Authors : Sharath Kumar Shetty; Mahesh Kumar Y; Suchithra B K

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 4 - April

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/26w973sx

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/tzf75txw

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24APR2253

Abstract : AIM: The study aimed at comparing the amount of space closure using peizocision (PZ) and micro- osteoperforation (MOP) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT). Materials and methods: A retrospective study consisted of 3 groups, sample number of minimum 8 patients per group were estimated using statistical model called an Analysis of Variance, or ANOVA model. Three sets of data were collected. Which included patients who were treated with upper first premolar extraction for en- masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth using NiTi closed coil spring with regional acceleratory procedures. The data collected was divided into 3 groups, GROUP 1- micro osteo perforations (n=8), GROUP 2- photo bio modulation (n=8), GROUP 3- peizocision (n=8).sing digital Vernier calipers, a direct approach was used to measure all the stone casts obtained before canine retraction (T0) and after the retraction was completed after three months (T1). The statistical analysis was performed on the data acquired about the amount of space closure of en-masse retraction of maxillary anteriors in the PZ, LLLT, and MOP groups. Results: Compared to MOP (2.60mm) and LLLT (2.44mm), the PZ group had a greater mean amount of space closure (5.06mm). In conclusion, the quantity of space closure in piezocision was significantly higher than that in MOP and LLLT, although there was no statistically significant difference between the two. It is imperative that treatment duration be shortened. Finding the most effective and practical method to speed up tooth movement using the biomechanical mechanisms that are currently in place is therefore necessary

Keywords : Accelerated Orthodontics Micro Osteo Perforation, Peizocision, Low-Level Laser Therapy, Space Closure, En Masse Retraction.

References :

1. Fink DF, Smith RJ. The duration of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;102(1):45-51.
2. Andrade Jr I, Sousa ABS, Silva GG. New therapeutic modalities to modulate orthodontic tooth movement. Dental Press J. Orthod. 2014;19(6):123-33.
3. Evaluation and Comparison of the Rate of Canine Retraction Using Two Accelerated Orthodontic Treatment Techniques: An In Vivo Study Aishwarya Ramkumar1 , Raghunath N2 , Avinash BS
4. Frost, Harold M. The regional acceleratory phenomenon: A review. Henry Ford Hospital Medical Journal. 1983;31(1):03-09.
5. Shenava S, Nayak KU, Bhaskar V, Nayak A. Accelerated orthodontics–A review. Int Journal of Scientific Study. 2014;1(5):35-39.
6. Keser E, Naini FB. Accelerated orthodontic tooth movement: surgical techniques and the regional acceleratory phenomenon. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Jan 5;44(1):
7. Yaffe A, Fine N, Binderman I (1994) Regional accelerated phenomenon in the mandible following mucoperiosteal flap surgery. J Periodontol 65(1):79– 83.
8.   Wilcko WM, Wilcko T, Bouquot JE, Ferguson DJ (2001) Rapid orthodontics with alveolar reshaping: two case reports of decrowding. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 21(1):9–19
9. Kim SJ, Park YG, Kang SG (2009) Effects of corticision on paradental remodeling in orthodontic tooth movement. Angle Orthod 79(2):284–291.
10. Dibart S, Sebaoun JD, Surmenian J (2009) Piezocision: a minimally invasive, periodontally accelerated orthodontic tooth movement procedure. Compend Contin Educ Dent 30:342–344 346, 348–350 23.
11.  Kotrikova B, Wirtz R, Kremlin R, Blank J, Eggers G, Samiotis A, Muhling J (2006) Piezosurgery- a new safe technique in cranial osteoclasts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35(5):461–465.
12. Cheung T, Park J, Lee D, et al. Ability of mini-implant-facilitated micro-osteoperforations to accelerate tooth movement in rats. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;150(6):958–967.
13. Teixeira CC, Khoo E, Tran J, et al. Cytokine expression and accelerated tooth movement. J Dent Res 2010;89:1135e41.
14. Baloul SS, Gerstenfeld LC, Morgan EF, Carvalho RS, Van Dyke TE, Kantarci A. Mechanism of action and morphologic changes in the alveolar bone in response to selective alveolar decortication-facilitated tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139(4 Suppl):S83e101
15. Alikhani M, Raptis M, Zoldan B, et al. Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:639e48.
16. JOSEPH A, Prashantha GS, SABRISH S, SAGARKAR R, MATHEW S. Comparison of Rate of Tooth Movement, Root Resorption and Pulp Vitality during En masse Anterior Retraction with Micro-osteoperforation and Low Level Laser Therapy: A Randomised Clinical Trial. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research. 2022 Aug 1;16(8).
17. Garg NJ, Singh G, Kannan S, Rai D, Kaul A, Gupta A, Goyalia A, Gupta G. Effect of 810 nm diode laser therapy on the rate of extraction space closure. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society. 2014 Jul;48(3):143-8.
18. Effect of 810 nm Diode Laser Therapy on the Rate of Extraction Space Closure. The Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society. 48. 143-148. 10.5005/jp-journals-10021-1235.
19. Keser EI, Dibart S. Sequential piezocision: a novel approach to accelerated orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Dec;144(6):879-89.
20. Ramkumar A, Raghunath N, Avinash BS. Evaluation and comparison of the rate of canine retraction using two accelerated orthodontic treatment techniques: An in vivo study. World. 2020;11(2).
21. Abbas NH, Sabet NE, Hassan IT. Evaluation of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics and piezocision in rapid canine retraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;149(4):473–480.