Blockchain's Smart Contract Technology on the Performance of the Small-Scale Agricultural Farms in Kenya


Authors : Anne Mwende Kaluvu; Dr. Lawrence Nderu; Dr. Oluoch Oluoch

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 7 - July


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yaj3yz9c

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/yu6ebde3

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jul1311

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : In Kenya’s small-scale agricultural sector, where productivity is often hindered by limited credit access, delayed payments, and exploitative intermediaries, blockchain-based smart contracts offer a bold new frontier. This study explores how these automated, self-executing agreements built on decentralized blockchain platforms are reshaping the performance landscape for smallholder farms. By enabling secure, transparent, and trustless transactions, smart contracts promise to streamline value chains, enforce agreements without intermediaries, and accelerate financial flows. Guided by a pragmatic philosophy and a mixed-methods design, this research draws on both quantitative and qualitative data. Focus group discussions with village champions provided contextual insight into farmers’ lived experiences with smart contract platforms. A census of 52 blockchain-enabled agricultural firms yielded structured survey data, analyzed using descriptive statistics, thematic coding, Pearson and Spearman correlation tests, and regression modeling. Findings show that smart contracts significantly improve farm performance by enhancing payment reliability, reducing transactional friction, and increasing transparency in financial and operational records. The technology also fosters trust and coordination among stakeholders, while facilitating access to financing and new markets. Ultimately, this study underscores the transformative potential of blockchain smart contracts in small-scale farming not only as a technical innovation but as a catalyst for inclusive agricultural development. However, realizing this potential at scale will require sustained investment, policy support, and farmer-centered digital literacy initiatives.

Keywords : Blockchain Technology, Performance, Small-Scale Agricultural Farms, Smart Contract Technology, Kenya.

References :

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. Akella, G. K., Wibowo, S., Grandhi, S., & Mubarak, S. (2023). A systematic review of blockchain technology adoption barriers and enablers for smart and sustainable agriculture. Big Data Cognition and Computation, 7(2), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7020086
  3. Andrade, C. (2020). The inconvenient truth about convenience and purposive samples. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 43(1), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620977000
  4. Bore, J. K., Maina, M. P., & Omwenga, I. (2020). Adoption of blockchain technology in enhancing transparency and accountability in the management of agricultural value chains in Kenya. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 10(12), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.10.12.2020.p10873
  5. Bore, N., Kinai, A., Waweru, P., Wambugu, I., Mutahi, J., Kemunto, E., Bryant, R., & Weldemariam, K. (2020). ADW: Blockchain-enabled small-scale farm digitization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.06862. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2003.06862
  6. Business Wire (2023). Nearly 7,000 Kenyan farmers protected by the Lemonade Crypto Climate Coalition. Business Wire. pp. 1–3. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20230328005342/en/Nearly-7000-Kenyan-Farmers-Protected-by-the-Lemonade-Crypto-Climate-Coalition
  7. Casino, F., Dasaklis, T. K., & Patsakis, C. (2019). A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: Current status, classification and open issues. Telematics and Informatics, 36, 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.11.006
  8. CoinDCX. (2023, June 7). Smart contracts on blockchain: Benefits & future potential explored. CoinDCX. https://coindcx.com/blog/blockchain/smart-contracts-on-blockchain/
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  10. Davies, S. (2018). PwC's global blockchain survey. Source Media. Archived from the original on January 25, 2021. Retrieved February 1, 2021, from https://www.financialwebsite.com
  11. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  12. Dewey, J., 1938. Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
  13. Dhillon, R., & Moncur, Q. (2023). Small-scale farming: A review of challenges and potential opportunities offered by technological advancements. Sustainability, 15(21), 15478. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115478
  14. Ehsan, I., Irfan Khalid, M., Ricci, L., Iqbal, J., Alabrah, A., Ullah, S. S., Alfakih, T. M., & Gupta, P. (2022). A conceptual model for blockchain-based agriculture food supply chain system. Scientific Programming, 2022, Article 7358354. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7358354
  15. El Mane, A., Chihab, Y., Tatane, K., & Korchiyne, R. (2022). Agriculture supply chain management based on blockchain architecture and smart contracts. Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing, 2022, 8011525. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8011525
  16. Garg, A., Tyagi, A., Patel, A., & Raj, D. (2023). Blockchain and decentralized apps. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12536.
  17. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. State University of New York Press.
  18. Hang, C., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 58(7), 2082–2095. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1641413
  19. Hayes, A. (2024). Blockchain facts: What is it, how it works, and how it can be used. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/blockchain.asp
  20. Hedera (2023). Smart contract use cases. Hedera Learning Hub. pp. 1–5. https://hedera.com/learning/smart-contracts/smart-contract-use-cases
  21. Hema, S., & Manickavasagan, M. (2024). Blockchain implementation for food safety in supply chain: A review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 23(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.70002
  22. Higgins S. (2017) AXA is using Ethereum’s blockchain for a new flight insurance product. CoinDesk, pp. 1–4. https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2017/09/13/axa-is-using-ethereums-blockchain-for-a-new-flight-insurance-product/
  23. Kamilaris, A., Fonts, A., & Prenafeta-Boldú, F. X. (2019). The rise of blockchain technology in agriculture and food supply chains. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 91, 640–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.034
  24. Kim, H. M., & Laskowski, M. (2018). Toward an ontology-driven blockchain design for supply-chain provenance. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 25(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.1424
  25. Kothari, C. R. (2009). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques (2nd ed.). New Age International Publishers, New Delhi. pp. 160–165.
  26. Kothari, C. R., & Garg, G. (2014). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (3rd ed.). New Age International.
  27. Lee, N. M., Varshney, L. R., Michelson, H. C., Goldsmith, P., & Davis, A. (2022). Digital trust substitution technologies to support smallholder livelihoods in Sub-Saharan Africa. Global Food Security, 32, 100604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100604
  28. Mugenda, O.M. & Mugenda, A.G., 2003. Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Nairobi: African Centre for Technology Studies (ACTS).
  29. Mukherjee, A. A., Singh, R. K., Mishra, R., & Bag, S. (2022). Application of blockchain technology for sustainability development in agricultural supply chain: Justification framework. Operations Management Research, 15, 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-021-00200-5
  30. Mwewa, T., Lungu, G., Turyasingura, B., Umer, Y., Uwimbabazi, A., Kayusi, F., & Chavula, P. (2025). Blockchain technology: Improving agricultural supply chain efficiency and transparency – A review. Asian Basic and Applied Research Journal, 7(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.56557/abaarj/2025/v7i1159
  31. Neuman, W. L. (2009). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson.
  32. Parra-Moyano, J., & Ross, O. (2017). KYC optimization using distributed ledger technology. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59(2), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0504-2
  33. Pothula, S. R. (2023). Investigations of agri-blockchain technology framework in agriculture. Journal of Agriculture, Science and Technology, 22(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.4314/jagst.v22i1.2
  34. Pranto, T. H., Noman, A. A., Mahmud, A., & Haque, A. K. B. (2021). Blockchain and smart contract for IoT-enabled smart agriculture. PeerJ Computer Science, 7, e407. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.407
  35. Rehman, I. U., Andleeb, S., Ashfaq, M., Akram, N., & Akram, M. W. (2023). Blockchain-enabled smart agriculture: Enhancing data-driven decision-making and ensuring food security. Journal of Cleaner Production, 427, 138900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138900.
  36. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
  37. SIS International Research (2023). Focus groups offer rich, detailed data and diverse perspectives through interactive discussions. SIS International Market Research. https://www.sisinternational.com/solutions/focus-groups/join-focus-groups
  38. Steckler, A., McLeroy, K. R., Goodman, R. M., Bird, S. T., & McCormick, L. (1992). Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: An introduction. Health Education Quarterly, 19(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819201900101
  39. U.Cumberlands. (2023). Keep the world safe with blockchain technology. University of the Cumberlands. https://www.ucumberlands.edu/blog/keep-the-world-safe-with-blockchain-technology
  40. USAID. (2023, November 8). United States announces $3 million EDGE fund partnership in Ecuador to support small-scale farmers. U.S. Agency for International Development. https://www.usaid.gov/news-information/press-releases/nov-08-2023-united-states-announces-3-million-edge-fund-partnership-ecuador-support-small-scale-farmers
  41. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27, 425–478.
  42. Wahome, A. M., Kiema, J. B. K., Mulaku, G. C., & Mukoko, I. (2024). Characterization of small-scale farmers and assessment of their access to crop production information in selected counties of Kenya. Agricultural Sciences, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2024.155032
  43. Xia, J., Li, H., & He, Z. (2023). The effect of blockchain technology on supply chain collaboration: A case study of Lenovo. Systems, 11(6), 299. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11060299
  44. Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2017). An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. 2017 IEEE International Congress on Big Data (BigData Congress), 557–564. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigDataCongress.2017.85
  45. Zikmund, W. G. (2003). Business research methods (7th ed.). Thomson/South-Western.

In Kenya’s small-scale agricultural sector, where productivity is often hindered by limited credit access, delayed payments, and exploitative intermediaries, blockchain-based smart contracts offer a bold new frontier. This study explores how these automated, self-executing agreements built on decentralized blockchain platforms are reshaping the performance landscape for smallholder farms. By enabling secure, transparent, and trustless transactions, smart contracts promise to streamline value chains, enforce agreements without intermediaries, and accelerate financial flows. Guided by a pragmatic philosophy and a mixed-methods design, this research draws on both quantitative and qualitative data. Focus group discussions with village champions provided contextual insight into farmers’ lived experiences with smart contract platforms. A census of 52 blockchain-enabled agricultural firms yielded structured survey data, analyzed using descriptive statistics, thematic coding, Pearson and Spearman correlation tests, and regression modeling. Findings show that smart contracts significantly improve farm performance by enhancing payment reliability, reducing transactional friction, and increasing transparency in financial and operational records. The technology also fosters trust and coordination among stakeholders, while facilitating access to financing and new markets. Ultimately, this study underscores the transformative potential of blockchain smart contracts in small-scale farming not only as a technical innovation but as a catalyst for inclusive agricultural development. However, realizing this potential at scale will require sustained investment, policy support, and farmer-centered digital literacy initiatives.

Keywords : Blockchain Technology, Performance, Small-Scale Agricultural Farms, Smart Contract Technology, Kenya.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
31 - December - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe