Authors : Thomas Nipielim Tindan; Harun Abdul Rahaman

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 1 - January

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3pnk95dh

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/73sb9w7x

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14792191

Abstract : Promoting scientific literacy and critical thinking among students through effective science education is essential. However, various barriers, including systemic issues in educational policies, inadequate educational resources, insufficient teacher professional training and lack of student-centred engagement in class activities, impede the effectiveness of science teaching and learning. This paper explores various approaches to address these challenges, emphasizing on addressing the systemic issues in educational policies, enhancing availability of educational resources, improving teacher professional development and increasing student-centred engagement in classroom activities. By adopting these strategies, educators can enhance the standards of science education by equipping students to tackle the demands of the 21st century.

Keywords : Barriers; Classroom; Inclusive Education; Professional Development; Prospective Science Teachers; Science Education; Special Education; Student-Centred.

References :

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
2. Buxton, C., Harman, R., Cardozo-Gaibisso, L., Jiang, L., Bui, K., & Allexsaht-Snider, M. (2019). Understanding
3. Science and Language Connections: New Approaches to Assessment with Bilingual Learners. Research in Science Education, 49(4), 977–988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9846-8
4. Cretu, D. M., & Morandau, F. (2020). Initial Teacher Education for Inclusive Education: A Bibliometric Analysis of
5. Educational Research. Sustainability, 12(12), 4923. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124923
6. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
7. Egger, D., & Abels, S. (2022). The analytical competency model to investigate the video-stimulated analysis of inclusive sciene education. Progress in Science Education (PriSE), 48-63. https://doi.org/10.25321/PRISE.2022.1319
8. Fitzgerald, M., Danaia, L., & McKinnon, D. H. (2019). Barriers Inhibiting Inquiry-Based Science Teaching and
9. Potential Solutions: Perceptions of Positively Inclined Early Adopters. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 543–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9623-5
10. Florian, L., & Rouse, M. (2009). The inclusive practice project in Scotland: Teacher education for inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(4), 594–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.003
11. Forlin, C., Loreman, T., Sharma, U., & Earle, C. (2009). Demographic differences in changing pre‐service teachers’ attitudes, sentiments and concerns about inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110701365356
12. Fränkel, S., Sterken, M., & Stinken-Rösner, L. (2023). From barriers to boosters: Initial teacher education for inclusive science education. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1191619. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1191619
13. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
14. Hayes, E. (2017). The challenges of science teaching. Science in School.
15. https://www.scienceinschool.org/article/2017/challenges-science-teaching/
16. Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching:
17. Commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 155-192.
18. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107. Hurd, P. D. (2000). Science education for the 21st century. School Science and Mathematics, 100(6), 282-288.
19. Jordan, A., Glenn, C., & McGhie-Richmond, D. (2010). The Supporting Effective Teaching (SET) project: The relationship of inclusive teaching practices to teachers’ beliefs about disability and ability, and about their roles as teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.005
20. Jordan, A., & Stanovich, P. (2003). Teachers’ personal epistemological beliefs about students with disabilities as indicators of effective teaching practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 3(1), j.1471-
21. 3802.2003.00184.x. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2003.00184.x
22. Mutch‐Jones, K., Puttick, G., & Minner, D. (2012). Lesson study for accessible science: Building expertise to improve practice in inclusive science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(8), 1012–1034. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21034
23. National Research Council. (2006). America's Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science. The National Academies Press.
24. Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079.
25. Pancsofar, N., & Petroff, J. G. (2016). Teachers’ experiences with co-teaching as a model for inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(10), 1043–1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2016.1145264
26. Pugach, M. C., Blanton, L. P., Mickelson, A. M., & Boveda, M. (2020). Curriculum Theory: The Missing Perspective in Teacher Education for Inclusion. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 43(1), 85–103.
27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419883665
28. Sosu, E. M., Mtika, P., & Colucci‐Gray, L. (2010). Does initial teacher education make a difference? The impact of teacher preparation on student teachers’ attitudes towards educational inclusion. Journal of Education for Teaching, 36(4), 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2010.513847
29. Soysal, Y., & Radmard, S. (2022). Barriers Faced by Teachers as an Estimator of the Effectiveness of Reform-Based
30. Initiatives. Journal of Education, 202(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057420943189
31. Spektor-Levy, O., & Yifrach, M. (2019). If Science Teachers Are Positively Inclined Toward Inclusive Education,
32. Why Is It So Difficult? Research in Science Education, 49(3), 737–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-0179636-0
33. Stayton, V. D., & McCollum, J. (2002). Unifying General and Special Education: What Does the Research Tell Us?
34. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 25(3), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840640202500302
35. Stinken-Rösner, L., Rott, L., Hundertmark, S., Baumann, T., Menthe, J., Hoffmann, T., Nehring, A., & Abels, S. (2020). Thinking Inclusive Science Education from two Perspectives: Inclusive Pedagogy and Science Education. RISTAL, 3, 30. https://doi.org/10.23770/rt1831
36. Symeonidou, S. (2017). Initial teacher education for inclusion: A review of the literature. Disability & Society, 32(3), 401–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1298992
37. UNESCO. (2005). Guidelines for inclusion: Ensuring access to education for all. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001402/140224e.pdf
38. Villanueva, M. G., & Hand, B. (2011). Science for All: Engaging Students with Special Needs in and About Science.
39. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(4), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00344.x Winn, J., & Blanton, L. (2017). The Call for Collaboration in Teacher Education. Focus on Exceptional Children, 38(2). https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v38i2.6816
40. Young, K. S. (2008). Physical and social organization of space in a combined credential programme: Implications for inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12(5–6), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110802377508