⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Commercial vs Local Yoghurt: A Study on Quality and Safety


Authors : Adithyan R.; Athira Anilkumar; Kalyani Vijayan; Krishnapriya K. Nair; Devika Lal; Dr. Jubi Jacob

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 5 - May


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/42p9a84c

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/5ysbh6c6

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26May041

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Yogurt is a nutrient-rich probiotic dairy product produced by fermenting milk with Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus [8]. This study compared the microbiological safety and physicochemical properties of commercial yogurt (Sample A) and locally produced yogurt (Sample B) over four weeks. Sample A maintained acceptable microbial quality, with no detectable coliforms or Escherichia coli, indicating proper hygiene and processing. In contrast, Sample B showed higher microbial loads, including coliforms and E. coli, suggesting inadequate sanitation. Proximate analysis revealed that Sample A had stable composition, with protein (7.5–7.6%), fat (~2.14%), and ash (0.90– 0.98%). Sample B showed lower protein (6.6–6.7%), higher fat (~3.0%), and lower ash (0.71–0.78%). Carbohydrate content decreased in both samples due to fermentation, more significantly in Sample B. Moisture increased and solids-not-fat decreased during storage, especially in Sample B, indicating instability. Sample A showed controlled fermentation, with pH decreasing slightly (4.32–4.25) and acidity rising marginally (1.11–1.15%). Sample B exhibited greater changes (pH 4.10– 3.60; acidity 1.70–3.17%), reflecting uncontrolled fermentation. Structural analysis showed better gel quality in Sample A, with lower syneresis (10.76%) and higher water-holding capacity (78.5%). Overall, commercial yogurt demonstrated superior safety and quality.

Keywords : Yogurt; Commercial Yogurt; Probiotic; Microbial Quality; Escherichia Coli; Proximate Composition; Syneresis; Titratable Acidity; Water-Holding Capacity.

References :

  1. AOAC International. Official methods of analysis. 22nd ed. Rockville (MD): AOAC International; 2023.
  2. Banerjee M and Sarkar PK (2003). Microbiological quality of some retail spices in India. Food Research International, 36(5): 469-474.
  3. Caballero, B. (2003). Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition. Academic Press, London, UK.
  4. Cais-Sokolinska, D., Pikul, J. (2001). The effect of refrigeration ´ storage temperatures on the quality and durability of natural yoghurt ´ 8–9, 84–88 [in Polish].
  5. Coppuccino, J. G. and N. Sherman (1996). Microbiology a Laboratory Manual. The Benjamin/Cummings Pub. Co. Inc. New York, USA.
  6. Crank, J. (1975). The Mathematics of Diffusion (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  7. Dairy Microbiology Handbook: Richard K. Robinson, 3rd edition - 2002–2005 range, Publisher: Wiley-Interscience (John Wiley & Sons).
  8. Dairy Science and Technology — Walstra, P., Wouters, J.T.M., & Geurts, T.J. (2006). Dairy Science and Technology, 2nd ed., CRC Press.
  9. David R. Peryam and Francis J. Pilgrim (1957). Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences. Food Technology, 11(9), 9–14.
  10. Donmez, O., Mogol, B. A., & Gokmen, V. (2017). Syneresis and rheological properties of yoghurt: Effect of processing conditions.
  11. Estrada, J.D. et al., 2011. Syneresis in fermented dairy products.
  12. Harrigan, W. F. and M. E. McCance (1976). Laboratory Methods in Food and Dairy Microbiology. Academic Press, London, UK
  13. Izadi, Z. et al., 2015. Studies on gel stability and whey separation in yoghurt.
  14. Journal of Dairy Science Volume 100, Issue 2, February 2017, Pages 901-907 Syneresis and rheological behaviors of set yogurt containing green tea and green coffee powders Author links open overlay panelÖzge Dönmez, Burçe Ataç Mogol, Vural Gökmen
  15. Lim, K. S., Huh, C. S., Baek, Y. J., & Kim, H. U. (1995). Aselective enumeration medium for bifidobacteria in fermented dairy products. Journal of Dairy Science, 78(10), 2108–2112.
  16. Lopez., M, C, L, M, Medina, M,G,Cordoba and R.Jordano, 1997., Evaluvation of the microbiological quality of yoghurt ice-cream. ALIMENTARIA. 35:39-45 CAB Abst (1996-1998/07).
  17. Lucrări ştiințifice Zootehnie şi Biotehnologii, vol, 41 (1) (2008), Timişoara COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MILK CASEIN ASSAY METHODS.
  18. Marth E H (1978): “Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products”. 14th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C
  19. Mojka, K. (2013). Charakterystyka mlecznych napojów fermentowanych. Characteristics of fermented milk drinks. Probl. Hig. Epidemiol., 94(4), 722–729 [in Polish].
  20. Naeem K and Rizvi A-u-R (1986). Studies on the physical and bacterial quality of dahi with special reference to public health. The Journal of Pakistan Medical Association, 36(4): 87-9.
  21. P. F., & McSweeney, P. L. H. (1998). Dairy Chemistry and Biochemistry. Springer, Boston, MA.
  22. P. F., & McSweeney, P. L. H. (2003). Fundamentals of Dairy Chemistry (3rd ed.). Springer.
  23. Peryam, D. R., & Pilgrim, F. J. (1957). Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences. Food Technology, 11, 9–14.
  24. Pluta, A., Kazimierczak, A. and Wąsowska ,D. 1999. “Wpływ wybranych hydrokoloidów na jakość jogurtu”. In [Influence of selected hydrocolloids on quality of yoghurt]. Przemysł Spożywczy [Food Industry] Vol. 3, 41 – 43. [In Polish]
  25. Robinson, R. K. (Ed.). (2002). Dairy Microbiology Handbook: The Microbiology of Milk and Milk Products (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  26. Tamime, A. Y., Robinson, R. K., & others (2007). Yoghurt: Science and Technology (3rd ed.). Woodhead Publishing.
  27. Walstra, P., Wouters, J. T. M., & Geurts, T. J. (2006). Dairy Science and Technology (2nd ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA.
  28. Wojtczak, A., Ziarno, M., Czarniak, K. (2018). The influence of technological factors on the survivability Lb. acidophilus and Lb. casei. Przem. Spoz., 72(8), 42–45 [in Polish].
  29. www.pyiephyomaung.yolasite.com.
  30. https://www.britannica.com.Encyclopaedia Britannica. (2026). Yogurt: Definition, production, and uses. Retrieved from
  31. Zaręba, D., & Ziarno, M. (2013).The role of probiotic bacteria in yoghurt production and their impact on quality and health benefits. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Technologia Alimentaria, 12(3), 279–289.

Yogurt is a nutrient-rich probiotic dairy product produced by fermenting milk with Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus [8]. This study compared the microbiological safety and physicochemical properties of commercial yogurt (Sample A) and locally produced yogurt (Sample B) over four weeks. Sample A maintained acceptable microbial quality, with no detectable coliforms or Escherichia coli, indicating proper hygiene and processing. In contrast, Sample B showed higher microbial loads, including coliforms and E. coli, suggesting inadequate sanitation. Proximate analysis revealed that Sample A had stable composition, with protein (7.5–7.6%), fat (~2.14%), and ash (0.90– 0.98%). Sample B showed lower protein (6.6–6.7%), higher fat (~3.0%), and lower ash (0.71–0.78%). Carbohydrate content decreased in both samples due to fermentation, more significantly in Sample B. Moisture increased and solids-not-fat decreased during storage, especially in Sample B, indicating instability. Sample A showed controlled fermentation, with pH decreasing slightly (4.32–4.25) and acidity rising marginally (1.11–1.15%). Sample B exhibited greater changes (pH 4.10– 3.60; acidity 1.70–3.17%), reflecting uncontrolled fermentation. Structural analysis showed better gel quality in Sample A, with lower syneresis (10.76%) and higher water-holding capacity (78.5%). Overall, commercial yogurt demonstrated superior safety and quality.

Keywords : Yogurt; Commercial Yogurt; Probiotic; Microbial Quality; Escherichia Coli; Proximate Composition; Syneresis; Titratable Acidity; Water-Holding Capacity.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - May - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe