⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Comparative Evaluation of Waste-Derived Activated Carbons for Co2 Removal from Natural Gas


Authors : Oghene Ufuoma Jude; Ipeghan Otaraku; Muwarure Peter; Banigo Godexalted

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 6 - June


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3xme42hc

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/34yby46h

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jun1465

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Sweetening natural gas by removing CO₂ is crucial for achieving pipeline requirements, increasing calorific value, and reducing corrosion and environmental problems. Adsorption of CO₂ from natural gas was studied using activated carbons made from locally obtained waste materials: bamboo, coconut shell, and cow bone. Bamboo- (BAC), coconut shell- (CAC), and cow bone-derived (CBC) activated carbons were produced by carbonising precursors at 500°C and chemically activating them with KOH at 700°C.

Keywords : Activated Carbon; CO2 Adsorption; Natural Gas Sweetening; Waste Valorisation; Fixed-Bed Adsorption.

References :

  1. International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook 2023. Paris: IEA; 2023. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2023
  2. Kidnay AJ, Parrish WR, McCartney DG. Fundamentals of natural gas processing. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429465956
  3. Ben-Mansour R, Habib MA, Bamidele OE, Basha M, Qasem NAA, Peedikakkal A, et al. Carbon capture by physical adsorption: Materials, experimental investigations and numerical modeling and simulations – A review. Appl Energy. 2016;161:225-255.
  4. British Petroleum. BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2024. London: BP; 2024.
  5. Haider J, Qyyum MA, Hussain A, Yasin M, Lee M. State-of-the-art commercial membranes for CO₂ separation: A review of the latest developments in materials and processes. Rev Chem Eng. 2020;36(5):531-569.
  6. Padurean A, Cormos CC, Agachi PS. Pre-combustion carbon dioxide capture by gas–liquid absorption for Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle power plants. Int J Greenh Gas Control. 2012;7:1-11.
  7. Lock O, Hurst A, McCartney R. Natural gas sweetening using membranes. J Pet Sci Eng. 2015;127:99-110.
  8. Qasem NAA, Ben-Mansour R. Adsorption breakthrough and cycling stability of carbon dioxide separation from CO₂/N₂/H₂O mixture under humid conditions using CuBTC and MgCuBTC for biogas upgrading applications. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2018;43(25):11157-11168.
  9. Grande CA, Rodrigues AE, Oliveira ELG. Adsorption kinetics of propane and propylene in zeolite 4A. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2008;47(18):7213-7218.
  10. Riboldi L, Bolland O. Overview on pressure swing adsorption (PSA) as CO₂ capture technology: State-of-the-art, limits and potentials. Energy Procedia. 2017;114:2390-2400.
  11. Kola A, Olalere OA, Ighalo JO. CO₂ adsorption performance of activated carbon prepared from olive waste. J Environ Chem Eng. 2023;11(1):109098.
  12. Sarwar A, Ali GH, Haider J, Shah NS, Zaman S. Synthesis of novel adsorbent by intercalation of biopolymer in LDH for the removal of arsenic from synthetic and natural water. J Clean Prod. 2021;313:127908.
  13. Nawar A, Ghenai C, Jaber L, Sid Ahmed M, Ammar M. Recycling waste tires into crumb rubber and the transition to renewable energy sources: UAE case study. J Energy Resour Technol. 2020;142(12):122001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047930
  14. Ibrahim MA, Abdel-Rahman AA, Hussien MS. CO₂ adsorption of activated carbon prepared from olive stones. Adsorption. 2020;26(2):163-174.
  15. Alviani VN, Yek PNY, Lock SSM, Chan YH. A sustainable temperature-swing process for CO₂ capture and mineralization at below 100°C using a recyclable chelating agent and bottom ash. Chem Eng J. 2024;491:151942.
  16. Subraveti GS, Roussanaly S, Anantharaman R, Riboldi L, Rajendran A. Techno-economic assessment of optimised vacuum swing adsorption for post-combustion CO₂ capture from steam-methane reformer flue gas. Sep Purif Technol. 2021;256:117832.
  17. Danaci D, Webley PA, Petit C. Guidelines for techno-economic analysis of adsorption processes. Front Chem Eng. 2021;2:602430.
  18. Vyawahare G, Jadhav P, Jadhav R, Aware C, Patil C, Gophane A, et al. Strategies for crystal violet dye sorption and recovery using biochars produced from agricultural wastes. Sci Total Environ. 2023;873:162275.
  19. Wilkes MD, Brown S, Adams SR, Cascarini de Torre LE, Arnold PL, Vitorica-Yrezabal IJ. CO₂ capture by aqueous Na₂CO₃ integrated with precipitation of MgCO₃ hydrate and selective adsorption by porous materials. Appl Energy. 2022;316:118958.
  20. Rehman A, Park SJ. Classification of phenols and nitroaromatics on nitrogen and sulfur co-doped hierarchical porous carbons via machine-learning methods. J Hazard Mater. 2019;368:724-732.
  21. Lee SY, Park SJ. A review on solid adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture. J Ind Eng Chem. 2015;23:1-11.
  22. Sumathi S, Bhatia S, Lee KT, Mohamed AR. Selection of best impregnated palm shell activated carbon (PSAC) for simultaneous removal of SO₂ and NO. Bioresour Technol. 2020;101(3):916-924.
  23. Erhueh GO, Orodu OD, Oyewole S, Digieneni Y. A critical review on the feasibility of commercial carbon capture and storage in Nigeria. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2024;26:713-735.
  24. Ochedi FO, Liu Y, Adewuyi YG. State-of-the-art review on capture of CO₂ using adsorbents prepared from oil palm shell. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2020;139:1-25.
  25. Lippens BC, de Boer JH. Studies on pore systems in catalysts: V. The t method. J Catal. 1965;4(3):319-323.
  26. Heo S, Yoo YH, Lee S, Bae S, Cho SY. Fabrication of bamboo-based activated carbon for low-level CO₂ adsorption toward sustainable indoor air. Sustainability. 2024;16(4):1634.
  27. Wu W, Cai Y, Zhu K, Li H, Zhang R, Ling S, et al. Synthesis and characterization of magnetic K₂CO₃-activated carbon produced from bamboo shoot for the adsorption of Rhodamine b and CO₂ capture. Fuel. 2023;332:126099.
  28. Negara DNKP, Putra PA, Negara DNKP. The surface properties of bamboo-activated carbon activated using H₃PO₄ agent with different activation temperatures. AIP Conf Proc. 2023;2568:040015.
  29. Dziejarski B, Krzyżyńska R, Andersson K, Jirjis R. CO₂ capture materials: A review of current trends and future challenges. Mater Today Sustain. 2023;24:100483.
  30. Kundu S, Chowdhury A, Naskar S. A comprehensive review of enhanced CO₂ capture using activated carbon derived from biomass feedstock. RSC Adv. 2024;14(32):22678-22704.
  31. Chaturvedi K, Singh AP, Mandal A, Verma N. Bamboo for producing charcoal and biochar for versatile applications. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2023;13(2):1825-1840.
  32. Ji Y, Luo J, Wu X, Wei Y, Liu L, Huang F, et al. A high adsorption capacity bamboo biochar for CO₂ capture for low temperature heat utilization. Sep Purif Technol. 2022;293:121132.
  33. Al-Ghurabi EH, Abdelrahman M, Quddus MR, Ali S, Yamani ZH, Tawabini B. Optimizing the synthesis of nanoporous activated carbon from date-palm waste for enhanced CO₂ capture. Nanomaterials. 2025;15(3):456.
  34. González-Arias J, Sánchez ME, Cara-Jiménez J, Martínez EJ, Gómez X. Understanding the role of biochar in affecting BDE-47 biodegradation by Pseudomonas plecoglossicida: An integrated study on metabolic and mechanistic processes. Sci Total Environ. 2024;907:167889.
  35. Thommes M, Kaneko K, Neimark AV, Olivier JP, Rodriguez-Reinoso F, Rouquerol J, et al. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem. 2015;87(9-10):1051-1069.
  36. Sing KSW, Everett DH, Haul RAW, Moscou L, Pierotti RA, Rouquérol J, et al. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984). Pure Appl Chem. 1985;57(4):603-619.
  37. Bakti AI, Gareso PL, Rauf N. Characterization of active carbon from coconut shell using X-ray diffraction (X-RD) and SEM-EDX techniques. J Penelit Fis Apl. 2018;8(2)
  38. Gibson JAA, Mangano E, Shiko E, Greenaway AG, Gromov AV, Lozinska MM, et al. Adsorption materials and processes for carbon capture from gas-fired power plants: AMPGas. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2016;55(13):3840-3851.
  39. Saleem J, Zubair M, Shahid UB, Shakir S, Hussain M. High-performance activated carbon from coconut shells for dye removal: Study of isotherm and thermodynamics. Heliyon. 2024;10(17):e36399.
  40. Haider R, Shahid MZ, Lock SSM, Hussein N, Ramli RM. Sustainable activated carbon derived from coconut shell and betel nuts for energy storage and environmental remediation. Diam Relat Mater. 2025;151:111669.
  41. Heliani KR, Nurkholis A, Sugiarto Y, Suciyati SW. Screen printed carbon electrode from coconut shell char for lead ions detection. Int J Renew Energy Dev. 2024;13(4):576-583.
  42. Azmi NZM, Ismail NA, Ahmad F. Enhancing the CO2 adsorption with dual functionalized coconut shell-hydrochar using Chlorella microalgae and metal oxide: Synthesis, physicochemical properties & mechanism evaluations. J Clean Prod. 2024;451:142184.
  43. Yami TL. Low-cost chemically activated cow bone for fluoride removal from drinking water [dissertation]. Norman: University of Oklahoma; 2017.
  44. Cazetta AL, Vargas AMM, Nogami EM, Kunita MH, Guilherme MR, Martins AC, et al. Thermally activated carbon from bovine bone: Optimization of synthesis conditions by response surface methodology. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2014;105:177-185.
  45. Shiryaev AA, Averin AA, Petrov DV. Microporosity and nanostructure of activated carbons: characterization by X-ray diffraction and scattering, Raman spectroscopy. Carbon. 2023;212:118143.
  46. Muretta JE, Jones CW, Lively RP. Unique chemistry and structure of pyrolyzed bovine bone for enhanced aqueous metals adsorption. Waste Biomass Valorization. 2023;14(5).
  47. Hart A, Omorogie MO, Wood J. Enhanced CO₂ adsorption using cow bone-derived activated char. J Clean Prod. 2023;414:137709.
  48. Mpofu B, Mukaya HE, Nkazi DB. Mineral carbonation process of carbon dioxide using animal bone. Sci Prog. 2021;104(2).

Sweetening natural gas by removing CO₂ is crucial for achieving pipeline requirements, increasing calorific value, and reducing corrosion and environmental problems. Adsorption of CO₂ from natural gas was studied using activated carbons made from locally obtained waste materials: bamboo, coconut shell, and cow bone. Bamboo- (BAC), coconut shell- (CAC), and cow bone-derived (CBC) activated carbons were produced by carbonising precursors at 500°C and chemically activating them with KOH at 700°C.

Keywords : Activated Carbon; CO2 Adsorption; Natural Gas Sweetening; Waste Valorisation; Fixed-Bed Adsorption.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - July - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe