Characterization of Pasture Production Systems in Makueni County of Kenya


Authors : D N Mutuku; G O Otieno; J M Ateka; S M Mutua

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 9 - September


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3pbret3x

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3we36ujd

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP1356

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Livestock feed is a key factor influencing animal production and productivity as evidenced by the increased demand for animal source foods (ASFs) to feed a growing human population in Kenya. However, there exists untapped potential of pasture commercialization and hence the need to harness the social, economic and environmental benefits in the ASALs for overall rural development. A study was conducted to characterize the existing pasture production systems in Makueni County. A purposive random sampling of 300 respondents drawn from 3 Sub-counties and 12 wards was conducted in Makueni County in January, 2021. The study aimed to characterize existing pasture production systems using a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Multivariate statistical techniques; principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Cluster Analysis (CA) were used to determine whether or not there were significant differences in the pasture production systems in Makueni County. Results of the study showed that majority (97%) of the farmers were small scale farmers (SSFs) who dedicated less than 5 acres of their land to pasture production. The mean age of small- scale farmers was 52 years compared to 55 years for the large-scale farmers (LSFs). Most of the households were male headed (83%). Most of the SSFs household heads had primary level of education level or lower while most of the large-scale household heads had secondary education and above. Majority (35%) of SSFs owned the land under pasture without a title while most of the LSFs had a title. The land under pasture for SSFs was about 2 acres with an average of 102 bales per season while LSFs had about 23 acres under pasture and produced about 1,762 bales per season. Majority (92%) grew local grass varieties and sold their pasture in form of a bale. 58% of SSFs sited NGOs as their main source of grass seeds while LSFs mainly sourced from agrovets Results of PCA revealed that 6 of the 17 components had eigen values greater than 1 and accounted for 58% of the total variance. Based on Euclidian distance, six clusters were determined using the agglomeration schedule. ANOVA analysis of the six profiles were estimated to have p-values of 0.000, suggesting the existence of significance difference between cluster 1 to 6 in relation to the 6 profiles and hence concluding the existence of variations in pasture production systems in Makueni County. Development strategies should focus on knowledge of and improved access to grass seeds to farmers as well as development of standards of the mode of sale of pasture.

Keywords : Pasture, PCA, CA, HCI, Feed Balance, Small Scale Farmers, Large Scale Farmers.

References :

  1. Gebrekidan, B. H., Heckelei, T., & Rasch, S. (2020). Characterizing farmers and farming system in Kilombero Valley Floodplain, Tanzania. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177114
  2. Karega, L., & Muthusi, J. (2019). National Feed Inventory and Feed Balance Assessment: The Case of 23 ASAL Counties of Kenya Final Report.
  3. Kenya. (2019). Makueni Climate Resilience and Food Security Project.
  4. Karl B. Fischer (1998). Clustering in the Galaxy Redshit Survey.
  5. Kfssg 2021 Short Rains Food and Nutrition Security Assessment Findings Kenya Food Security Meeting. (2022).
  6. Kuivanen, K. S., Alvarez, S., Michalscheck, M., Adjei-Nsiah, S., Descheemaeker, K., Mellon-Bedi, S., & Groot, J. C. J. (2016). Characterising the diversity of smallholder farming systems and their constraints and opportunities for innovation: A case study from the Northern Region, Ghana. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 78, 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2016.04.003
  7. Loko, Y. L. E., Gbemavo, C. D. S. J., Djedatin, G., Ewedje, E. E., Orobiyi, A., Toffa, J., Tchakpa, C., Sedah, P., & Sabot, F. (2022). Characterization of rice farming systems, production constraints and determinants of adoption of improved varieties by smallholder farmers of the Republic of Benin. Scientific Reports, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07946-2
  8. Makueni County Livestock Feed Strategy 2023-2033.
  9. Mohamed Sala, S., Otieno, D. J., Nzuma, J., & Mureithi, S. M. (2020). Determinants of pastoralists’ participation in commercial fodder markets for livelihood resilience in drylands of northern Kenya: Case of Isiolo. Pastoralism, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13570-020-00166-1
  10. Nyambo, D. G., Luhanga, E. T., & Yonah, Z. Q. (2019). A review of characterization approaches for smallholder farmers: Towards predictive farm typologies. Scientific World Journal, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6121467
  11. Ouma, O. E. (2017). Analysis Of Fodder Production and Marketing in The Rangelands Of Southern Kenya of Science in Range Management (Economics Option) in the Department of Land Resource Management and Agricultural Technology.
  12. Pothuganti, K. (2020). Overview On Principal Component Analysis Algorithm In Machine Learning. In @International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering. www.irjmets.com
  13. Sala, S. M. (2019). An Analysis of The Factors Influencing Participation Of Pastoralists In Commercial Fodder Value Chain For Livelihood Resilience In Isiolo County, Kenya.

Livestock feed is a key factor influencing animal production and productivity as evidenced by the increased demand for animal source foods (ASFs) to feed a growing human population in Kenya. However, there exists untapped potential of pasture commercialization and hence the need to harness the social, economic and environmental benefits in the ASALs for overall rural development. A study was conducted to characterize the existing pasture production systems in Makueni County. A purposive random sampling of 300 respondents drawn from 3 Sub-counties and 12 wards was conducted in Makueni County in January, 2021. The study aimed to characterize existing pasture production systems using a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Multivariate statistical techniques; principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Cluster Analysis (CA) were used to determine whether or not there were significant differences in the pasture production systems in Makueni County. Results of the study showed that majority (97%) of the farmers were small scale farmers (SSFs) who dedicated less than 5 acres of their land to pasture production. The mean age of small- scale farmers was 52 years compared to 55 years for the large-scale farmers (LSFs). Most of the households were male headed (83%). Most of the SSFs household heads had primary level of education level or lower while most of the large-scale household heads had secondary education and above. Majority (35%) of SSFs owned the land under pasture without a title while most of the LSFs had a title. The land under pasture for SSFs was about 2 acres with an average of 102 bales per season while LSFs had about 23 acres under pasture and produced about 1,762 bales per season. Majority (92%) grew local grass varieties and sold their pasture in form of a bale. 58% of SSFs sited NGOs as their main source of grass seeds while LSFs mainly sourced from agrovets Results of PCA revealed that 6 of the 17 components had eigen values greater than 1 and accounted for 58% of the total variance. Based on Euclidian distance, six clusters were determined using the agglomeration schedule. ANOVA analysis of the six profiles were estimated to have p-values of 0.000, suggesting the existence of significance difference between cluster 1 to 6 in relation to the 6 profiles and hence concluding the existence of variations in pasture production systems in Makueni County. Development strategies should focus on knowledge of and improved access to grass seeds to farmers as well as development of standards of the mode of sale of pasture.

Keywords : Pasture, PCA, CA, HCI, Feed Balance, Small Scale Farmers, Large Scale Farmers.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe