Authors :
Gloria Baidoo
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 8 - August
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/bdznfekh
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/y8w2jvst
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25aug1393
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.
Abstract :
The aim of the study was to investigate the reasons behind the existence of green procurement practice and the
barriers to the adoption of green procurement among the small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in California, both
internal and external. A quantitative cross-sectional approach was deployed, given the elucidations through the Institutional
Theory, Resource-Based View (RBV), and Stakeholder Theory. A purposive sampling method that involved the use of
structured questionnaires to collect data was carried out on 400 SMEs in various industries. SPSS version 27 was used to
perform descriptive statistics, correlation, and regression analysis. The results indicate that SMEs are performing well in
terms of the adoption of green procurement by including environmental considerations in procurement policies and
practices. These two internal factors, leadership commitment and organisational culture, were found to be significant
drivers, but employee awareness and financial constraint, on the other hand, did not demonstrate any statistical significance.
Regulatory and policy barriers had positive effects at the external level on the adoption of green procurement, whereas
supplier and market constraints did not evoke any significant effect.
References :
- Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Afum, E., Agyemang, M., Adu, G., & Kusi, L. Y. (2020). Exploring financial, environmental and social sustainability performance relationships: CEO's tenure moderation perspective. Sustainability, 12(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041461
- Alzawati, M. A., Rahman, I. K. A., & Adamu, I. (2021). Barriers to implementing green supply chain management in SMEs: Evidence from Malaysia. Management Science Letters, 11(3), 931–940. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.9.030
- Anaman, P. D., Ahmed, I. A., Suleman, A.-R., & Dzakah, G. A. (2023). Environmentally Sustainable Business Practices in Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises: A Sub-Saharan African Country Perspective. Business Perspectives and Research, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/22785337231162740
- Baidoo, G. (2025). Using Big Data Analytics to Optimise Inventory Management in the U.S. E Commerce Warehouses. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), XII(VII), 1580–1594. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.120700161
- Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
- Bassi, A., & Guidolin, M. (2021). Green procurement in SMEs: The role of entrepreneurs’ environmental orientation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 124962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124962
- DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147 160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
- Fatoki, O. (2022). Internal and external constraints to green procurement adoption by SMEs in South Africa. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 14(3), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSE.2022.123456
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
- Geng, Y., Zhu, Q., & Haight, M. (2019). Green supply chain management in China: Drivers, practices and performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571011001707
- Khan, S. A. R., Yu, Z., Umar, M., Tanveer, M., & Chen, S. (2022). Adoption of green supply chain management practices and firm performance: Moderating role of stakeholder pressure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 330, 129784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129784
- Khan, S. A. R., Yu, Z., Tanveer, M., & Chattha, M. U. (2023). Impact of institutional pressures on green procurement adoption: Evidence from SMEs. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 35, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.01.002
- Liu, Y., Hu, X., & Han, Z. (2021). Resource-based view of green procurement adoption in SMEs: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 13(9), 4850. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094850
- Martinez-Perales, B. R., Frías-Aceituno, J. V., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2023). Institutional pressures and environmental strategies: The mediating role of green supply chain management. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3082
- Miroshnychenko, I., Barontini, R., & Testa, F. (2022). Green procurement and firm performance: The role of environmental management systems and institutional pressures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(2), 565–578. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2907
- Pavot, W., Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Further validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57(1), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5701_17
- Testa, F., Iraldo, F., & Daddi, T. (2020). The effectiveness of green procurement policies: A review. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 26(1), 100578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2019.100578
- Testa, F., Iraldo, F., & Daddi, T. (2022). The influence of institutional pressures on green public procurement practices: Empirical evidence from local authorities. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 65(3), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1918952
- U.S. Small Business Administration. (2023). 2023 Small Business Profile. https://www.sba.gov/advocacy/small-business-profiles-states-and-territories-2023
- Younis, H., Sundarakani, B., & Vel, P. (2022). Barriers to green procurement adoption in SMEs: Evidence from the UAE. Journal of Cleaner Production, 333, 130112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130112
The aim of the study was to investigate the reasons behind the existence of green procurement practice and the
barriers to the adoption of green procurement among the small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in California, both
internal and external. A quantitative cross-sectional approach was deployed, given the elucidations through the Institutional
Theory, Resource-Based View (RBV), and Stakeholder Theory. A purposive sampling method that involved the use of
structured questionnaires to collect data was carried out on 400 SMEs in various industries. SPSS version 27 was used to
perform descriptive statistics, correlation, and regression analysis. The results indicate that SMEs are performing well in
terms of the adoption of green procurement by including environmental considerations in procurement policies and
practices. These two internal factors, leadership commitment and organisational culture, were found to be significant
drivers, but employee awareness and financial constraint, on the other hand, did not demonstrate any statistical significance.
Regulatory and policy barriers had positive effects at the external level on the adoption of green procurement, whereas
supplier and market constraints did not evoke any significant effect.