Authors : Aidawayati Rangkuti; Rahman Aulia

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 9 - September

---

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3pvmuzdf

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3656w7zh

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25sep544

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

---

Abstract : This study aims to determine which method yields the shortest project duration between the Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) and Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM). The results indicate that CCPM produces a faster project completion time. With the addition of buffers, the project completion duration using CCPM is 28,5 days. In comparison, the shortest project duration with the PERT method requires 35 days with a success probability of 0,13%, while the longest duration is 45 days with a success probability of 99,87%.

Keywords : Project Management, Scheduling, Speed Boat, PERT, CCPM.

References :

1. Fazri, M., Widiastuti, M., & al, M. (2020). Time Acceleration Analysis Using the Time Cost Trade Off Method in the Construction Project of Rusun 1, Samarinda City, East Kalimantan. Civil Engineering Technology, 3(2), 1–14.
2. Violina, R. (2022). Optimization of Construction Project Implementation Using Critical Path Method and Least Cost Analysis (Case Study: Bridge on the Siak-Perawang Regency Border Section) (Doctoral dissertation, State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau).
3. Fahri, M. I., Rakhmawati, F., & Panjaitan, D. J. (2024). Time and Cost Optimization of Box Underpass Construction in the Sigli–Banda Aceh Toll Road Project Using PERT and EVM Methods. MAATH: Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 44–56.
4. Suyuti, A. M., & Basuki, M. (2022, March). Comparative Analysis of Project Scheduling Using Critical Path Method (CPM) and Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM) on the Repair of BG. KFT 8005 Ship. In Proceedings of SENASTITAN: National Seminar on Sustainable Industrial Technology (Vol. 2, pp. 152–165).
5. Rangkuti, A. (2022). 7 Models of Operations Research and Their Applications. Brilian International, Sidoarjo.
6. Daulay, M. T., Munarsih, E., Muafiqie, H., Alkadrie, S. A., Sukasmanto, S. E., John Suarlin, S. E., & Suparman, S. E. (2022). Basic Concepts of Project Management in the 4.0 Era. CV Rey Media Grafika.
7. Arrumih, K., & Astuti, Y. P. (2020). Optimization of Construction Project Scheduling Problems Using PERT–CPM Method. MATHunesa: Scientific Journal of Mathematics, 8(2), 110–119.
8. Iluk, T., Ridwan, A., & Winarto, S. (2020). Application of CPM and PERT Methods in the 3-Story Parking Building Project of Grand Panglima Polim Kediri. Journal of Civil Engineering Technology Management, 3(2), 162–176.
9. Iluk, T., Ridwan, A., & Winarto, S. (2020). Application of CPM and PERT Methods in the 3-Story Parking Building Project of Grand Panglima Polim Kediri. Journal of Civil Engineering Technology Management, 3(2), 162–176.
10. Yuwono, W., Kaukab, M. E., & Mahfud, Y. (2021). A Study on the PERT–CPM Method and Its Utilization in Time and Cost Management of Project Implementation. Journal of Economic, Management, Accounting and Technology, 4(2), 192–210.
11. Tjendani, H. T. (2024). Scheduling and Financing Analysis in the Urban Slum Area Quality Improvement Project of Sungai Kapih II, Samarinda Using Critical Chain Project Management Method. Journal of Scientech Research and Development, 6(1), 140–150.
12. Mufahri, A., & Oetomo, W. (2023). Cost and Time Analysis in the Construction of Level III Brawijaya Hospital Surabaya Using Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM) Method. Scientific Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 3(1), 852–864.