Authors : Shatrunjay Kumar Singh

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 3 - March

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/mrmtcac2

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/55paw6zh

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26mar065

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : The present legal dockets and workflow management system function at a low level because it relies on human judgment and manual reactive scheduling methods. The research creates an original framework which employs Large Language Models (LLMs) to revolutionize legal forecasting operations. The system proposes to apply LLMs for analyzing unstructured legal information to detect hidden elements which affect case prediction accuracy by studying procedural obstacles and judicial decision patterns. The core innovation develops a theoretical framework which uses extracted features to build a probabilistic system that produces time-based forecasts for court milestones and displays case delay risks and enables users to assess various scenarios. The paper demonstrates how the system produces better predictions and strategic decisions, but it thoroughly analyzes three major ethical concerns which stem from data prejudices and model-generated false information and unexplainable system operations. The research framework enables new methods for active legal administration which start essential discussions about AI-based judicial development for future courts. The research establishes conditions which will enable future studies to link theoretical models with experimental laboratory testing.

Keywords : Large Language Models (LLMs), Legal Forecasting, Docket Management, Conceptual Framework, AI in Law, Temporal Reasoning, AI Ethics in Law

References :

1. Yang, X., Wang, Z., Wang, Q., Wei, K., Zhang, K., & Shi, J. (2024). Large language models for automated q&a involving legal documents: a survey on algorithms, frameworks and applications. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 20(4), 413-435.
2. Chan, E., Gore, K. N., & Jiang, E. (2023). Harnessing Artificial Intelligence in International Arbitration Practice. Contemp. Asia Arb. J., 16, 263.
3. Katz, D. M. (2012). Quantitative legal prediction-or-how i learned to stop worrying and start preparing for the data-driven future of the legal services industry. Emory LJ, 62, 909.
4. Homoki, P., & Ződi, Z. (2024). Large language models and their possible uses in law. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 64(3), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2023.00475
5. Nay, J. J., Kasai, J., Tao, W., Lee, A. T., Jain, R., Lawsky, S. B., Karamardian, D., Bhat, M., & Choi, J. H. (2024). Large language models as tax attorneys: a case study in legal capabilities emergence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 382(2270). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2023.0159
6. Hassani, S. (2024). Enhancing Legal Compliance and Regulation Analysis with Large Language Models. 507–511. https://doi.org/10.1109/re59067.2024.00065
7. Yang, X., Wang, Z., Wang, Q., Wei, K., Zhang, K., & Shi, J. (2024). Large language models for automated Q&A involving legal documents: a survey on algorithms, frameworks and applications. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 20(4), 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijwis-12-2023-0256
8. Liu, J., Yang, M., Yu, Y., Xu, H., Wang, T., Li, K., & Zhou, X. (2024). Advancing bioinformatics with large language models: components, applications and perspectives. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2401.04155
9. Livermore, M. A., Herron, F., & Rockmore, D. N. (2024). Language Model Interpretability and Empirical Legal Studies. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 180(2), 244–276. https://doi.org/10.1628/jite-2024-0009
10. Feretzakis, G., & Verykios, V. S. (2024). Trustworthy AI: Securing Sensitive Data in Large Language Models. AI, 5(4), 2773–2800. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai5040134
11. Feretzakis, G., Gkoulalas-Divanis, A., Verykios, V. S., & Papaspyridis, K. (2024). Privacy-Preserving Techniques in Generative AI and Large Language Models: A Narrative Review. Information, 15(11), 697. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15110697
12. Mischler, G., Li, Y., Bickel, S., Mehta, A., & Mesgarani, N. (2024). Contextual Feature Extraction Hierarchies Converge in Large Language Models and the Brain. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2401.17671
13. Luo, Z., Wang, R., Sun, Y., Liu, J., Chen, Z., & Zhang, Y.-J. (2024). Interpretable feature extraction and dimensionality reduction in ESM2 for protein localization prediction. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbad534
14. Yuan, C., Xie, Q., Huang, J., & Ananiadou, S. (2024). Back to the Future: Towards Explainable Temporal Reasoning with Large Language Models. 77, 1963–1974. https://doi.org/10.1145/3589334.3645376
15. Wang, Y., Shen, Y., Gu, J., Zhang, J., Ouyang, X., Cui, Q., Zhou, J., Li, S., Li, L., Wang, S., Chu, Z., Xue, S., & Hao, H. (2024). LLMRG: Improving Recommendations through Large Language Model Reasoning Graphs. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 38(17), 19189–19196. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v38i17.29887
16. Jin, B., Liu, G., Han, C., Jiang, M., Ji, H., & Han, J. (2023). Large Language Models on Graphs: A Comprehensive Survey. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2312.02783
17. Pan, S., Zheng, Y., & Liu, Y. (2024). Integrating Graphs With Large Language Models: Methods and Prospects. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 39(1), 64–68. https://doi.org/10.1109/mis.2023.3332242
18. Zhui, L., Fenghe, L., Xuehu, W., Qining, F., & Wei, R. (2024). Ethical Considerations and Fundamental Principles of Large Language Models in Medical Education: Viewpoint. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e60083. https://doi.org/10.2196/60083
19. Sanchez, T. W., Brenman, M., & Ye, X. (2024). The Ethical Concerns of Artificial Intelligence in Urban Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 91(2), 294–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2024.2355305
20. Hagendorff, T., & Danks, D. (2022). Ethical and methodological challenges in building morally informed AI systems. AI and Ethics, 3(2), 553–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00188-y
21. Mökander, J., Schuett, J., Kirk, H. R., & Floridi, L. (2023). Auditing large language models: a three-layered approach. AI and Ethics, 4(4), 1085–1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00289-2
22. Berengueres, J. (2024). How to Regulate Large Language Models for Responsible AI. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, 5(2), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1109/tts.2024.3403681
23. Su, J., Jiang, C., Jin, X., Qiao, Y., Xiao, T., Ma, H., Wei, R., Jing, Z., Xu, J., & Lin, J. (2024). Large Language Models for Forecasting and Anomaly Detection: A Systematic Literature Review. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2402.10350
24. Choudhury, M., & Haque, C. E. (2024). Disaster management policy changes in Bangladesh: Drivers and factors of a shift from reactive to proactive approach. Environmental Policy and Governance, 34(5), 445–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2094
25. Balasubramaniam, V., Khair, M., Jain, Prof. (Dr. ), Goel, O., & Mahadik, S. (2023). Effective Risk Mitigation Strategies in Digital Project Management. Innovative Research Thoughts, 9(1), 538–567. https://doi.org/10.36676/irt.v9.i1.1500
26. Wang, X., Liu, Z., Tong, W., & Xu, X. (2023). Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers-like large language models in patient safety and pharmacovigilance: A comprehensive assessment of causal inference implications. Experimental Biology and Medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 248(21). https://doi.org/10.1177/15353702231215895
27. Deng, Y., Chua, T.-S., Lei, W., Liao, L., Chen, L., & Wang, H. (2023, January 1). Prompting and Evaluating Large Language Models for Proactive Dialogues: Clarification, Target-guided, and non-collaboration. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.711
28. Parmar, M., Mashetty, S., Luo, M., Varshney, N., Patel, N., Nakamura, M., Baral, C., & Mitra, A. (2024). LogicBench: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models. 13679–13707. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.739