Boosting SME Market Performance Through Competitive Strategies and Innovation in Laos


Authors : Thongvanh Sirivanh; Soukzana Ladtakoun; Anousone Thipduangchai; Niddavone Vongsanga

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 10 - October


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yzzsjryw

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/mvhphrct

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25oct907

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : There is no other way to describe Laos’s economy other than saying it is vibrant. There is so much tourism going on and the agriculture and retail sectors are thriving. Along with the other businesses, these types of businesses make up 90% of the Laos economy, providing jobs and opportunities for the business owners. SMEs are Laos’s economy backbone, with tourism, agriculture, and retails sectors employing 90% of the business and contributing 40% to the GDP. Unfortunately, the SMEs are held back by limited funds, low innovation, and competition. With the 0.04% of GDP allocated to R&D, it is clear Laos is not doing enough and their economy does not seem to be thriving much because of it. This paper investigates the role of cost and differentiated leaderships strategies, with core and edge incrementally and radically core anchored innovations on their respective domains. These innovations are indirectly linked to the rocks held on by perception towards the risks involved. With the help of the AMOS software and a survey conducted on 69 SMEs in Laos, it was produced that the edge core for uniqueness and core for efficiency innovations indirectly improves the efficiency. The majority of the perception risks tend to moderate these relations, and with Laos being a rather cautious nation, this is not uncommon. It is advised that low-risk innovations are paired with the strategies while the government and policymakers aid these SMEs with the rigid training and grants SMEs need to create the right balance. There was a problem with the scope of the study since a longitudinal study was not adopted.

Keywords : Market Performance, Competitive Strategies, Innovation Management, Lao PDR

References :

  1. Agyapong, A., Ellis, F., & Domeher, D. (2016). Competitive strategy and performance of family businesses: moderating effect of managerial and innovative capabilities. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 28(6), 449–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2016.1217727
  2. Akis, E. (2015). Innovation and Competitive Power. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1311–1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.304
  3. Ali, M. (2021). Imitation or innovation: To what extent do exploitative learning and exploratory learning foster imitation strategy and innovation strategy for sustained competitive advantage?✰. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 165(January 2020), 120527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120527
  4. Asian Development Bank. (2021). Transforming Agriculture in Asia. In Asian Developement Bank (Vol. 54, Issue 1). https://www.adb.org/publications/asian-development-outlook-2021-update
  1. ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK. (2020). INNOVATE INDONESIA : unlocking growth through technological transformation.
  2. Barbosa Ferreira, J. A., Coelho, A., & Weersma, L. A. (2019). The mediating effect of strategic orientation, innovation capabilities and managerial capabilities among exploration and exploitation, competitive advantage and firm’s performance. Contaduria y Administracion, 64(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.22201/fca.24488410e.2019.1918
  3. Bayraktar, C. A., Hancerliogullari, G., Cetinguc, B., & Calisir, F. (2017). Competitive strategies, innovation, and firm performance: an empirical study in a developing economy environment. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 29(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1194973
  4. Bereznoi, A. (2015). Business Model Innovation in Corporate Competitive Strategy. Problems of Economic Transition, 57(8), 14–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611991.2014.1042313
  5. Carr, J. C., & Sequeira, J. M. (2007). Prior family business exposure as intergenerational influence and entrepreneurial intent: A Theory of Planned Behavior approach. Journal of Business Research, 60(10), 1090–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.016
  6. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
  7. Dereli, D. D. (2015). Innovation Management in Global Competition and Competitive Advantage. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1365–1370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.323
  8. Distanont, A., & Khongmalai, O. (2020). The role of innovation in creating a competitive advantage. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 41(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.07.009
  9. Eiadat, Y., Kelly, A., Roche, F., & Eyadat, H. (2008). Green and competitive? An empirical test of the mediating role of environmental innovation strategy. Journal of World Business, 43(2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2007.11.012
  10. Farida, I., & Setiawan, D. (2022). Business Strategies and Competitive Advantage: The Role of Performance and Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030163
  11. Fathali, A. (2016). Examining the Impact of Competitive Strategies on Corporate Innovation: An Empirical Study in Automobile Industry. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 6(2), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1/2016.6.2/1.2.135.145
  12. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research This, 18(1), 39–50.
  13. Gerguri, S., Rexhepi, G., & Ramadani, V. (2013). Innovation Strategies and Competitive Advantages. Modern Economics, 8(1), 10–26.
  1. Hair, R, A., Babin B, & Black W. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis. In Australia : Cengage: Vol. 7 edition (p. 758).
  2. Ministry of Industry and Commerce of Lao PDR. (2022). Annual Report on Economic Development.
  3. Oksanen, K., & Hautamäki, A. (2015). Sustainable Innovation: A Competitive Advantage for Innovation Ecosystems. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(10), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/934
  4. Porter, M. . (1985). Competitive Advatage. In Creating and Sustaining Competitive Advantage (pp. 1–30).
  5. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Free Press.
  6. Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 73–93.
  7. Prajogo, D. I. (2016). The strategic fit between innovation strategies and business environment in delivering business performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.037
  8. Rhyne, L. C., Teagarden, M. B., & Van den Panhuyzen, W. (2002). Technology-based competitive strategies. The relationship of cultural dimensions to new product innovation. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13(2), 249–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(02)00047-0
  9. Rubio-Andrés, M., Linuesa-Langreo, J., Gutiérrez-Broncano, S., & Sastre-Castillo, M. Á. (2024). How to improve market performance through competitive strategy and innovation in entrepreneurial SMEs. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 20(3), 1677–1706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-024-00947-9
  10. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research Methods for Buniess Students. In Pearson.
  11. Schuler, R. S., & Jackson, S. E. (1987). with Human Resource Management Practices. 1(3), 207–219.
  12. Tabachinick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. In Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews (6th ed., Vol. 28, Issue 8). Pearson. https://doi.org/10.1037/022267
  13. Weerawardena, J., & Mort, G. S. (2012). Competitive strategy in socially entrepreneurial nonprofit organizations: Innovation and differentiation. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 31(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.11.034
  14. Wijekoon, A., Salunke, S., & Athaide, G. A. (2021). Customer heterogeneity and innovation-based competitive strategy: A review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(3), 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12576
  15. Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1994). The financial implications of fit between competitive strategy and innovation types and sources. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 5(2), 183–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/1047-8310(94)90002-7

There is no other way to describe Laos’s economy other than saying it is vibrant. There is so much tourism going on and the agriculture and retail sectors are thriving. Along with the other businesses, these types of businesses make up 90% of the Laos economy, providing jobs and opportunities for the business owners. SMEs are Laos’s economy backbone, with tourism, agriculture, and retails sectors employing 90% of the business and contributing 40% to the GDP. Unfortunately, the SMEs are held back by limited funds, low innovation, and competition. With the 0.04% of GDP allocated to R&D, it is clear Laos is not doing enough and their economy does not seem to be thriving much because of it. This paper investigates the role of cost and differentiated leaderships strategies, with core and edge incrementally and radically core anchored innovations on their respective domains. These innovations are indirectly linked to the rocks held on by perception towards the risks involved. With the help of the AMOS software and a survey conducted on 69 SMEs in Laos, it was produced that the edge core for uniqueness and core for efficiency innovations indirectly improves the efficiency. The majority of the perception risks tend to moderate these relations, and with Laos being a rather cautious nation, this is not uncommon. It is advised that low-risk innovations are paired with the strategies while the government and policymakers aid these SMEs with the rigid training and grants SMEs need to create the right balance. There was a problem with the scope of the study since a longitudinal study was not adopted.

Keywords : Market Performance, Competitive Strategies, Innovation Management, Lao PDR

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
31 - December - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe