Authors : Cruz Valan Ashok; Dr. Vikas Kumar

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/mrs4n3pu

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/ytchkart

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr1552

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Massive advancement in technology forces the teaching strategy to transform itself from traditional face to face teaching-learning methods to online technological teaching-learning strategies. Learning by merging traditional with technical oriented pedagogy is the essential need of the hour. With the development in technology, tools, its usage, benefits and interest in its adaption by recent generation, make blended learning models mandatory in classrooms. Hence this study analyzes the effectiveness, benefits, suitability and challenges of using Blended Learning Models by school students, college students and teachers. An empirical survey was carried out among teachers and students of various levels using structured Likert scale questionnaire and data were collected on awareness about the models, its effectiveness, benefits, difficulties and challenges in technological utilization. Further this study discovers the most commonly used model and best suitable model for different educational levels. SPSS was used to evaluate data to understand the perception across various level groups. The analysis provides the effectiveness of Blended Learning and suggests recommendations for further development and improvement in its implementation.

Keywords : Blended Learning Models, Awareness, Effectiveness, Most Used and Most Needed Models.

References :

1. Rahmani, J., and Khlifehsoltani, M. 2019. “Blended learning (new approach in instruction).” Academic Journal of Psychological Studies. 8(1):20-28.
2. Graham, C.R. 2005. Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. Pfeiffer Publishing: San Francisco.
3. Bryan, A., and Volchenkova, K. 2016. “Blended learning: definition, models, implications for higher education.”  Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Education. Educational Sciences. 8(2): 24–30.
4. Ravi, Kumar, Pushpa, Patra and Apurba. 2025. “Chalk and Board Teaching and its Integration with the Modern Educational Methods.” National Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 13: 165-167.
5. Tayebinik, M., and Puteh, M.M. 2013. Blended Learning or E-Learning?. Rhetoric Educator: Communication.
6. Hasan, H.S. 2024. ‘Blended Learning for Skill Development in EFL Teacher Preparation, Pedagogia.” Jurnal Pendidikan.13 (2): 320-326.
7. Faustino, A.C., and Kaur, I. 2021. “Blended Learning Models: Perspectives’ in Higher Education.” Advances in Engineering Research, In: International Joint Conference on Science and Engineering (IJCSE).209: 185-190.
8. Bidari, S., and Hafeez, M. 2023. “Evolution and Impact of Blended Learning in Higher Education: A Brief Systematic Review from 2010 to 2022.” Journal of Education and Research. 13(2): 24-54.
9. Schmidt, B. 2013.  “Learning Strategy and Students' Perception of Different Learning Options in a Blended Learning Environment - A Case Study of a First Year Engineering Course.” In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Supported Education. 321-330.
10. Martyn, M. 2003. “The Hybrid Online Model: Good Practice.” Educause Quarterly. 26: 18-23.
11. Protsiv, M., Rosales-Klintz, S., Bwanga, F., Zwarenstein, M., and Atkins, S. 2016. “Blended learning across universities in a South-North-South collaboration: a case study.”  Health Res Policy Syst. 14(1): 67: 1-12.
12. Huachizaca, V., Granda, J., Castillo, K., Quezada, J. P., and Herrera, R. 2022. “Effects of Blended English Learning in Superior Education: A Case Study.”  AsiaCALL Online Journal. 13(5): 83–99.
13. Ashraf, M. A., Yang, M., Zhang, Y., Denden, M., Tlili, A., Liu, J., and Burgos, D. 2021.  “A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews on Blended Learning: Trends, Gaps and Future Directions.” Psychology Research and Behavior Management. 14: 1525–1541.
14. Author, Iyer, Shankar and Jain, S. 2021. Blended Learning is the future of Education. 113-136.
15. Nayak, Nishivijita, Behera, Deepak, Dutta, and Mausumi. 2025. “Role of Digital Technology in Transforming Chalk and Talk Classroom Teaching into Constructive and Inclusive Learning Environment.” International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology. 10(6):  2203-2208.
16. Graham, C.R., Allen, S., and Ure, D. 2005. “Benefits and Challenges of Blended Learning Environments”. Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology.
17. Osman, N., and Hamzah, M.I. 2020. “Impact of Implementing Blended Learning on Students' Interest and Motivation.” Universal Journal of Educational Research. 8(4):1483-1490.
18. Kozłowska, E., and Howard, R. 2019. “Chalk & Talk or Swipe & Skype?” Zeszyty Naukowe Wydziału Elektrotechniki I Automatyki Politechniki Gdańskiej. 17-20.
19. Corcoran, G. 2009. “Blended learning lead institute.” In proceedings of the ALN Conference Workshop on Blended Learning & Higher Education November. 1-25.
20. Pereira, J.A., Pleguezuelos, E., Merí, A., Molina-Ros, A., Molina-Tomás, M.C., and Masdeu, C. 2007. “Effectiveness of using blended learning strategies for teaching and learning human anatomy.” Med Educ. 41(2): 189-95.
21. Utts, J., Sommer, B., Acredolo, C., Maher, M. W., and Matthews, H. R. 2003.  “A study comparing traditional and hybrid internet-based instruction in introductory statistics classes.” Journal of Statistics Education. 11(3): 1-14.
22. Rogers, P. 2001. “Traditions to Transformations: The Forced Evolution of Higher Education.”  AACE Journal. 9: 47-60.