Authors :
Tejaswini Bhure; Pratibha Chokhi; Chittranjan Yadav
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 3 - March
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/yj4thrh2
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/mphbfz2c
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25mar1862
Google Scholar
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.
Abstract :
Background:
Hospitalized patients often hold various beliefs about food and nutrition, some of which may be inaccurate or even
harmful to their health. These food myths can stem from cultural traditions, personal experiences, or misinformation spread
through various channels. Common examples include the belief that certain foods can cure diseases, that dietary restrictions
are unnecessary, or that supplements can replace a balanced diet. Such misconceptions can negatively impact a patient's
adherence to prescribed dietary plans, potentially hindering their recovery and overall health outcomes. Effective dietary
counseling plays a crucial role in addressing these myths, providing evidence-based information, and empowering patients
to make informed food choices. Studies have shown that dietary counseling can lead to improved adherence, better
understanding of nutritional needs, and ultimately, better health outcomes for hospitalized patients.
Aims & Objectives:
This study investigates prevalent food myths among hospitalized patients and aims to dispel these misconceptions
through evidence-based nutrition education, empowering patients to make informed dietary choices for improved health
outcomes.
Method:
50 hospitalized patients, both male and female aged 20 to 70, were randomly selected from a single hospital in Nagpur,
Maharashtra. All participants provided written informed consent before enrolling in the study. Data was collected using
non-invasive methods, including questionnaires and personal interviews. Participants also received nutrition education
aimed at dispelling common food myths, and this education was documented.
Results:
50 hospitalized patients were studied, with the most common chief complaints being post-cesarean section (8%) and
uncontrolled diabetes (4%). Other conditions included anemia, COPD, hypertension, fractures, and cancers. The most
frequently prescribed diet was a normal diet (38%), while specialized diets like modified diabetic high protein, DASH, and
renal diets were each prescribed to only 2% of patients. A common food myth was the avoidance of sour and cold foods
(48%), followed by beliefs about "hot-natured" foods (26%), yellow-colored foods (10%), and rice (10%). Hearsay was the
primary source of these myths (84%), with social media contributing less (16%). Eliminating these foods showed no health
benefits. Dietary counseling had varying acceptance rates: complete acceptance (44%), partial acceptance (22%), and non-
acceptance (34%). This highlights the need for better communication and education to improve adherence to dietary plans.
Conclusion:
Dietary counselling saw varying levels of acceptance among participants. While 44% fully embraced the
recommendations, a substantial 34% did not accept them, and 22% showed partial acceptance. Interestingly, neither gender
nor age significantly influenced acceptance rates, suggesting that other, yet unidentified, factors are more likely
determinants of adherence to dietary advice.
Keywords :
Food Myths, Food Faddism, Dietary Counseling, Hearsay, Hot Natured Food, Taaseer, Social Media.
References :
- Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M., & Yu, C. (2019). Trends in news consumption since 2016. Science, 366(6473), 1469-1473.
- Coulston, A. M., Boushey, C. J., & Ferruzzi, M. G. (2013). Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: use of nutritive and nonnutritive sweeteners. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 113(10), 1339-1354.
- Drewnowski, A., & Darmon, N. (2005). Food choices and diet costs: an economic analysis. The Journal of nutrition, 135(4), 900-904.
- Franz, M. J., Bantle, J. P., Beebe, C. A., Brunzell, J. D., Chiasson, J. L., Garg, A., ... & Wheeler, M. (2002). Evidence-based nutrition principles and recommendations for the treatment and prevention of diabetes and related complications. Diabetes care, 25(1), 148-198.
- Glasgow, R. E., Strycker, L. A., Eakin, E. G., Toobert, D. J., & Smith, K. S. (2000). Moving beyond the intensive intervention: evaluating the sustainability of self-management support following a diabetes self-management trial. Annals of behavioral medicine, 22(1), 69-74. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6722626/ https://www.lifespringhomenutrition.com/debunking-common-nutrition-myths-and-misinformation/
- Khanna, S., & Puri, S. (2011). Food beliefs and practices among North Indian women. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 36(4), 297–301.
- Lesser, L. I., Mazza, M. C., & Lucan, S. C. (2015). Nutrition myths and healthy dietary advice in clinical practice. American family physician, 91(9), 634-638.
- Mayo Clinic. (2023). Nutrition and healthy eating. https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/basics/healthy-diets/hlv-20049477
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. (n.d.). Nutrition for hospitalized patients.
- Ogden, J. (2017). Health psychology: A textbook. McGraw-Hill education.
- Ramaswamy, T., DeWane, M. P., Dashti, H. S., Lau, M., Wischmeyer, P. E., Nagrebetsky, A., & Sparling, J. (2024). Nine myths about enteral feeding in critically Ill adults: an expert perspective. Advances in Nutrition, 100345.
- Satia, J. A. (2002). Dietary acculturation and nutritional epidemiology. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 102(10), 1477-1482.
- Steptoe, A., Pollard, T. M., & Wardle, J. (1995). General health lifestyles in young adults: prevalence of healthy and unhealthy behaviours. Journal of epidemiology and community health, 49(1), 16-23.
- Story, M., Kaphingst, K. M., Robinson-O'Brien, R., & Glanz, K. (2008). Creating healthy food and eating environments: policy and environmental approaches. Annual review of public health, 29, 253-272.
- Waitzberg, D. L., Correia, M. I. T. D., & Evans, D. C. (2001). Hospital malnutrition. JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 25(1), S66-S73.
- Weinberg, J. L. (2023). How should food offered by health care organizations meet individual, community, and ecological needs? AMA Journal of Ethics, 25(4), 256-263.
Background:
Hospitalized patients often hold various beliefs about food and nutrition, some of which may be inaccurate or even
harmful to their health. These food myths can stem from cultural traditions, personal experiences, or misinformation spread
through various channels. Common examples include the belief that certain foods can cure diseases, that dietary restrictions
are unnecessary, or that supplements can replace a balanced diet. Such misconceptions can negatively impact a patient's
adherence to prescribed dietary plans, potentially hindering their recovery and overall health outcomes. Effective dietary
counseling plays a crucial role in addressing these myths, providing evidence-based information, and empowering patients
to make informed food choices. Studies have shown that dietary counseling can lead to improved adherence, better
understanding of nutritional needs, and ultimately, better health outcomes for hospitalized patients.
Aims & Objectives:
This study investigates prevalent food myths among hospitalized patients and aims to dispel these misconceptions
through evidence-based nutrition education, empowering patients to make informed dietary choices for improved health
outcomes.
Method:
50 hospitalized patients, both male and female aged 20 to 70, were randomly selected from a single hospital in Nagpur,
Maharashtra. All participants provided written informed consent before enrolling in the study. Data was collected using
non-invasive methods, including questionnaires and personal interviews. Participants also received nutrition education
aimed at dispelling common food myths, and this education was documented.
Results:
50 hospitalized patients were studied, with the most common chief complaints being post-cesarean section (8%) and
uncontrolled diabetes (4%). Other conditions included anemia, COPD, hypertension, fractures, and cancers. The most
frequently prescribed diet was a normal diet (38%), while specialized diets like modified diabetic high protein, DASH, and
renal diets were each prescribed to only 2% of patients. A common food myth was the avoidance of sour and cold foods
(48%), followed by beliefs about "hot-natured" foods (26%), yellow-colored foods (10%), and rice (10%). Hearsay was the
primary source of these myths (84%), with social media contributing less (16%). Eliminating these foods showed no health
benefits. Dietary counseling had varying acceptance rates: complete acceptance (44%), partial acceptance (22%), and non-
acceptance (34%). This highlights the need for better communication and education to improve adherence to dietary plans.
Conclusion:
Dietary counselling saw varying levels of acceptance among participants. While 44% fully embraced the
recommendations, a substantial 34% did not accept them, and 22% showed partial acceptance. Interestingly, neither gender
nor age significantly influenced acceptance rates, suggesting that other, yet unidentified, factors are more likely
determinants of adherence to dietary advice.
Keywords :
Food Myths, Food Faddism, Dietary Counseling, Hearsay, Hot Natured Food, Taaseer, Social Media.