Cementing “Optimization Techniques” in Social Sciences Research: Towards Non-Mathematical Optimization Techniques for the Social Sciences


Authors : Sujay Rao Mandavilli

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 7 - July


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/bd9pa2pb

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/b6n29faz

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jul1866

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : The objective of this paper is to propose optimization strategies that can be applied with equal efficacy in various fields of the social sciences. Optimization is a widely used strategy and technique in mathematics and statistics. While some effort has been made to extend these techniques for various in the social sciences, we believe that they have not been able to break free entirely from their mathematical mold. Therefore, we essentially strive to adopt a non-mathematical approach that would at best border on a quasi-statistical approach, a term that we proposed, needed to be popularized, in a previous paper. We begin this paper by reviewing and presenting the core essentials of optimization techniques as they are currently applied and used in mathematics, and then present the essentials of our approach as a series of inter-dependant steps. We do hope anticipate and expect that this paper will go some way in ensuring that the social sciences break free from a mathematical format, and evolve and mature in a qualitative or a non-statistical direction. This is also naturally in keeping with the essential requirements of our globalization of science movement.

References :

  1. Panos M. PardalosApproximation and Complexity in Numerical Optimization: Continuous and Discrete Problems, SpringerISBN 978-1-44194829-8, (2000)
  2. Panos M. PardalosApproximation and Complexity in Numerical Optimization: Continuous and Discrete Problems, SpringerISBN 978-1-44194829-8, (2000)
  3. Panos M. Pardalos, and Mauricio G. C. Resende(Eds.):Handbook of Applied Optimization、Oxford Univ Pr on Demand, ISBN 978-0-19512594-8, (2002).
  4. Wil Michiels, Emile Aarts, and Jan Korst: Theoretical Aspects of Local Search, Springer, ISBN 978-3-64207148-5, (2006).
  5. Der-San Chen, Robert G. Batson, and Yu Dang: Applied Integer Programming: Modeling and Solution,Wiley,ISBN 978-0-47037306-4, (2010).
  6. Mykel J. Kochenderfer and Tim A. Wheeler: Algorithms for Optimization, The MIT Press, ISBN 978-0-26203942-0, (2019).
  7. Vladislav Bukshtynov: Optimization: Success in Practice, CRC Press (Taylor & Francis), ISBN 978-1-03222947-8, (2023) .
  8. Rosario Toscano: Solving Optimization Problems with the Heuristic Kalman Algorithm: New Stochastic Methods, Springer, ISBN 978-3-031-52458-5 (2024).
  9. Immanuel M. Bomze, Tibor Csendes, Reiner Horst and Panos M. Pardalos: Developments in Global Optimization, Kluwer Academic, ISBN 978-1-4419-4768-0 (2010).
  10. Vo, Thuy D.; Paul Lee, W.N.; Palsson, Bernhard O. (May 2007). "Systems analysis of energy metabolism elucidates the affected respiratory chain complex in Leigh's syndrome". Molecular Genetics and Metabolism91 (1): 15–22
  11. Gerard Sierksma; Yori Zwols (2015). Linear and Integer Optimization: Theory and Practice. CRC Press
  12. Gerard Sierksma; Diptesh Ghosh (2010). Networks in Action; Text and Computer Exercises in Network Optimization. Springer
  13. Richard Vahrenkamp: Mathematical Management – Operations Research in the United States and Western Europe, 1945 – 1990, in: Management Revue – Socio-Economic Studies, vol. 34 (2023), issue 1, pp. 69–91
  14. R. E. Bellman, Dynamic Programming, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1957
  15. Abraham Charnes, William W. Cooper, Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming, Volumes I and II, New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1961
  16. Hsu, Feng-Hsiung (1999). "IBM's Deep Blue chess grandmaster chips". IEEE Micro19 (2). Los Alamitos, CA, USA: IEEE Computer Society: 70–81
  17. Gaffal, Margit; Padilla Gálvez, Jesús (2014). Dynamics of Rational Negotiation: Game Theory, Language Games and Forms of Life. Springer.
  18. Figge, F.; Schaltegger, S.: What is Stakeholder Value? Developing a Catchphrase into a Benchmarking Tool. Lüneburg/Geneva/Paris: University of Lüneburg/Pictet/ in association with United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), 2000
  19. Post, James (2002). Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth. Stanford University Press
  20. Mancosu, P. (ed., 1998), From Hilbert to Brouwer. The Debate on the Foundations of Mathematics in the 1920s, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  21. Abattouy, Mohammed; Renn, Jürgen; Weinig, Paul (2001). "Transmission as Transformation: The Translation Movements in the Medieval East and West in a Comparative Perspective". Science in Context14 (1–2). Cambridge University Press: 1–12
  22. O’Brien, J & Marakas, G. (2011). Supporting Decision Making. In B.Gordon (Ed.), Management Information Systems 10e (p. 409). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin
  23. Miner, J. B. (2003). "The rated importance, scientific validity, and practical usefulness of organizational behavior theories: A quantitative review". Academy of Management Learning & Education2 (3): 250–268
  24.  Locke, E. A., Chah, D., Harrison, S. & Lustgarten, N. (1989). "Separating the effects of goal specificity from goal level". Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 43 (2): 270–287
  25. Steven Maras. Screenwriting: History, Theory and Practice. Wallflower Press, 2009. p. 91
  26. Xiaoqi Yang, K. L. Teo, Lou Caccetta (Eds.):Optimization Methods and Applications,Springer, ISBN 978-0-79236866-3, (2001).
  27. Panos M. Pardalos, and Mauricio G. C. Resende(Eds.):Handbook of Applied Optimization、Oxford Univ Pr on Demand, ISBN 978-0-19512594-8, (2002).
  28. Williams, Karel, Colin Haslam and John Williams, "Ford versus 'Fordism': The Beginning of Mass Production?" Work, Employment & Society, Vol. 6, No. 4, 517–555 (1992), stress on Ford's flexibility and commitment to continuous improvements
  29. Differentiating strong data and evidence from weak data and evidence: Another heuristic for use in general and social sciences research Sujay Rao Mandavilli Published in IJISRT, June 2025
  30. Incorporating the concept of "Fuzzy logic" in social sciences research: An important heuristic for more diverse and meaningful social sciences research Sujay Rao Mandavilli Published in SSRN, June 2025
  31. Amplifying the importance of synchronic-diachronic approaches in social sciences research: Unleashing the power of this technique for better sociocultural analysis Sujay Rao Mandavill Published in IJISRT, July 2025
  32. Quantifying, measuring, and correlating sociocultural variables: An indispensable technique for diverse fields of the social sciences Sujay Rao Mandavilli Published in IJISRT, July 2025
  33. Towards 360 degree approaches to hypothesis formulation and evaluation: Another epochal milestone in twenty-first century science Sujay Rao Mandavilli Published in IJISRT, July 2025
  34. Aligning theorization and hypothesis-building with cultural and cross-cultural frames of reference: A heuristic aid to better theorization and hypothesis-building Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT June 2024
  35. Operationalizing cross-cultural research design: Practical, cost-effective, and a minimalistic application of cross-cultural research design to minimize cultural bias in research and reconcile diverse viewpoints IJISRT, April 2023 Sujay Rao Mandavilli
  36. Popularizing auto-dialectics in scientific endeavour: A potentially productive tool in the interests of better and higher-quality science Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, June 2024
  37. Paradox identification and paradox resolution in scientific endeavour: Reconciliation of contradictory rulesets in the interests of better theorization and hypothesis-building Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, January 2024
  38. Paradox identification and paradox resolution in scientific endeavour: Reconciliation of contradictory rulesets in the interests of better theorization and hypothesis-building Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, January 2024
  39. Building upon “Foundationalism” to achieve the objectives of contemporary science: How this can lead to faster scientific progress and inclusive science Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, October 2024
  40. Implementing “Epistemic coherentism” in twentyfirst century science: “Epistemic coherentism” as an essential pre-requisite of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, November 2024
  41. Instituting “Institutional coherentism” as a prerequisite for high-quality science: Another crucial step for winning the battle for consistent high-quality science Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, February 2024
  42. Emphasizing “integrationism” in twenty-first century science: Another useful tool to generate better scientific paradigms better quality science Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT October 2024
  43. Walton, Douglas (26 August 2013). Methods of Argumentation. Cambridge University Press. pp. 250–2. 
  44. Towards a formal analysis of “vested interests” as an intrinsic part of social science research techniques: Another crucial component of social and cultural progress Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, September 2024

The objective of this paper is to propose optimization strategies that can be applied with equal efficacy in various fields of the social sciences. Optimization is a widely used strategy and technique in mathematics and statistics. While some effort has been made to extend these techniques for various in the social sciences, we believe that they have not been able to break free entirely from their mathematical mold. Therefore, we essentially strive to adopt a non-mathematical approach that would at best border on a quasi-statistical approach, a term that we proposed, needed to be popularized, in a previous paper. We begin this paper by reviewing and presenting the core essentials of optimization techniques as they are currently applied and used in mathematics, and then present the essentials of our approach as a series of inter-dependant steps. We do hope anticipate and expect that this paper will go some way in ensuring that the social sciences break free from a mathematical format, and evolve and mature in a qualitative or a non-statistical direction. This is also naturally in keeping with the essential requirements of our globalization of science movement.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
31 - December - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe