Conceptual Understanding of Mathematics in Artificial Intelligence Era: A Comparative Study of Pre and Post-CHATGPT Access among Student Teachers


Authors : Gift Muke Kazika; Sarah Chama; Chewe Luaba; John Masumba Kayawe

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 1 - January


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/47564pk7

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3mhkmxfy

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14869973


Abstract : The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in education, particularly tools such as ChatGPT, has introduced both opportunities and challenges for enhancing learning outcomes. This study examined the impact of ChatGPT on mathematics understanding. It compared teacher education students with and without access to the tool. The study was conducted at Mansa College of Education and used a concurrent mixed-methods approach. The study focused on quantitative analysis of assignment and test results from the 2018 and 2024 cohorts. While the qualitative aspect was used to get perspectives from students through focus group discussion and phone interview. The findings indicated that while 2024 students (with ChatGPT access) performed better on assignments, the 2018 cohort (without ChatGPT) outperformed them on tests which suggested that ChatGPT aids task completion but does not fully support deeper conceptual understanding. Qualitative results revealed that ChatGPT made concepts clearer and facilitated faster completion of assignments but it also posed challenges in obtaining feedback and reinforcing unclear concepts. The study concludes that ChatGPT enhances task efficiency, however, it limit understanding of the concepts. This emphasize the need for assessments that promote active engagement and critical thinking. The study recommends using quizzes and projects in place of written assignments in order to foster a deeper grasp of mathematics.

Keywords : Conceptual Understanding, Artificial Intelligent (AI), CHATGPT, Mathematics Education.

References :

  1. Adelegan, O. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on student performance in mathematics, science, and English. Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1-12.
  2. Akinwalere, S. N., & Ivanov, V. (2022). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Challenges and opportunities. Border Crossing, 12(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.33182/bc.v12i1.2015.
  3. Asare, B., Arthur, Y. D., & Boateng, F. O. (2023). Exploring the impact of ChatGPT on mathematics performance: The influential role of student interest. Educational Science Management, 1(3), 158-168. https://doi.org/10.56578/esm010304.
  4. Connolly, V., & Watson, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Opportunities and challenges for education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 15(1), 1-12.
  5. Da, C. V., Hanh, N. V., & Mai, D. T. T. (2023). Exploring the limitations of ChatGPT in mathematics education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 54(2), 257-272.
  6. Bai, L., Liu, X.  and Su, J. (2023). ChatGPT:The cognitive effects on learning and memory. Wiley Online 1(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/brx2.30
  7. Connolly, V. and Watson, S. (2023) ChatGPT: Opportunities and challenges for education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 15 (1), 1-12.
  8. Da, C. V., Hanh, N. V. and Mai, D. T. T. (2023). Exploring the limitations of ChatGPT in mathematics education’, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 54 (2), 257-272.
  9. Duong, T. T., Can, V. D., & Nguyen, V. H. (2024). The use of ChatGPT in teaching and learning: A systematic review through SWOT analysis approach. Frontiers in Education, 9.
  10. Egara, F. O., & Mosimege, M. (2024). Exploring the integration of artificial intelligence-based ChatGPT into mathematics instruction: Perceptions, challenges, and implications for educators. Education Sciences, 14(7), 742. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070742.
  11. Ellis, A. R., & Slade, E. (2023). A new era of learning: Considerations for ChatGPT as a tool to enhance statistics and data science education. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 31(2), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2023.2223609.
  12. Gondwe, G. (2023). ChatGPT and the Global South: How are journalists in sub-Saharan Africa engaging with generative AI? Online Media and Global Communication. https://doi.org/10.1515/omgc-2023-0023.
  13. Gouia-Zarrad, R., & Gunn, C. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A review of ChatGPT. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12(1), 1-15.
  14. Getenet, S. (2024). Pre-service teachers and ChatGPT in multistrategy problem-solving: Implications for mathematics teaching in primary schools. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 19(1), em0766. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/14141.
  15. Korkmaz Guler, N., Dertli, Z. G., Boran, E., & Yildiz, B. (2024). An artificial intelligence application in mathematics education: Evaluating ChatGPT’s academic achievement in a mathematics exam. Pedagogical Research, 9(2), em0188. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14145.
  16. Kumar, P., Singh, R., & Sharma, R. (2022). ChatGPT: A critical evaluation of its potential in education. Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 347-362.
  17. Mai, D. T. T., Da, C. V., & Hanh, N. V. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT on teacher autonomy and pedagogical concerns. Journal of Technology and Education, 18(1), 1-15.
  18. Malambo, P., Kazika, G. M., & Phiri, P. A. (2023). Impact of the activity and reality principles on learners’ achievement regarding systems of linear equations. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teachers, 3(1), em022. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/12609
  19. Messias, G., Rodrigues, U., Braga, L., Nakamura, W.T., Ferreira, B.M., Paiva, A., & Valentim, N.M. (2018). Education 4.0 and 21st Century Skills: A Case Study with Robotics Activities in Classroom. Anais do XXIX Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação (SBIE 2018).
  20. Mohamed, M. Z. B., Hidayat, R., Suhaizi, N. N. B., Sabri, N. B. M., Mahmud, M. K. H. B., & Baharuddin, S. N. B. (2022). Artificial intelligence in mathematics education: A systematic literature review. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(3), em0694. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12132.
  21. Pardos, Z. A., & Bhandari, D. (2024). Comparing learning gains from human tutor-authored and ChatGPT help in mathematics. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 11(1), 1-20.
  22. Polyportis, A., & Pahos, N. (2024). Understanding students’ adoption of the ChatGPT chatbot in higher education: The role of anthropomorphism, trust, design novelty, and institutional policy. Behaviour & Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2317364.
  23. Ramabu, T., & Malebane, T. (2024). Guidelines for effective use of ChatGPT in introductory programming education. In M. Cunningham & P. Cunningham (Eds.), IST-Africa 2024 Conference Proceedings (pp. 1–8). IST-Africa Institute and IIMC.
  24. Rudolph, J. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on mathematics education: A review. Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 1-12.
  25. Sain, Z. H., Vasudevan, A., Thelma, C. C., & Asfahani. (2024). Harnessing ChatGPT for effective assessment and feedback in education. Journal of Computer Science and Informatics Engineering (CoSIE), 3(2), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.
  26. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: A review. Cognition and Instruction, 5(4), 375-426.
  27. Watson, S. (2023). The limitations of ChatGPT in education: A critical perspective. Journal of Educational Research, 116(2), 145-155.
  28. Wardat, Y., Tashtoush, M. A., AlAli, R., & Jarrah, A. M. (2023). ChatGPT: A revolutionary tool for teaching and learning mathematics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), em2286. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13272.

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in education, particularly tools such as ChatGPT, has introduced both opportunities and challenges for enhancing learning outcomes. This study examined the impact of ChatGPT on mathematics understanding. It compared teacher education students with and without access to the tool. The study was conducted at Mansa College of Education and used a concurrent mixed-methods approach. The study focused on quantitative analysis of assignment and test results from the 2018 and 2024 cohorts. While the qualitative aspect was used to get perspectives from students through focus group discussion and phone interview. The findings indicated that while 2024 students (with ChatGPT access) performed better on assignments, the 2018 cohort (without ChatGPT) outperformed them on tests which suggested that ChatGPT aids task completion but does not fully support deeper conceptual understanding. Qualitative results revealed that ChatGPT made concepts clearer and facilitated faster completion of assignments but it also posed challenges in obtaining feedback and reinforcing unclear concepts. The study concludes that ChatGPT enhances task efficiency, however, it limit understanding of the concepts. This emphasize the need for assessments that promote active engagement and critical thinking. The study recommends using quizzes and projects in place of written assignments in order to foster a deeper grasp of mathematics.

Keywords : Conceptual Understanding, Artificial Intelligent (AI), CHATGPT, Mathematics Education.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe