Authors : Maximo G. Asumbrado; Remigilda Gallardo

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 6 - June

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3tkfzhcd

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3dc88za7

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN526

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This study explores the relationship between autonomy support and intrinsic motivation among Grade 4 learners. Utilizing a descriptive correlation research design, data was collected from 100 Grade 4 students in Davao City using an adapted survey instrument. The study evaluates three autonomy support indicators: providing meaningful choices, encouraging input and feedback, and offering rationale for tasks and activities. Results demonstrate a remarkably high level of intrinsic motivation among Grade 4 learners, with very extensive mean scores for enjoyment, interest, and perceived competence. The overall mean of suggests a widespread manifestation of intrinsic motivation within the sampled population. The subsequent analysis confirms a significant positive correlation between autonomy support and intrinsic motivation, rejecting the null hypothesis. The study further identifies that providing meaningful choices, encouraging input and feedback, and offering rationale for tasks and activities significantly influence intrinsic motivation. These findings hold implications for educational policymakers, school leaders, teachers, and learners, emphasizing the importance of integrating autonomy-supportive practices to enhance intrinsic motivation in Grade 4 classrooms. Future researchers are encouraged to explore the specific factors contributing to high levels of intrinsic motivation and its long-term impact on diverse student populations.

Keywords : Autonomy Support, Intrinsic Motivation, Grade 4 Learners, Meaningful Choices, Input and Feedback, Rationale for Tasks and Activities.

References :

1. Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contribution of enjoyment to students' continuing interest in learning about science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 4-12.
2. Anderson, D. L., & Reidy, J. R. (2018). The effect of course goal clarification on self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(6), 838-850.
3. Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students' engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 261-278.
4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
5. Bannert, M., & Mengelkamp, C. (2018). Task rationale and students' cognitive strategies during independent learning. Learning and Instruction, 56, 81-92.
6. Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740-756.
7. Carless, D., & Lam, J. (2017). Developing self-regulated learning through formative assessment and feedback. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
8. Chen, C.-M., Wang, C.-Y., & Liang, J.-C. (2021). Investigating the relationship among college students' intrinsic motivation, learning engagement, and academic performance in online learning environments. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 24(2), 291-304.
9. Cheon, S. H., & Reeve, J. (2015). Do culturally responsive autonomy-supportive teaching enhance intrinsic motivation and academic achievement? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 1-21.
10. Cho, K. L., & Schunn, C. D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education, 48(3), 409-426.
11. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
12. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
13. Dhir, A., Pallesen, S., & San Pedro, J. (2019). Mobile learning and student enjoyment: A secondary school student perspective. Computers & Education, 133, 98-110.
14. Durik, A. M., Vida, M., & Eccles, J. S. (2018). Task values and ability beliefs as predictors of high school literacy choices: A developmental analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(5), 685-699.
15. Durksen, T. L., Klassen, R. M., & Daniels, L. M. (2016). Motivation and collaboration: The keys to a developmental framework for teachers' professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 401-413.
16. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2015). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
17. Ghanizadeh, A., Esfandiar, H., & Rasekh, A. E. (2021). The effects of task rationale on EFL learners' motivation and speaking ability. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1916046.
18. Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., & Chanal, J. (2010). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education. Canadian Psychology/ Psychologie Canadienne, 51(3), 207-215.
19. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
20. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.
21. Huxham, M., & Laybourn, A. (2014). Encouraging student dialogue and reflection in feedback: A qualitative exploration of staff and students' perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(3), 347-362.
22. Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588-600.
23. Jansen, A., Murdock, J., & Tocci, C. (2019). Teacher autonomy support and student perceived competence: Unique predictors of student engagement in mathematics. School Psychology Quarterly, 34(2), 238-249.
24. Kim, H. J., & Kim, H.-S. (2019). Motivational interventions for college English language learners' academic achievement and motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(1), 130-147.
25. Kusurkar, R. A., Croiset, G., Galindo-Garré, F., & Ten Cate, O. T. J. (2013). Motivational profiles of medical students: Association with study effort, academic performance and exhaustion. BMC Medical Education, 13(1), 87.
26. Legaspi, J. A., & Tancinco, J. J. (2015). Autonomy and motivation in Philippine basic education: A review of research. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 48(2), 105-132.
27. Li, C., Liang, J.-C., & Li, R. (2020). A study on the effects of blended learning on student engagement, learning motivation and academic achievement in a course of Chinese as a foreign language. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1489-1507.
28. Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Patall, E. A., & Pekrun, R. (2016). Adaptive motivation and emotion in education: Research and principles for instructional design. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2), 228-236.
29. Liu, N. F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279-290.
30. Mokhtari, K., Reichard, C. A., & Gardner, A. (2012). The impact of Internet and television use on the reading habits and practices of college students. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(8), 735-745.
31. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.
32. Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133-144.
33. Ommundsen, Y., Haug, E., & Lund, S. (2018). Teacher and peer support for young adolescents' motivation, engagement, and well-being in physical education. Journal of Educational Research, 111(2), 172-184.
34. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578.
35. Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 270-300.
36. Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Wynn, S. R. (2010). The effectiveness and relative importance of choice in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 896-915.
37. Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students' engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257-267.
38. Reeve, J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Self-determination theory: A dialectical framework for understanding socio-cultural influences on student motivation. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (Vol. 4, pp. 31-60). Information Age Publishing.
39. Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students' engagement by increasing teachers' autonomy support. Motivation and
40. Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. New York: Routledge.
41. Rintala, P., & Kinnunen, J. (2019). Physical education as a meaningful choice: Exploring students' enjoyment and perceived autonomy support. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 38(4), 397-406.
42. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860.
43. Schraw, G., Flowerday, T., & Lehman, S. (2001). Increasing situational interest in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 211-224.
44. Sun, L., & Chen, S. (2020). The effect of teacher credibility on task explanation and students' motivation: A study based on self-determination theory. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(2), 221-230.
45. Sung, Y.-T., Yeh, C.-C., & Chang, K.-E. (2021). Learner characteristics, intrinsic motivation, and perceived learning outcomes in an online course. Computers & Education, 161, 104031.
46. Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2019). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(4), 661-687.
47. Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(4), 661-687.
48. Vansteenkiste, M., Zhou, M., Lens, W., & Soenens, B. (2018). Experiences of autonomy and control among Chinese learners: Vitalizing or immobilizing? Motivation Science, 4(2), 132-149.
49. Wang, C.-Y., & Hsu, W.-H. (2017). The effects of flipped classrooms on learning engagement and achievement in a fully online course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 237-247.
50. Wang, C.-Y., Chen, N.-S., & Liang, J.-C. (2020). The relationships between self-regulated learning, intrinsic motivation, and academic performance in a blended learning environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 44, 100706.
51. Wang, C.-Y., Chen, N.-S., & Liang, J.-C. (2021). Investigating the relationship among college students' intrinsic motivation, learning engagement, and academic performance in online learning environments. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 24(2), 291-304.
52. Xu, J., & Yang, L. (2019). The effect of personal interest-related task explanation on students' intrinsic motivation in mathematics. International Journal of Instruction, 12