Authors :
Elwasila Mukhtar M. Elwasila; Sawsan Khair Elseid A. Mustafa; Fatima Mohammed Ahmed M. Rahma
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 1 - January
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/3mwxhnfu
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/5n7m3wdx
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14613778
Abstract :
This paper mainly aims to capture and assess
projects and initiatives that have led or are leading
innovative actions or good practices that can be
replicated or scaled up in Sudan. Methods used mainly
desk review, interviews using convenient sampling
method with a number of experts charged of different
occupation in academia, research centres, line ministries
and freelance experts. Assessment was covered selected
projects of innovative actions and good ecological and
/or socioeconomic practices implemented by
development partners. Focusing was on four crosscutting
accelerators: which is technology, innovation, data, and
complements (governance, human capital and
institutions). The secondary and primary data collected
were subjected to screening, sorting out and thematic
analysis.
Main findings of good practices adopted include;
ecosystems-based adaptation (EbA) to reduce
vulnerability and build resilience to climate change,
adaptive technology like zero tillage, improve crop
management practices etc., promotion of inclusive high-
potential value chains, that allow resilient models for
smallholder producers and other herewith described
good practices. It is recommended that the local
authorized and concerned partners to; support and scale
up and replicate action needed to form consultative
natural resource forum develops innovative tools for
EbA, to alleviate vulnerability and build resilience to
climate change; monitoring, reporting, and verification
(MRV) system in sectors; establish Regional
Observatory Centre; adoption of social protection
system; land governance, support tenure rights and land
ownership, The technologies judged as most appropriate
by producers to be incorporated into on-farm
demonstrations and strengthening the research and to be
linked to development.
Keywords :
Innovative Actions, Good Practices, Accelerators, Scale Up, Replication.
References :
- Dafalla etal, 2017 :Talaat Dafalla Sawsan el Khair Mustafa , Hamid Omer Salih Mageed: Communication & coordination platforms in IWRM and NRM,Final report of the expert group assessment , UNEP
- FAO, 2021: Forty-second Session of the Conference The Director-General’s Medium Term Plan 2022-25 and Programme of Work and Budget 2022-23
- FAO, 2021: FAO’s Strategic Framework 2022-31
- FAO, 2022: FAO Regional Conference for Africa, Thirty-second Session, Malabo, Equatorial Guinea, 11-14 April 2022, Priorities for FAO in the Region under the FAO Strategic Framework 2022-31
- FAO, 2022: FAO Regional Conference for Africa, Thirty-second Session, Malabo, Equatorial Guinea, 11-14 April 2022, Priorities for FAO in the Region under the FAO Strategic Framework 2022-31
- IFAD, 2019: IFAD Knowledge Management Strategy, Executive Board -126th Session, Rome, 2-3 May 2019
- IFAD, 2021: Republic of Sudan, COSOP completion review2013-2020
- HCNER ,2013: Higher Council for Environment and Natural Resources: Technology Needs Assessment for Climate Change Adaptation (TNA, 2013)
- UNEP, 2020, Adapt for Environment and Climate Resilience In Sudan (Adapt!) Integrated Water Resources Management Good Practices In Sudan- Prepared By Kamaleldin Elsiddig Bashar October 2019 Khartoum, Sudan
- Wasila et al ,2022: a report titled “Innovative and Good Practices and Monitoring and Knowledge Management Platforms Replication and Scale Up in National GGW Area submitted with the context of UNEP/GEF Project « Harnessing the Great Green Wall Initiative (GGWI) for a Sustainable and Resilient Sahel»
- WBG, 2021: Sudan Country Engagement Note for the Period FY21-FY22 (English). Washington, D.C: World Bank:Group.ttp://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/879871602253859419/Sudan-Country-Engagement-Note-for-the-Period-FY21-FY22
This paper mainly aims to capture and assess
projects and initiatives that have led or are leading
innovative actions or good practices that can be
replicated or scaled up in Sudan. Methods used mainly
desk review, interviews using convenient sampling
method with a number of experts charged of different
occupation in academia, research centres, line ministries
and freelance experts. Assessment was covered selected
projects of innovative actions and good ecological and
/or socioeconomic practices implemented by
development partners. Focusing was on four crosscutting
accelerators: which is technology, innovation, data, and
complements (governance, human capital and
institutions). The secondary and primary data collected
were subjected to screening, sorting out and thematic
analysis.
Main findings of good practices adopted include;
ecosystems-based adaptation (EbA) to reduce
vulnerability and build resilience to climate change,
adaptive technology like zero tillage, improve crop
management practices etc., promotion of inclusive high-
potential value chains, that allow resilient models for
smallholder producers and other herewith described
good practices. It is recommended that the local
authorized and concerned partners to; support and scale
up and replicate action needed to form consultative
natural resource forum develops innovative tools for
EbA, to alleviate vulnerability and build resilience to
climate change; monitoring, reporting, and verification
(MRV) system in sectors; establish Regional
Observatory Centre; adoption of social protection
system; land governance, support tenure rights and land
ownership, The technologies judged as most appropriate
by producers to be incorporated into on-farm
demonstrations and strengthening the research and to be
linked to development.
Keywords :
Innovative Actions, Good Practices, Accelerators, Scale Up, Replication.