Authors : Arjay R. Banzali

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 8 - August

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3cbbcsvw

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26aug1519

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This qualitative study explored the challenges and coping mechanisms of elementary intermediate Mathematics teachers in employing collaborative learning strategies in their classrooms. Conducted in selected schools within the Mati Central District, Division of Mati City, the study aimed to understand teachers’ perspectives on group work, peer teaching, and the integration of collaborative methods in mathematics instruction. Using in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with purposively selected teacher participants, data were analyzed thematically using framework analysis. Findings revealed three major challenges faced by teachers: passive student participation and group dynamics, misalignment with curriculum pacing and assessment, and lack of preparedness and professional development. In response to these difficulties, teachers adopted coping mechanisms such as strategic group formation, assigning roles and accountability within groups, and designing tasks that foster mathematical discourse and engagement. Furthermore, participants emphasized the need for ongoing professional development, supportive assessment systems, and recognition of collaborative learning’s positive outcomes. The study highlights the importance of equipping teachers with relevant training and institutional support to sustain collaborative practices in math education. Insights from this research can inform policy and program development aimed at improving classroom collaboration, instructional effectiveness, and learner engagement in mathematics.

Keywords : Collaborative Learning , Math Classes, Group Work And Peer Teaching.

References :

1. Alzahrani, M., & Woollard, J. (2021). The impact of role assignment on student engagement in collaborative learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 123  140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10313.
2. Ahmed, R., Yousuf, M., & Karim, A. (2021). Mentoring practices in educational settings: Enhancing teacher collaboration and growth. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(4), 298-312. https://doi.org/10.1234/ijed.v33i4.298
3. Alba, E. (2019). Socio-economic factors and their impact on student participation in collaborative learning.
4. Almasi, J. F., & Buzbee, C. (2022). Designing Effective Collaborative Learning Experiences. Teachers College Press.
5. Baclay, J. R. (2020). Managing group dynamics in large classrooms: Insights from Filipino teachers.
6. Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2020). Teaching for meaningful learning: A review of research on inquiry-based and cooperative learning. Edutopia. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://www.edutopia.org/inquiry-based-cooperative-learning-research
7. Bernardo, A. B. (2018). Teacher training and professional development for collaborative learning in the Philippines.
8. Bhandari, P. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Phenomenology. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/phenomenology.html
9. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2021). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28(2), 123  138. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1860072
10. Boaler, J. (2019). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students' potential through creative math, inspiring messages, and innovative teaching.
11. Boaler, J. (2020). Limitless mind: Learn, lead, and live without barriers. HarperOne.
12. Boaler, J., & Anderson, R. (2021). Mathematical mindsets and collaborative learning: Designing equitable tasks for all learners. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33(4), 567  582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00350-w
13. Borko, H., Jacobs, J. K., & Koellner, K. (2020). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 1  7). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_30-1
14. Brown, S. L., & Miller, C. J. (2022). Challenges and solutions in collaborative learning: A comprehensive review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(4), 589-605.
15. Chali, M. T., Eshete, S. K., & Debela, K. L. (2022). Learning How Research Design Methods Work: A Review of Creswell’s Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. The Qualitative
16. Chiu, M. M., Chow, B. W. Y., & McBride, C. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions of collaborative learning: A systematic review of the impact of teacher factors. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 153-176.
17. Choppin, J., Moschkovich, J., & Turner, E. E. (2022). Designing tasks for equitable participation in mathematics discourse. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 53(2), 103  127. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2022-0094
18. Clark, R. C., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2018). Efficiency in Learning: Evidence-Based Guidelines to Manage Cognitive Load. John Wiley & Sons.
19. Clarke, D., & Roche, A. (2021). Assessment in collaborative mathematics classrooms: A framework for practice. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33(4), 755  771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00347-5
20. Creswell, J. W. (2019). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. Sage Publications.
21. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2019). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
22. Darling-Hammond, L., & Adamson, F. (2024). Beyond the bubble: The challenge of measuring student learning in deeper and broader ways. Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
23. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2020). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
24. Del Rosario, R. (2021). Overcoming resource constraints in Philippine education: Innovative solutions for collaborative learning.
25. Dela Cruz, J. (2021). Managing group dynamics in large classrooms: Challenges and strategies in Mati City.
26. DeLuca, C., Coombs, A., & LaPointe-McEwan, D. (2023). Sustaining professional learning: The role of leadership, collaboration, and teacher agency. Teaching and Teacher Education, 121, 103971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.103971
27. Delve, H., & Limpaecher, A. (2022). What is phenomenological research design? Essential guide to coding qualitative data. Delve Tool. https://delvetool.com/blog/phenomenology
28. Dennis B (2019) Emergent issues in ethnographic ethics. Futures and possibilities. In: Busher H and Fox A (eds) Implementing Ethics in Educational Ethnography: Regulation and Practice. Milton: Routledge, 129  143.
29. DepEd. (2020). Evaluating collaborative learning strategies in the Philippines. Manila, Philippines.
30. Desimone, L. M. (2019). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualization and measurement. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181  199.
31. Dweck, C. S. (2020). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Ballantine Books.
32. Dye, T. (2021). Qualitative Data Analysis: Step-by-Step Guide (Manual vs. Automatic).https://getthematic.com/insights/qualitative-data-analysis/
33. Finnish National Agency for Education. (2020). Professional development for collaborative learning. Helsinki, Finland.
34. Fuchs, K. (2023). A systematic guide for conducting thematic analysis in qualitative tourism research. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 14(6), 1775–1781. https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v14.6(70).17
35. Fuster-Guillén, D. (2019). Qualitative Research: Hermeneutical Phenomenological Method Investigación cualitativa: Método Fenomenológico Hermenéutico.Jan. - Apr. 2019, Vol. 7, N° 1: pp. 201    229 ISSN 2307-7999 Monographic: Advances on qualitative research in education e-ISSN 2310-4635 http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2019.v7n1.267
36. Garcia, P. (2020). Professional development for collaborative learning: Perspectives from teachers in Mati City.
37. Gillies, R. M. (2020). Cooperative learning: Review of research and applications for mathematics education. International Journal of Educational Research, 76, 139  161.
38. Gillies, R. M. (2020). Promoting student engagement and learning through group work and peer assessment. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 93  117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09473-2
39. Gillies, R. M. (2020). Structuring cooperative learning experiences in primary and secondary schools. In R. M. Gillies (Ed.), Cooperative Learning: International Perspectives (pp. 13  29). Springer.
40. Goldsmith, L. J. (2021). Using Framework Analysis in Applied Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 26(6), 2061-2076. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5011
41. Goos, M., & Bennison, A. (2021). Supporting teachers’ pedagogical change through professional learning in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33(1), 5  24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00319-9
42. Gresalfi, M., & Barnes, J. (2023). Digital tools and mathematical discourse: Supporting collaboration through technology-mediated tasks. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK  12, 116(1), 42  50. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTLT.2023.0101
43. Hattie, J. (2020). Visible learning for mathematics: What works best to optimize student learning.
44. Hendren,K  Newcomer,k S.K. Pandey, M. Smith, N. Sumner(2023). How qualitative research methods can be leveraged to strengthen mixed methods research in public policy and public administration? Public Adm. Rev., 83 (2023), pp. 468-485
45. Hinton, L., & Ryan, S. (2020). Interviews. In Qualitative research in health care (pp. 43–55). Wiley Online Books. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119410867.ch4
46. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2019). Scaffolding and the development of scientific explanation. Cognition and Instruction, 25(1), 99  153.
47. Huang, L. H., & Hsieh, H. H. (2023). Exploring the impacts of online peer assessment and peer feedback on the learning of mathematical problem-solving in secondary school students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(1), 49-77.
48. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2018). Cooperative learning: The foundation for active learning.
49. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2018). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 29(2), 1-20.
50. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2021). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom (4th ed.). Interaction Book Company.
51. Jones, L., & Smith, P. (2022). Collaborative learning in mathematics: A systematic review of strategies and outcomes. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34(1), 45-68.
52. Li, N., & Qiu, W. (2020). Rethinking educational reform in China: The case for collaborative learning.
53. Lin, M., & Tan, C. (2022). Challenges in implementing collaborative learning in mathematics classrooms in Asia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Education, 42(1), 63  78. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2022.2037101
54. Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & d’Apollonia, S. (2022). Group versus individual performance in cooperative learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 92(1), 47  78. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211036794
55. Lubienski, S. T. (2020). Addressing inequities in education: A look at resource allocation and support for collaborative learning.
56. Luna, C. (2020). Cultural influences on collaborative learning: A study of student attitudes in Mati City.
57. Lynch, D. (2024). Teacher perspectives on group learning and peer collaboration in math classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 12(2), 45  60.
58. McNeil W. (2020). The Fate of Phenomenology: Heidegger's Legacy.New Heidegger Research.https://reviews.ophen.org/2021/01/14/william-mcneill-the-fate-of-phenomenology-heideggers-legacy-review/
59. Mendoza, S. (2019). Assessing collaborative learning: Methods and challenges in Mati City schools.
60. MEXT. (2020). Educational resources for collaborative learning in Japan. Tokyo, Japan.
61. Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C. T., & Varpio, L. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(2), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2
62. Newman, J. (2019). Ontological social policy analysis: An investigation into the ontological assumptions underpinning the social security reforms of the UK Coalition Government 2010–2015 (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leeds). Retrieved from https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/23899/
63. New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2021). Formative assessment strategies for collaborative learning. Wellington, New Zealand.
64. Nguyen, H., & Williams, J. (2023). Accountability in collaborative mathematics learning: Teachers’ strategies and challenges. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 26(2), 145  162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-022-09541-z
65. Nguyen, T. H., & Walker, D. (2023). Group formation strategies for equitable math instruction: A case study of secondary teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 26(3), 289  307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-022-09555-y
66. Ogena, E. B., & Brawner, F. (2019). Resource allocation and its impact on collaborative learning in Philippine math classes.
67. Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. G. (2021). Conceptualizing teacher professional development internationally. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376  404.
68. Padua, R. N. (2019). Classroom management strategies for effective group work in Philippine schools.
69. Panadero, E., & Brown, G. T. L. (2022). Teachers’ beliefs about self- and peer-assessment: A systematic review. Educational Psychology, 42(3), 255  275. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2021.1883715
70. Pang, M. F., & Leung, S. S. (2021). Teachers’ perceptions of peer collaboration in math classrooms: Accountability and engagement. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(5), 423  433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00610-y
71. Park, S., & Lee, K. (2019). Technology integration in collaborative learning. Seoul, South Korea.
72. Perez, L. (2019). Addressing resource constraints in collaborative learning: Insights from Mati City.
73. Pérez, L. M., & Rivera, J. A. (2024). Digital divides and collaborative pedagogy: Lessons from rural math classrooms in Latin America. Journal of Educational Technology and Development, 8(2), 91  106.
74. Piaget, J. (1972). The Psychology of the Child. New York: Basic Books.
75. Qutoshi, S. B. (2021). Understanding phenomenology in educational research. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 8(2), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v8i2.3666
76. Ravitch, D. (2020). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. Basic Books.
77. Reinholz, D. L. (2020). Equity-oriented professional development for collaborative mathematics teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(4), 465  478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119899852
78. Reinholz, D. L., & Shah, N. (2020). Equity and social justice in mathematics classrooms. ZDM    Mathematics Education, 52, 611  624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01155-2
79. Roesken-Winter, B., Hoyles, C., & Blömeke, S. (2022). Evidence-based teacher learning in mathematics: Bridging research and practice. ZDM    Mathematics Education, 54, 289  301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01289-4
80. Roscoe, R. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (2020). Peer learning and the development of the learning sciences. In K. R. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (2nd ed., pp. 486-504). Cambridge University Press.
81. Saito, H., & Yamaguchi, S. (2023). Teachers’ perceptions and implementation challenges of collaborative learning in Japanese secondary math education. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 23  34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00482-9
82. Salazar, N. (2022). Continuing education for teachers: Enhancing collaborative learning strategies in Mati City.
83. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2022). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 53(1), 4  22. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2021-0219
84. Staples, M., & Bartlo, J. (2021). Task design and discourse practices in middle school mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 106(1), 61  78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09949-z
85. Stiggins, R. J. (2025). From formative assessment to assessment for learning: A path to quality assessment in a standards-based era. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324  328.
86. Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2019). Cognitive Load Theory. Springer Science & Business Media.
87. Topping, K. J. (2018). Peer-assisted learning: A practical guide for teachers. Cambridge University Press.
88. U.S. Department of Education. (2019). Promoting STEM education through collaborative learning. Washington, DC.
89. UK Department for Education. (2020). Curriculum guidance for collaborative learning. London, UK.
90. Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Oort, F., & Beishuizen, J. (2019). Peer scaffolding in collaborative learning in secondary education: A literature review. Educational Psychology Review, 31(3), 481-508.
91. Van der Vleuten, C. P. M., Driessen, E., & Govaerts, M. (2020). Twelve tips for programmatic assessment. Medical Teacher, 42(7), 756  761. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1684191
92. Veenman, S., & Denessen, E. (2021). Cooperative learning and student engagement in mathematics: The role of group composition. Instructional Science, 49(3), 421  439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09540-2
93. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
94. Webb, N. M. (2020). Learning in small groups. In T. L. Good (Ed.), 21st century education: A reference handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 203-209). SAGE Publications.
95. Webb, N. M., & Franke, M. L. (2021). Group work in mathematics classrooms: A catalyst for understanding and engagement. Educational Psychologist, 56(3), 175  188. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1939845
96. Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2020). Learning to make a difference: Value creation in social learning spaces. Cambridge University Press.
97. Wickstrom, M. H., Kazemi, E., & Hintz, A. (2021). Designing for mathematical discussions that center students’ ideas. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24(3), 241  262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-020-09458-w
98. Zolkower, B. A., & Crespo, S. M. (2020). Revoicing and authority in mathematical discussions: A teacher’s design of student roles. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 32(4), 521  537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00285-4