Authors : Humphrey Lephethe Motsepe

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 7 - July

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/y2bwepmx

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/48svuxcu

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jul1135

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : In industries that need to operate around the clock, shift systems are essential for guaranteeing uninterrupted service delivery. The shift scheduling strategies employed by private sector companies and the public agricultural services, more especially, field rangers and redline gate guards, are contrasted in this study. Flexibility in shift implementation is often limited by the public sector's strict employment regulations and limited budgets. Private sector organizations, on the other hand, frequently use more adaptable and dynamic shift systems that are intended to maximize operational effectiveness and profitability. This study identifies significant variations in staffing models, budget allocations, and operational challenges through a qualitative comparative analysis of policy documents, budget reports, and pertinent literature. The results show that limited overtime budgets and fixed staffing patterns pose serious challenges to public agricultural services, potentially jeopardizing worker well-being and continuous coverage. Private sector shift systems, on the other hand, have the advantage of flexible workforce scheduling and financial incentives; however, they must strike a balance between cost effectiveness and employee satisfaction. The study emphasizes the necessity of reforming the public sector to implement more adaptable shift scheduling systems that take financial constraints into account without sacrificing service continuity. Particularly in industries where continuous service is a must, the ramifications for public sector human resource management and policy formation are substantial. This research contributes to the limited comparative literature on shift systems in public versus private sector contexts and suggests areas for further inquiry, including the potential adaptation of private sector practices to public sector constraints.

Keywords : Shift Systems, Public Sector, Private Sector, Staffing Models, Budget Constraints.

References :

1. Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2016). Strategy and human resource management (4th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
2. Brown, A., & Clarke, S. (2021). Public sector workforce scheduling: Challenges and opportunities. Public Administration Review, 81(4), 615–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13325
3. Caruso, C. C. (2021). Negative impacts of shift work and long work hours. Rehabilitation Nursing, 46(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnj.42
4. Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019
5. Donaldson, L. (2019). The contingency theory of organizations. SAGE Publications.
6. Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Hu, J., & Baer, J. C. (2022). How flexible workforce scheduling supports organizational agility: A strategic HRM perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 32(4), 100864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100864
7. Johnson, L., Patel, R., & Singh, M. (2024). Comparative analysis of shift work in public and private sectors. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 35(2), 310–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2023.2178893
8. Lee, H., & Park, J. (2020). Flexible shift scheduling in manufacturing firms: Effects on productivity and employee satisfaction. Journal of Operations Management, 66(5), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2020.01.003
9. Moyo, T., Dlamini, N., & Khumalo, P. (2022). Workforce challenges in public agricultural services: A case study of South African field rangers. South African Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v20i0.1534
10. Nguyen, T., & Tran, Q. (2023). Managing shift work: Strategies for workforce flexibility. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 100824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100824
11. Scott, J. (2021). Documents and methods in social research. SAGE Publications.
12. Smith, J., & Johnson, K. (2022). The complexities of public sector shift systems in agricultural services. Journal of Public Administration, 58(3), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2022.2070012
13. Wilson, G., & Adams, R. (2023). Budgetary constraints and overtime policy in public service organizations. Public Budgeting & Finance, 43(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12245
14. Wiles, R., Prosser, J., Bagnoli, A., Clark, A., Davies, K., & Holland, S. (2012). Ethical regulation and qualitative research. Ethics and Social Welfare, 6(2), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2012.671085