Comparative Analysis of Chloride Penetration in Sustainable Quaternary Blended SCC with and Without Polypropylene Fiber Reinforcement


Authors : Shalini G M; S Bhavanishankar

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 4 - April


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/ymuxkkch

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4tufsxs9

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25apr1868

Google Scholar

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.


Abstract : This study focuses on the development of an economical Self-Compacting Concrete (SCC) that maintains its characteristic ability to flow under its own weight, fully occupying formwork without the need for vibrational compaction. The research aims to reduce waste and carbon emissions associated with cement production by optimizing the use of supplementary materials. Specifically, the study explores the effects of varying concentrations of fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), the substitution of 10% of cement with silica fume, and the inclusion of 0.2% polypropylene fiber (PPF) on SCC properties. Eight concrete mixes were evaluated: four incorporating PPF and four without. The results provide insights into the performance and environmental benefits of these modified SCC formulations. Also the study investigates the chloride penetration characteristics of Sustainable Quaternary Blended Self- Compacting Concrete (QBSCC) with and without polypropylene fiber reinforcement. Various QBSCC mixes were formulated by replacing Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) with combinations of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) including silica fume (SF), fly ash (FA), and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS). The Rapid Chloride Penetration Test (RCPT) was conducted at 28 and 56 days to assess chloride ion permeability. Results indicate that QBSCC mixes incorporating SCMs exhibit significantly lower chloride permeability compared to the control mix (MIX-1) composed of 100% OPC. MIX-4, containing 50% OPC, 10% SF, 10% FA, and 30% GGBS, shows the most promising performance with the lowest passed charges, suggesting enhanced durability against chloride ion penetration. Addition of 0.2% polypropylene fibers further enhanced chloride resistance, especially in the mix with the highest resistance to chloride penetration. Overall, the study concluded that QBSCC formulations with optimized SCM content and polypropylene fiber reinforcement have superior durability and reduced chloride permeability, making them suitable for construction in aggressive environments where chloride exposure is a concern.

Keywords : SSC, QBSCC, Silica fume, Fly ash, GGBS, Polypropylene fibers, Durability Assessment, RCPT.

References :

  1. Okan Karahan, Cengiz Duran Atis (2011), “The durability properties of polypropylene fiber reinforced fly ash concrete”, Materials and Design, 1044–1049, doi:10.1016/j.matdes.20 10.07.0
  2. Ali Reza Bagheri, Hamed Zanganeh (2012), “Comparison of Rapid Tests for Evaluation of Chloride Resistance of Concretes with Supplementary Cementitious Materials” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 24, No. 9, September 1, 2012. © ASCE, ISSN 0899- 1561/2012/9-1175-1182
  3. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000485.
  4. Wongkeo, Thongsanitgarn, Ngamjarurojana, Chaipanich (2014), “Compressive strength and chloride resistance of self-compacting concrete containing high level fly ash and silica fume”, Materials and Design, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.matdes.2014.07.042
  5. Vahid Afroughsabet, Togay Ozbakkaloglu (2015), “Mechanical and durability properties of high-strength concrete containing steel and polypropylene fibers” Construction and Building Materials 94 (2015) 73–82, http://dx.doi.o rg/10.1016/j.conbuild mat .2015 .06.051
  6. N. Flores Medina, G. Barluenga, F. Hernández-Olivares (2015), “Combined effect of Polypropylene fibers and Silica Fume to improve the durability of concrete with natural Pozzolans blended cement” Construction and Building Materials 96 (2015) 556–566
  7. Sherif Yehia, Sharef Farrag, Kareem Helal, Shahinaz El-Kalie (2015), “Effects of Fly Ash, Silica Fume, and Ground Granulated Blast Slag on Properties of Self Compacting High Strength Lightweight Concrete” GSTF Journal of Engineering Technology (JET) Vol.3 No.3, October 2015 DOI: 10.5176/2251-3701_3.3.138
  8. Faiz A. Mirza1, and Ayman G, Abdel-Rhaman (2016), “Performance of Polypropylene Fiber Reinforced Self-Compacting Lightweight Concrete in Hardened State” Fourth International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies
  9. Deepankar K, Ashish, Bhupinder Singh, Surender K. Verma (2016), “The effect of attack of chloride and sulphate on ground granulated blast furnace slag concrete” Advances in Concrete Construction,Vol. 4, No. 2 (2016) http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/acc. 2016.4.2.107
  10. B. S. Dhanya, Manu Santhanam (2017), “Performance evaluation of rapid chloride permeability test in concretes with supplementary cementitious materials” Materials and Structures (2017) 50:67 DOI 10.1617/s11527-016-0940-3
  11. Qi Cao, Quanqing Gao, Rongxiong Gao, Jinqing Jia (2017), “Chloride penetration resistance and frost resistance of fiber reinforced expansive self-consolidating concrete” Construction and Building Materials 158 (2018) 719–727 https://doi.org/10 .1016/ j.conbuildmat.2017.10 .029
  12. Hawra Alradhawi (2018), “Experimental Investigation of use Polypropylene Fibers in Self-Compacting Concrete”, International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) Volume 57, Issue 1 http://www.ijettjournal.org/
  13. Ardra Mohan, K.M. Mini (2018), “Strength and durability studies of SCC incorporating silica fume and ultra fine GGBS” Construction and Building Materials 171 (2018) 919–928 https://doi.org/10.1 016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.186
  14. Susanto Teng, Vahid Afroughsabet, Claudia P. Ostertag (2018), “Flexural behavior and durability properties of high performance hybrid-fiber-reinforced concrete” Construction and Building Materials 182 (2018) 504–515 https://doi.org/10.10 16/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.158
  15. Mahima Ganeshan, Sreevidya Venkataraman (2019), “Durability and microstructural studies on fly ash blended self-compacting geopolymer concrete”, European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering,DOI:10.1080/1964818 9.2019.1615991
  16. Mr. R. Jeya Prakash, Ms. R. Nirmala (2019), “An Experimental Study on Rapid Chloride Penetration Test of Self Compacting Concrete” Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 24566470, Volume-3 | Issue-3, April 2019, pp.272-277.
  17. F. A. Mustapha, A. Sulaiman, R. N. Mohamed (2019), “The effect of fly ash and silica fume on self-compacting high-performance concrete”, Materials Today:Proceedings, https://doi.org/10. 1016/j. matpr.2020.04.493
  18. Zinnur Çelik, Ahmet Ferhat Bingo, Ayhan Soner Agsu (2021), “Fresh, mechanical, sorptivity and rapid chloride permeability properties of self compacting concrete with silica fume and fly ash” Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering https://doi.or g/10.1007/s40996-021-00676-x
  19. Karthik, K. Nirmalkumar, R. Priyadharshini (2021), “Characteristic assessment of self-compacting concrete with supplementary cementitious materials” Construction and Building Materials 297 (2021) 123845
  20. Zhanggen Guo, Jing Zhanga, Tao Jiang (2020), “Development of sustainable self-compacting concrete using recycled concrete aggregate and fly ash, slag, silica fume” European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2020.1715847
  21. V. V. Sai Chand, B. Kameswara Rao, C. Hanumantha Rao, “Investigation on chloride penetration in concrete mixes of different cement replacement percentages with fly ash and silica fume”, Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matp r.2020.06.270
  22. M. Arun Kumar, S. Balaji, et.al, “Laboratory study on mechanical properties of self compacting concrete using marble waste and polypropylene fiber”, cleaner Materials (ISSN: 2772-3976), https://doi.org/10.10 16/j. clema.2022.100156
  23. Mathews, M.E, Kiran, T, Nammalvar, Anbarasu, M, Kanagaraj, Andrushia (2023), “Evaluation of the Rheological and Durability Performance of Sustainable Self-Compacting Concrete” Sustainability 2023, 15, 4212. https://doi.org/10. 3 390/su15054212
  24. Madasu Durga Rao, Subhashish Dey, B. Panduranga Rao,“Characterization of fiber reinforced self-compacting concrete by fly ash and cement”, Chemistry of Inorganic Materials, Volume 1,ISSN2949-7469, https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.cinorg.2023.100010
  25. Abu Sayed Mohammad Akid, Saif Hossain, Md, “Assessing the influence of fly ash and polypropylene fiber on fresh, mechanical and durability properties of concrete” Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences https://doi.org/10.1016/j.j ksues.2021.06.005
  26. Daniyar Akhmetov, Sungat Akhazhanov, Ainur Jetpisbayeva,“Effect of low-modulus polypropylene fiber on physical and mechanical properties of self-compacting concrete”, Case Studies on construction materials, https://doi.o rg/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00814
  27. SK. Shehabaz, Y. Venkata Sai, Dr. K. Jayachandra (2023), “Studies on the Mechanical and Durability Properties of Multi Component Blended Concrete” International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM) http://www.ijaem.net/IS 383:2016 “Coarse and fine aggregate for concrete-specification”
  28. IS: 4031 (Part 5)-1988 (reaffirmed 2019) “Methods of physical test for hydraulic cement, Part-5 Determination of initial and final setting times”.
  29. IS: 2386 (Part III)-1963 (reaffirmed 2021) “Methods of test for aggregates for concrete, Part-III: Specific gravity, density, voids, absorption and bulking”.
  30. IS: 2386 (Part-I)-1963 (reaffirmed 2021) “Methods of test for aggregates for concrete, Part-1: Particles size and shape”.
  31. EFNARC (2005), the European Guidelines for Self-Compacting Concrete Specification, Production and Use.
  32. IS: 516 (Part 1/sec1):2021 “Hardened concrete-methods of test, Part-1: testing of strength of hardened concrete, Section-1: compressive, flexural and split tensile strength”.
  33. IS: 4031 (Part 4)-1988 (reaffirmed 2019) “Methods of physical test for hydraulic cement, Part-4 Determination of consistency of standard cement paste”.
  34. ASTM C1202 - Standard Test Method for Electrical Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration

This study focuses on the development of an economical Self-Compacting Concrete (SCC) that maintains its characteristic ability to flow under its own weight, fully occupying formwork without the need for vibrational compaction. The research aims to reduce waste and carbon emissions associated with cement production by optimizing the use of supplementary materials. Specifically, the study explores the effects of varying concentrations of fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), the substitution of 10% of cement with silica fume, and the inclusion of 0.2% polypropylene fiber (PPF) on SCC properties. Eight concrete mixes were evaluated: four incorporating PPF and four without. The results provide insights into the performance and environmental benefits of these modified SCC formulations. Also the study investigates the chloride penetration characteristics of Sustainable Quaternary Blended Self- Compacting Concrete (QBSCC) with and without polypropylene fiber reinforcement. Various QBSCC mixes were formulated by replacing Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) with combinations of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) including silica fume (SF), fly ash (FA), and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS). The Rapid Chloride Penetration Test (RCPT) was conducted at 28 and 56 days to assess chloride ion permeability. Results indicate that QBSCC mixes incorporating SCMs exhibit significantly lower chloride permeability compared to the control mix (MIX-1) composed of 100% OPC. MIX-4, containing 50% OPC, 10% SF, 10% FA, and 30% GGBS, shows the most promising performance with the lowest passed charges, suggesting enhanced durability against chloride ion penetration. Addition of 0.2% polypropylene fibers further enhanced chloride resistance, especially in the mix with the highest resistance to chloride penetration. Overall, the study concluded that QBSCC formulations with optimized SCM content and polypropylene fiber reinforcement have superior durability and reduced chloride permeability, making them suitable for construction in aggressive environments where chloride exposure is a concern.

Keywords : SSC, QBSCC, Silica fume, Fly ash, GGBS, Polypropylene fibers, Durability Assessment, RCPT.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe