Comparative Analysis of Automated Melanoma Recognition Algorithms in Dermoscopy


Authors : Mohd Muthi ur Rahman; M. A. Majed; Dr. Syeda Gauhar Fatima

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 9 - September


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/36baj4nb

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/ynuyvm9x

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25sep1008

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : This paper presents a comparative analysis of automated melanoma recognition algorithms in dermoscopy, highlighting the strengths and limitations of various state-of-the-art techniques. The study evaluates different image processing and machine learning approaches used for early melanoma detection, focusing on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and computational efficiency. Publicly available dermoscopic image datasets were utilized to ensure consistency in performance assessment. The results emphasize the critical role of data quality, algorithmic architecture, and preprocessing techniques in determining diagnostic performance. This analysis aims to guide future research toward more robust, interpretable, and clinically viable melanoma detection systems.

Keywords : Melanoma Detection, Dermoscopy, Image Analysis, Machine Learning, Algorithm Comparison, Computer-Aided Diagnosis.

References :

  1. M. Silveira, J. C. Nascimento, J. S. Marques, A. R. Marc¸al, T. Mendonc¸a, S. Yamauchi, J. Maeda, and J. Rozeira, “Comparison of segmentation methods for melanoma diagnosis in dermoscopy images,” Selected Topics in Signal Processing, IEEE Journal of, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 35–45, 2009.
  2. N. K. Mishra and M. E. Celebi, “An overview of melanoma detection in dermoscopy images using image processing and machine learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.07843, 2016.
  3. R. J. Stanley, W. V. Stoecker, and R. H. Moss, “A relative color approach to color discrimination for malignant melanoma detection in dermoscopy images,” Skin Research and Technology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 62–72, 2007.
  4. Y. I. Cheng, R. Swamisai, S. E. Umbaugh, R. H. Moss, W. V. Stoecker,
  5. S. Teegala, and S. K. Srinivasan, “Skin lesion classification using relative color features,” Skin Research and Technology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 53–64, 2008.
  6. L. Ballerini, R. B. Fisher, B. Aldridge, and J. Rees, “A color and texture based hierarchical k-nn approach to the classification of non-melanoma skin lesions,” in Color Medical Image Analysis. Springer, 2013, pp. 63–86.
  7. Haggenmüller S., Maron R.C., Hekler A., Utikal J.S., Barata C., Barnhill R.L., Beltraminelli H., Berking C., Betz-Stablein B., Blum A., et al. Skin cancer classification via convolutional neural networks: Systematic review of studies involving human experts. Eur. J. Cancer. 2021;156:202–216. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.06.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gouabou A.C.F., Collenne J., Monnier J., Iguernaissi R., Damoiseaux J.-L., Moudafi A., Merad D. Computer Aided Diagnosis of Melanoma Using Deep Neural Networks and Game Theory: Application on Dermoscopic Images of Skin Lesions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:13838. doi: 10.3390/ijms232213838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Marchetti M.A., Codella N.C., Dusza S.W., Gutman D.A., Helba B., Kalloo A., Mishra N., Carrera C., Celebi M.E., DeFazio J.L., et al. Results of the 2016 International Skin Imaging Collaboration International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging challenge: Comparison of the accuracy of computer algorithms to dermatologists for the diagnosis of melanoma from dermoscopic images. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2018;78:270–277.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

This paper presents a comparative analysis of automated melanoma recognition algorithms in dermoscopy, highlighting the strengths and limitations of various state-of-the-art techniques. The study evaluates different image processing and machine learning approaches used for early melanoma detection, focusing on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and computational efficiency. Publicly available dermoscopic image datasets were utilized to ensure consistency in performance assessment. The results emphasize the critical role of data quality, algorithmic architecture, and preprocessing techniques in determining diagnostic performance. This analysis aims to guide future research toward more robust, interpretable, and clinically viable melanoma detection systems.

Keywords : Melanoma Detection, Dermoscopy, Image Analysis, Machine Learning, Algorithm Comparison, Computer-Aided Diagnosis.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
31 - December - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe