Authors :
Febe Kate C. Paredes
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 6 - June
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/3a9esnkd
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/m4azt938
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jun1509
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
This review synthesizes literature on the challenges faced by teachers in implementing curriculum innovations,
with emphasis on the ILAW Framework (Intentions, Learning Experiences, Assessing Learning, and Ways Forward) in
Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE). The objective is to examine difficulties related to understanding the
framework, lesson planning, instructional resources, assessment practices, and professional development. Literature was
gathered from ERIC, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and Philippine E-Journals, covering studies published between 2016
and 2025. Findings consistently highlight that curriculum reforms increase teacher workload and require new competencies,
often without sufficient training or resources. Theories such as the Concern-Based Adoption Model (Hall & Hord, 2020) and
Fullan’s Change Theory (2016) explain how teacher concerns and readiness affect implementation. Studies reveal that
limited instructional materials, inadequate training, and insufficient administrative support hinder effective adoption of
learner-centered frameworks. While international research emphasizes the importance of professional development and
institutional support, localized studies in Philippine TLE contexts remain scarce. This synthesis underscores the need for
targeted support programs to assist teachers in adapting to curriculum reforms. Recommendations include continuous
training, provision of resources, and structured mentoring to enhance implementation of the ILAW Framework in TLE.
References :
- Alsubaie, M. A. (2016). Curriculum development: Teacher involvement in curriculum development. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 106–107.*
- Bacus, R. C. (2021). Challenges encountered by TLE teachers in instructional delivery. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 15(2), 45–58.*
- Bantugan, M. A., & Pagaran, J. R. (2021). Teacher preparedness and curriculum implementation in Philippine secondary schools. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 19(4), 1–12.*
- Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
- Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.
- Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2020). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes (5th ed.). Pearson.
- Lucas, M. R., & Corpuz, B. B. (2021). Facilitating learning: A metacognitive process (4th ed.). Lorimar Publishing.
- Richards, J. C. (2017). Curriculum development in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education. UNESCO Publishing.
This review synthesizes literature on the challenges faced by teachers in implementing curriculum innovations,
with emphasis on the ILAW Framework (Intentions, Learning Experiences, Assessing Learning, and Ways Forward) in
Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE). The objective is to examine difficulties related to understanding the
framework, lesson planning, instructional resources, assessment practices, and professional development. Literature was
gathered from ERIC, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and Philippine E-Journals, covering studies published between 2016
and 2025. Findings consistently highlight that curriculum reforms increase teacher workload and require new competencies,
often without sufficient training or resources. Theories such as the Concern-Based Adoption Model (Hall & Hord, 2020) and
Fullan’s Change Theory (2016) explain how teacher concerns and readiness affect implementation. Studies reveal that
limited instructional materials, inadequate training, and insufficient administrative support hinder effective adoption of
learner-centered frameworks. While international research emphasizes the importance of professional development and
institutional support, localized studies in Philippine TLE contexts remain scarce. This synthesis underscores the need for
targeted support programs to assist teachers in adapting to curriculum reforms. Recommendations include continuous
training, provision of resources, and structured mentoring to enhance implementation of the ILAW Framework in TLE.