Autonomy Support, Intrinsic Motivation, and Self- Regulation Among Laguna State Polytechnic University Santa Cruz Campus College Students


Authors : Jam Louise F. Jolo

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 8 - August


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/58ah84a3

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/y6t52s8w

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25aug921

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : This study examined the relationships among autonomy support, intrinsic motivation, and self-regulation among first-year college students at Laguna State Polytechnic University–Santa Cruz Campus. Grounded in Self-Determination Theory, the Self-Regulated Learning Framework, and Culturally Responsive Teaching Models, the research employed a quantitative, descriptive-correlational design to explore how autonomy-supportive practices influenced students' motivation and self-management strategies. Data were gathered from 305 students across 27 academic programs using a validated survey instrument and were analyzed through descriptive and inferential statistics. Findings revealed that autonomy support and intrinsic motivation were rated as very high, while self-regulation was assessed as high. Teacher feedback (M=3.45, SD=0.55), opportunities for choice in assignments (M=3.19, SD=.62) and encouragement for self-directed learning (M=3.37, SD=0.60) demonstrated strong autonomy support. Students exhibited very high intrinsic motivation in interest in subject matter (M=3.47, SD=0.50), enjoyment of learning activities (M=3.48, SD=0.50), and desire for mastery and competence (M=3.56, SD=0.46). Self-regulation was reflected in high time management skills (M=3.09, SD=0.64) and goal setting (M=3.29, SD=0.59), alongside very high self-monitoring and evaluation (M=3.29, SD=0.59). Statistical analysis confirmed significant positive correlations between autonomy support and self-regulation, as well as between intrinsic motivation and self-regulation, indicating moderate to high positive relationships. These findings highlighted the crucial role of autonomy-supportive strategies—such as constructive feedback, meaningful choice, and support for self-directed learning—in fostering student motivation and self-regulation. To further enhance academic success and holistic development, the Enhance Autonomy Support, Intrinsic Motivation, and Self- Regulation Program was proposed as a structured intervention.

Keywords : Autonomy Support, Intrinsic Motivation, Self-Regulation, and College Students.

References :

  1. Admiraal, W., et al. (2024). Student control and its impact on self-regulated learning in higher education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(2), 245–260.
  2. Alamri, A., Bureau, J., & colleagues. (2020). Promoting learner autonomy: A meta-analysis of autonomy-supportive practices in education. Educational Review, 72(5), 605–629.
  3. Cahyani, A., & Setiyani, R. (2024). Intrinsic motivation and academic resilience among Indonesian university students. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(1), 45–58.
  4. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  5. Davidovitch, N., & Dorot, R. (2023). Intrinsic motivation and academic performance: A comparative study of high school and college students. International Journal of Educational Research, 120, 102154.
  6. Flunger, B., et al. (2024). Contextualizing autonomy support in culturally diverse classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 87, 101637.
  7. Gay, G. (2021). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
  8. Grassinger, R., et al. (2024). Intrinsic motivation and school well-being among German secondary students. Journal of School Psychology, 95, 34–48.
  9. Junaštíková, A. (2024). Reflective practices and self-regulated learning among Slovak university students. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(2), 189–205.
  10. Kahu, E. (2023). Engagement theory and student autonomy in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(7), 967–981.
  11. Khan, A., & Younas, F. (2021). The role of intrinsic motivation in Pakistani undergraduate learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 215–230.
  12. Khan, A., et al. (2020). Self-regulated learning strategies and academic success among university students. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(4), 795–809.
  13. Kristensen, T., & Jeno, L. M. (2024). Teacher autonomy support and mental health in Norwegian students: A longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 98, 102102.
  14. Miao, Y., & Ma, Q. (2023). Autonomy support and online engagement during COVID-19. Computers & Education, 195, 104679.
  15. Mouratidis, A., et al. (2024). Structured guidance and autonomy support in learning outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 68, 102067.
  16. Patall, E. A. (2020). The role of choice in motivation and learning. Educational Psychologist, 55(4), 208–230.
  17. Pineda, D., et al. (2024). Autonomy-supportive practices and student engagement in Spanish universities. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 21(3), 34–52.
  18. Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2020). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. Routledge.
  19. Reeve, J., & Cheon, S. H. (2021). Autonomy-supportive teaching: Its malleability, benefits, and potential for professional development. Educational Psychologist, 56(1), 54–77.
  20. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
  21. Schladitz, S., et al. (2024). Intrinsic motivation, mental health, and well-being among German and Austrian university students. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1132456.
  22. Šimić Šašić, S., & Atlaga, S. (2024). Encouraging self-directed learning in higher education. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 30(2), 55–68.
  23. Sinkkonen, H., & Tapani, A. (2024). Self-regulation and academic goal attainment in Finnish students. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 68(1), 77–92.
  24. Wu, J., & Dong, X. (2024). Autonomy support, peer relationships, and teacher-student interactions in predicting student well-being. Educational Studies, 50(1), 92–109.
  25. Zhang, Y., & Gao, L. (2021). Autonomy support and self-regulation among Chinese students. Learning and Motivation, 73, 101689.
  26. Zhou, M., & Lee, J. (2021). Intrinsic motivation and self-regulated learning among Chinese university students. Journal of Educational Research, 114(2), 112–126.
  27. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2022). Self-regulated learning: Theories, measures, and outcomes (3rd ed.). Routledge.

This study examined the relationships among autonomy support, intrinsic motivation, and self-regulation among first-year college students at Laguna State Polytechnic University–Santa Cruz Campus. Grounded in Self-Determination Theory, the Self-Regulated Learning Framework, and Culturally Responsive Teaching Models, the research employed a quantitative, descriptive-correlational design to explore how autonomy-supportive practices influenced students' motivation and self-management strategies. Data were gathered from 305 students across 27 academic programs using a validated survey instrument and were analyzed through descriptive and inferential statistics. Findings revealed that autonomy support and intrinsic motivation were rated as very high, while self-regulation was assessed as high. Teacher feedback (M=3.45, SD=0.55), opportunities for choice in assignments (M=3.19, SD=.62) and encouragement for self-directed learning (M=3.37, SD=0.60) demonstrated strong autonomy support. Students exhibited very high intrinsic motivation in interest in subject matter (M=3.47, SD=0.50), enjoyment of learning activities (M=3.48, SD=0.50), and desire for mastery and competence (M=3.56, SD=0.46). Self-regulation was reflected in high time management skills (M=3.09, SD=0.64) and goal setting (M=3.29, SD=0.59), alongside very high self-monitoring and evaluation (M=3.29, SD=0.59). Statistical analysis confirmed significant positive correlations between autonomy support and self-regulation, as well as between intrinsic motivation and self-regulation, indicating moderate to high positive relationships. These findings highlighted the crucial role of autonomy-supportive strategies—such as constructive feedback, meaningful choice, and support for self-directed learning—in fostering student motivation and self-regulation. To further enhance academic success and holistic development, the Enhance Autonomy Support, Intrinsic Motivation, and Self- Regulation Program was proposed as a structured intervention.

Keywords : Autonomy Support, Intrinsic Motivation, Self-Regulation, and College Students.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
30 - November - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe