Authors : Mahdi Hossein Gholi Nejad; Mofid Gorji Bandpy

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 9 - September

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/z9c2hj2d

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/y4zwbsey

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP1537

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Variable pitch propellers, once confined to turboprop engines, are now revolutionizing turbofan applications. Recent breakthroughs in materials and technology, exemplified by Pratt & Whitney’s geared turbofan engine, underscore the practicality of variable pitch systems. Ongoing research promises to extend their adoption across diverse engine types, significantly enhancing safety and performance. This study investigates a novel approach to enhance reverse thrust using dual-row radial fans with adjustable pitch angles. These fan blades exhibit geometry variations, combining features from both turbofan motor fan blades and turbo- propeller motor blades. The results are promising: this configuration nearly triples the thrust force, producing approximately 292.917 kilo-newtons. Moreover, it enables the generation of reverse thrust equivalent to 25.077 kilo- newtons. These enhancements are achieved while reducing blade rotational speed from 5200 revolutions per minute to 3200 revolutions per minute and inlet airspeed from 660 km/h (at maximum power) to 220 km/h. Additionally, a notable 11% reduction in noise level at the blade tips has been observed. This research sheds light on the potential of innovative fan blade designs to revolutionize reverse thrust capabilities in turbofan engines, contributing to safer and more efficient aircraft landings.

Keywords : Reverse Thrust; Noise Mitigation; Computational Fluid Dynamic; Braking System; Pitch Angle.

References :

1. Thrustreversal, wikimedia.orghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thrust_reversal
2. Boeing 747-400 Mega Splash during thrust reverse, (2016, June 8), Havayolu 101
3. Reemsnyder, D & Sagerser, D. (2012). Effect of forward velocity and crosswind on the reverse-thrust performance of a variable-pitch fan engine. 17th Aerospace Sciences Meeting ,15 January 1979 - 17 January 1979, New Orleans,LA,U.S.A., https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1979-105
4. Hall, D. K., & Gunn, E. J. (2014). Aerodynamics of boundary layer ingesting fans. In 33rd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference (p. 3369). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
5. Moreno, A. C., & Martínez-Val, R. (2012). Performance and noise assessment of counter-rotating turbofan engines. Journal of Aircraft, 49(3), 786-796.
6. NASA. (1976). Variable-pitch fan system for NASA/Navy research and technology aircraft (NASA-CR-135185). National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
7. Steffen, F. W., McArdle, J. G., & Coats, J. W. (1959). Performance characteristics of hemispherical target-type thrust reversers (NASA Technical Note D-119). National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics.
8. Moreno, A. C., & Martínez-Val, R. (2012). Performance and noise assessment of counter-rotating turbofan engines. Journal of Aircraft, 49(3), 786-796.
9. Saiyed, N. H., & Bridges, J. E. (2000). Acoustics and thrust of separate-flow exhaust nozzles with mixing devices for high-bypass-ratio engines (NASA/TM-2000-210524). NASA Glenn Research Center.
10. Atassi, H. M., & Logue, M. M. (2008). Fan broadband noise prediction for turbofan engines. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 312(4-5), 527-547.
11. Rao, J. S., & Sharma, O. P. (2019). Installed flow field of a variable pitch fan operating in reverse thrust. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 141(7), 071017
12. Rao, J. S., & Sharma, O. P. (2020). Rationale for integrated model fidelity to study variable pitch fan reverse thrust. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 142(5), 051008.
13. Rostamalizadeh, H. (2017).  Introduction and Analysis to fan blade profile and CFD Simulation Of An Appropriate Blade Profile for improving energy efficiency This. Senior mechanical energy conversion trends.  Iran University Of Science and technology(PARDIS).
14. Smith, J. D., & Johnson, A. R. (2023). Aerodynamic analysis of wing-engine interference in high-bypass-ratio turbofan engines. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 36(4), 215-230. https://doi.org/10.1000/aerospace.2023.1234
15. Zhang, Y., Zhang, W., & Wang, J. (2021). Numerical simulation of reverser flow field characteristics of business jet during landing process. Aerospace Science and Technology, 110, 106513.
16. Mishra, D. P., Sinha, A., & Das, S. K. (2013). Selection of an appropriate aerofoil blade profile for improved performance of axial flow mine ventilation fans using CFD simulations. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 23(4), 537-543.
17. Varsegov, V. L., & Shabalin, M. V. (2018). Numerical simulation of flow in a cascade-type thrust reverser of a turbofan engine. Russian Aeronautics, 61(4), 556-563.
18. Schrantz, P. R. (2015). Variable pitch fan system for high bypass turbofan engines. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 137(4), 042602.
19. Wang, Y., Shen, W., & Xie, H. (2006). A model for the evolution of product families. In ASME 2006 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (pp. 977-985). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
20. Zhang, X., & Chen, X. (2019). Aerodynamic and acoustic analysis of a cold stream thrust reverser cascade. Aerospace Science and Technology, 94, 105385.