Authors :
Stanley Ogoun; Tokoni Stephen Ogoriba
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 8 - August
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/a3z9unfc
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26aug1272
Note : A published paper may take 4-5
working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and
ResearchGate.
Abstract :
No doubt the evolving incursion of cloud-based accounting systems and real-time financial reporting (RTFR) has
significantly altered the technological and organizational foundations of accounting practice. While, the extant research has
largely framed these developments in terms of efficiency gains, cost reductions, and enhanced accessibility, such perspectives
remain limited in their ability to explain the deeper institutional and epistemological transformations currently underway.
This paper advances a theoretically grounded reconceptualization by positioning cloud accounting and RTFR as
interdependent forces driving a fundamental reorientation of accounting systems, professional roles, and the temporal logic
of financial reporting. This study was conducted via an integrative and critical review of interdisciplinary literature spanning
accounting, information systems, and organizational theory. The outcome demonstrates that cloud accounting reconfigures
the infrastructure of accounting by redistributing control, embedding governance within digital platforms, and altering
organizational dependencies on technology providers. While RTFR transforms financial reporting from a periodic,
verification-based process into a continuous, interpretive, and temporally fluid system of representation. The study argues
that these transformations jointly shift the epistemic foundations of accounting from static representations of past economic
events toward dynamic, continuously evolving constructs requiring ongoing interpretation. This shift elevates the
importance of professional judgment, interpretive expertise, and ethical oversight while simultaneously introducing new
challenges related to information overload, governance, and digital trust. The paper contributes to the literature by
encouraging the adoption of continuous auditing frameworks and standards for system-based trust verification and supports
accountants in acquiring skills to interpret continuously generated financial information while maintaining professional
integrity.
Keywords :
Accounting Epistemology, Digital Governance, Professional Reconfiguration, Accounting Infrastructure Transformation, Institutional Reorientation.
References :
- Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. University of Chicago Press.
- Alles, M. G., Brennan, G., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2006). Continuous monitoring of business process controls: A pilot implementation of a continuous auditing system at Siemens. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 7(2), 137-161.
- Alles, M. G., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2018). Putting continuous auditing theory into practice: Lessons from two pilot implementations. Journal of Information Systems, 32(1), 67-86.
- Appelbaum, D., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017). Big data and analytics in the modern audit engagement: Research needs. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(4), 1-27.
- Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A. D., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., Lee, G., Patterson, D. A., Rabkin, A., Stoica, I., & Zaharia, M. (2010). A view of cloud computing. Communications of the ACM, 53(4), 50-58. [scispace.com]
- Arnold, V., & Sutton, S. G. (2018). The changing role of accounting in the digital age. Accounting Horizons, 32(3), 1-10.
- Bhimani, A., & Willcocks, L. P. (2014). Digitisation, big data and the transformation of accounting information. Accounting and Business Research, 44(4), 469-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2014.910051 [researchon....lse.ac.uk]
- Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton.
- Bushman, R. M., Piotroski, J. D., & Smith, A. J. (2004). What determines corporate transparency? Journal of Accounting Research, 42(2), 207-252.
- Bushman, R. M., & Smith, A. J. (2001). Financial accounting information and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1-3), 237-333.
- Chan, D. Y., Chiu, V., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2018). Continuous auditing: Theory and application. Emerald Publishing.
- Dai, J., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017). Toward blockchain-based accounting and assurance. Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 5-21.
- Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., & Schrand, C. M. (2010). Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 344-401.
- DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
- Dimitriu, O., & Matei, M. (2015). Cloud accounting: A new business model in a challenging context. Procedia Economics and Finance, 32, 665-671.
- Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254-280.
- Gigler, F., Kanodia, C., Sapra, H., & Venugopalan, R. (2014). How frequent financial reporting causes managerial short-termism: An analysis of the costs and benefits of increased reporting frequency. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(2), 357-387.
- Granlund, M. (2011). Extending AIS research to management accounting and control issues: A research note. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 12(1), 3-19.
- Granlund, M., & Malmi, T. (2002). Moderate impact of ERPs on management accounting: A lag or permanent outcome? Management Accounting Research, 13(3), 299-321.
- Hunton, J. E., Wright, A. M., & Wright, S. (2003). The supply and demand for continuous reporting. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 1(1), 1-18.
- Islam, M. S., Merlo, C., & Hyland, P. (2015). Cloud computing and accounting systems: Emerging issues and future directions. International Journal of Information Management, 35(5), 1-9.
- Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1), 18-26.
- Kokina, J., & Davenport, T. H. (2017). The emergence of artificial intelligence: How automation is changing auditing. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 14(1), 115-122.
- Krahel, J. P., & Titera, W. R. (2015). Consequences of big data and formalization on accounting and auditing standards. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), 409-422.
- Lombardi, D. R., Bloch, R., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2014). The future of audit. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 11(1), 21-32.
- Marston, S., Li, Z., Bandyopadhyay, S., Zhang, J., & Ghalsasi, A. (2011). Cloud computing: The business perspective. Decision Support Systems, 51(1), 176-189. [scirp.org]
- Moll, J., & Yigitbasioglu, O. (2019). The role of internet-related technologies in shaping the work of accountants: New directions for accounting research. The British Accounting Review, 51(6), 100833. [eprints.qut.edu.au]
- Moffitt, K. C., Rozario, A. M., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2018). Robotic process automation for auditing. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 15(1), 1-10.
- Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435-1448.
- Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433-474.
- Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2002). It's about time: Temporal structuring in organizations. Organization Science, 13(6), 684-700.
- Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you. W. W. Norton.
- Quattrone, P. (2016). Management accounting goes digital: Will the move make it wiser? Management Accounting Research, 31, 118-122.
- Richins, G., Stapleton, A., Stratopoulos, T. C., & Wong, C. (2017). Big data analytics: Opportunity or threat for the accounting profession? Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 63-79.
- Romney, M. B., & Steinbart, P. J. (2018). Accounting information systems (14th ed.). Pearson.
- Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
- Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.
- Teeter, R. A., Alles, M. G., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2010). The remote audit. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 7(1), 73-88.
- Tiwana, A. (2014). Platform ecosystems: Aligning architecture, governance, and strategy. Morgan Kaufmann.
- Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356-367.
- Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting. Human Relations, 4(1), 3-38.
- Vasarhelyi, M. A., Alles, M. G., & Kogan, A. (2004). Principles of analytic monitoring for continuous assurance. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 1(1), 1-21.
- Vasarhelyi, M. A., Alles, M. G., & Williams, K. T. (2010). Continuous assurance for the now economy. Journal of Information Systems, 24(2), 91-102.
- Vasarhelyi, M. A., Kogan, A., & Tuttle, B. M. (2015). Big data in accounting: An overview. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), 381-396.
- Warren, J. D., Moffitt, K. C., & Byrnes, P. (2015). How big data will change accounting. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), 397-407.
- Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications.
- Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546-553.
No doubt the evolving incursion of cloud-based accounting systems and real-time financial reporting (RTFR) has
significantly altered the technological and organizational foundations of accounting practice. While, the extant research has
largely framed these developments in terms of efficiency gains, cost reductions, and enhanced accessibility, such perspectives
remain limited in their ability to explain the deeper institutional and epistemological transformations currently underway.
This paper advances a theoretically grounded reconceptualization by positioning cloud accounting and RTFR as
interdependent forces driving a fundamental reorientation of accounting systems, professional roles, and the temporal logic
of financial reporting. This study was conducted via an integrative and critical review of interdisciplinary literature spanning
accounting, information systems, and organizational theory. The outcome demonstrates that cloud accounting reconfigures
the infrastructure of accounting by redistributing control, embedding governance within digital platforms, and altering
organizational dependencies on technology providers. While RTFR transforms financial reporting from a periodic,
verification-based process into a continuous, interpretive, and temporally fluid system of representation. The study argues
that these transformations jointly shift the epistemic foundations of accounting from static representations of past economic
events toward dynamic, continuously evolving constructs requiring ongoing interpretation. This shift elevates the
importance of professional judgment, interpretive expertise, and ethical oversight while simultaneously introducing new
challenges related to information overload, governance, and digital trust. The paper contributes to the literature by
encouraging the adoption of continuous auditing frameworks and standards for system-based trust verification and supports
accountants in acquiring skills to interpret continuously generated financial information while maintaining professional
integrity.
Keywords :
Accounting Epistemology, Digital Governance, Professional Reconfiguration, Accounting Infrastructure Transformation, Institutional Reorientation.