). Stationarity and unit roots in time series: Theoretical insights and practical considerations. IRA-International Journal of Management and Social Sciences (ISSN 2455-2267)21(2), 46-46.
  51. Tschang, F. T., & Almirall, E. (2021). Artificial intelligence as augmenting automation: Implications for employment. Academy of Management Perspectives35(4), 642-659.
  52. Wang, Y., Zhong, M., Sharma, P., & Niu, D. F. (2026). The impact of human-centred artificial intelligence on firms’ workforce demand in Industry 5.0 transition. Enterprise Information Systems20(2), Article 2595706.
  53. WEF. (2026). How Asia-Pacific can turn AI innovation into sustainable economic impact. World Economic Forum
  54. Wiese, R., Jalles, J. T., & de Haan, J. (2025). The impact of increasing labour market rigidity on employment growth in OECD countries. Economic Analysis and Policy85, 2265-2275.
  55. Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Econometrics: Panel data methods. Michigan State University
  56. Xu, G., Murthy, S. V., & Jia, B. (2025). Enhancing intuitive decision-making and reliance through Human–Ai collaboration: A review. In Informatics (p. 135). MDPI.
  57. Yin, K., Cai, F., & Huang, C. (2023). How does artificial intelligence development affect green technology innovation in China? Evidence from dynamic panel data analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research30(10), 28066-28090.

The rapid diffusion of artificial intelligence (AI) has intensified debates regarding its implications for employment and the future of work. While some scholars argue that AI complements human labour by enhancing productivity and creating new employment opportunities, others contend that it displaces workers through automation and task substitution. This study examines the labour-market consequences of AI across selected Asia-Pacific economies, focusing on whether AI primarily augments or replaces labour. Drawing on the theoretical foundations of skill-biased technological change, routinebiased technological change, and task-based approaches to technological transformation, the study investigates the relationship between AI intensity and occupational employment structures using panel data from China, Japan, South Korea, Hong Kong, and Taiwan over the period 2010-2025. A composite AI Intensity Index is constructed using principal component analysis, while fixed-effects panel regression models are employed to assess the effects of AI development on high-skill, middle-skill, and low-skill employment shares. The findings indicate that AI development is positively associated with high-skill employment but negatively associated with middle-skill employment, suggesting that AI simultaneously generates labour augmentation and labour displacement effects. These relationships remain robust across alternative specifications, including lagged AI measures and leave-one-country-out estimations. The results further reveal significant cross-country heterogeneity, indicating that the labour-market consequences of AI are shaped by differences in institutional arrangements, innovation capacity, and economic structures, while robustness analyses confirm that the findings are not driven by any single economy. The study contributes to the emerging literature on AI and employment by demonstrating that the effects of AI are neither uniformly beneficial nor uniformly disruptive but are instead context-dependent and manifested through processes of occupational restructuring. The findings underline the importance of adopting nuanced and comparative perspectives when evaluating the implications of AI for labour markets and workforce transformation.

Keywords : Artificial Intelligence; Labour-Market Restructuring; Employment; Skill-Biased Technological Change; Routine-Biased Technological Change; Occupational Change; Asia-Pacific.

Paper Submission Last Date
30 - September - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe