Barriers to Green Procurement Adoption Among U.S. Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)


Authors : Gloria Baidoo

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 8 - August


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/bdznfekh

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/y8w2jvst

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25aug1393

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : The aim of the study was to investigate the reasons behind the existence of green procurement practice and the barriers to the adoption of green procurement among the small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in California, both internal and external. A quantitative cross-sectional approach was deployed, given the elucidations through the Institutional Theory, Resource-Based View (RBV), and Stakeholder Theory. A purposive sampling method that involved the use of structured questionnaires to collect data was carried out on 400 SMEs in various industries. SPSS version 27 was used to perform descriptive statistics, correlation, and regression analysis. The results indicate that SMEs are performing well in terms of the adoption of green procurement by including environmental considerations in procurement policies and practices. These two internal factors, leadership commitment and organisational culture, were found to be significant drivers, but employee awareness and financial constraint, on the other hand, did not demonstrate any statistical significance. Regulatory and policy barriers had positive effects at the external level on the adoption of green procurement, whereas supplier and market constraints did not evoke any significant effect.

References :

  1. Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Afum, E., Agyemang, M., Adu, G., & Kusi, L. Y. (2020). Exploring financial, environmental and social sustainability performance relationships: CEO's tenure   moderation perspective. Sustainability, 12(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041461
  2. Alzawati, M. A., Rahman, I. K. A., & Adamu, I. (2021). Barriers to implementing green supply chain management in SMEs: Evidence from Malaysia. Management Science Letters, 11(3),      931–940. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.9.030
  3. Anaman, P. D., Ahmed, I. A., Suleman, A.-R., & Dzakah, G. A. (2023). Environmentally    Sustainable Business Practices in Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises: A Sub-Saharan African Country Perspective. Business Perspectives and Research, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/22785337231162740
  4. Baidoo, G. (2025). Using Big Data Analytics to Optimise Inventory Management in the U.S. E Commerce Warehouses. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), XII(VII), 1580–1594. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.120700161
  5. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  6. Bassi, A., & Guidolin, M. (2021). Green procurement in SMEs: The role of entrepreneurs’   environmental orientation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 124962.   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124962
  7. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and      collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147 160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  8. Fatoki, O. (2022). Internal and external constraints to green procurement adoption by SMEs in South Africa. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 14(3), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSE.2022.123456
  9. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
  10. Geng, Y., Zhu, Q., & Haight, M. (2019). Green supply chain management in China: Drivers, practices and performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571011001707
  11. Khan, S. A. R., Yu, Z., Umar, M., Tanveer, M., & Chen, S. (2022). Adoption of green supply chain   management practices and firm performance: Moderating role of stakeholder pressure.   Journal of Cleaner Production, 330, 129784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129784
  12. Khan, S. A. R., Yu, Z., Tanveer, M., & Chattha, M. U. (2023). Impact of institutional pressures on     green procurement adoption: Evidence from SMEs. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 35, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.01.002
  13. Liu, Y., Hu, X., & Han, Z. (2021). Resource-based view of green procurement adoption in SMEs:      Evidence from China. Sustainability, 13(9), 4850. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094850
  14. Martinez-Perales, B. R., Frías-Aceituno, J. V., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2023). Institutional   pressures and environmental strategies: The mediating role of green supply chain       management. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3082
  15. Miroshnychenko, I., Barontini, R., & Testa, F. (2022). Green procurement and firm performance: The role of environmental management systems and institutional pressures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(2), 565–578. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2907
  16. Pavot, W., Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Further validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57(1), 149–161.    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5701_17
  17. Testa, F., Iraldo, F., & Daddi, T. (2020). The effectiveness of green procurement policies: A review. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 26(1), 100578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2019.100578
  18. Testa, F., Iraldo, F., & Daddi, T. (2022). The influence of institutional pressures on green public procurement practices: Empirical evidence from local authorities. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 65(3), 475–494.    https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1918952
  19. U.S. Small Business Administration. (2023). 2023 Small Business Profile.                https://www.sba.gov/advocacy/small-business-profiles-states-and-territories-2023
  20. Younis, H., Sundarakani, B., & Vel, P. (2022). Barriers to green procurement adoption in SMEs:        Evidence from the UAE. Journal of Cleaner Production, 333, 130112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130112

The aim of the study was to investigate the reasons behind the existence of green procurement practice and the barriers to the adoption of green procurement among the small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in California, both internal and external. A quantitative cross-sectional approach was deployed, given the elucidations through the Institutional Theory, Resource-Based View (RBV), and Stakeholder Theory. A purposive sampling method that involved the use of structured questionnaires to collect data was carried out on 400 SMEs in various industries. SPSS version 27 was used to perform descriptive statistics, correlation, and regression analysis. The results indicate that SMEs are performing well in terms of the adoption of green procurement by including environmental considerations in procurement policies and practices. These two internal factors, leadership commitment and organisational culture, were found to be significant drivers, but employee awareness and financial constraint, on the other hand, did not demonstrate any statistical significance. Regulatory and policy barriers had positive effects at the external level on the adoption of green procurement, whereas supplier and market constraints did not evoke any significant effect.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
30 - November - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe