Authors : António Vilanculo

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 9 - September

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yexws8z4

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4642ur4n

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25sep1541

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : This article examines community participation in the monitoring of public policies in Panda District, taking Ubuntu philosophy as an ethical and cultural reference. The general objective is to analyze community participation in policy monitoring through the lens of Ubuntu. The central problem that motivated this study lies in the gap between legal provisions and lived reality: limited citizen presence in policy processes, perceptions of partiality, and weak trust in institutions. A mixed methodology was adopted, including questionnaires administered to officials and 50 beneficiaries, semi- structured interviews, and direct observation, which enabled the capture of perceptions, behaviors, and decision-making routines. The findings reveal a lack of knowledge of the code of ethics, disrespectful treatment of citizens, decision-making centralization, and signs of nhonguismo (favoritism based on kinship or personal ties), which together form a cycle of exclusion that undermines monitoring. The study concludes that Ubuntu offers a practical framework to restore social bonds and revitalize participation, while recognizing that such transformation requires stable institutional routines. It is therefore recommended to promote continuous dissemination of institutional ethics, to reactivate local councils as deliberative spaces, to establish accountability calendars with public feedback, and to implement pilot projects in neighborhoods that adopt dialogue circles, shared leadership, and the inclusion of women and youth, accompanied by simple metrics of trust, transparency, and satisfaction with public services.

Keywords : Community Participation; Public Policy Monitoring; Panda District; Ubuntu Philosophy.

References :

1. Amaral, D. (2021). Ética na Política: uma reflexão sobre as manifestações do exercício político em Moçambique. Revista científica chinhamapere: Ciências Sociais, Negócios e Direito, Outubro, Número 01.
2. Decree No. 11/2005 of 10 June – Regulation of the Law on Local State Organs.
3. Dju, A. O., & Muraro, D. N. (2022). Ubuntu como modo de vida: contribuição da filosofia africana para pensar a democracia. Trans/Form/Ação, 45(Especial), 239–264.
4. Filho, J. A. (2002).  Deontologia e conduta ética. Brasília: CFC.
5. Fuel, T. H. (2024). Ubuntu no Novo Serviço Público? Civitas: Revista de Ciências Sociais, 24(1), 1–11.
6. Law No. 11/2023 of 23 August – Amends the Constitution of the Republic of 2004, as previously amended by Law No. 1/2018 of 12 June.
7. Law No. 12/2024 of 18 June – Approves the Law on Public Probity and repeals Law No. 16/2012.
8. Law No. 8/2003 of 19 May – Establishes principles and rules on the organization, competences, and functioning of state organs at the levels of province, district, administrative post, and locality.
9. MASC (2010). Ética na administração pública. São Paulo: Vozes.
10. Mathonhane, A. J. (2023). Participação da sociedade civil na formulação e implementação das políticas públicas em Moçambique: oportunidades e progressos. Njinga & Sepé: Revista Internacional de Culturas, Línguas Africanas e Brasileiras, 3(2), 317–331.
11. Mbiti, J. S. (1970). African religions and philosophy. London: Heinemann.
12. Muia, D., Masese, S. M., & Rufo, B. M. (2023). Inclusive and participatory community development: Building on Ubuntu to leave no one behind. IACD Journal, (10), 1–14.
13. Ncube, L. B. (2010). Ubuntu: A transformative leadership philosophy. Journal of Leadership Studies, 4(3), 77–82.
14. Olowu, D., & Wunsch, J. S. (2004). Local governance in Africa: The challenges of democratic decentralization. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
15. Ramose, M. B. (2002). A ética do Ubuntu [The ethics of Ubuntu]. In P. H. Coetzee & A. P. J. Roux (Eds.), The African Philosophy Reader (pp. 324–330). New York: Routledge.
16. Resolution No. 15/2018 of 24 May – Approves the Code of Conduct for State Officials and Agents.
17. Rosa, J. G., Lima, L., & Aguiar, R. (2021). Políticas públicas: introdução. Rio de Janeiro: Jacarta.
18. Santos, L. S., & Serafim, M. C. (2024). Em busca de uma ética administrativa pós-convencional no contexto das organizações públicas brasileiras. Cadernos de Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 29.
19. Teles, F., & Moreira, J. M. (2007). Liderança ética num contexto de governação local: Estado, mercado e sociedade civil. Revista de Administração Local, 30(219), 345–354.