Authors :
Maryam Musa Bayawo; Devindi Geekiyanage; Shaba Kolo
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 3 - March
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/bdhwz93r
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/36r82hxm
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26mar736
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
This theoretical paper presents and argue that risk management issues bedeviling Nigerian Construction Industry
(NCI) results from narrow focus of previous studies on the risk management. As such, despite the phenomenon have been
studied for almost two decades—2010 to 2022—in Nigerian context, the industry is still affected by mismatch of decisions
within internal/external stakeholder group as well as between internal and external stakeholder groups. Based on a
combination of both sets of classical and enterprise risk management theories, the study conceptualized a perception of the
two NCI stakeholder groups in a project organizational setting. And using qualitative research approach, sixteen (16)
stakeholders—eight (8) in each of internal and external stakeholder groups—were interviewed based on Hegelian dialectic
approach to test the conceptual framework of the stakeholder perceptions. The results are analyzed by Braun and Clerk’
thematic analysis using NVivo, and themes and subthemes emerged forming a comparison diagram of the NCI’s
stakeholders perceptions on five risk management practices—Avoid, Retain, Share, Mitigate, and Transfer. Findings
indicate that three (i.e., avoid, share, mitigate) of these risk management practices are concordant in that less/no perceptual
conflict is likely to occur both within and between the two stakeholder groups. Whereas two (i.e., retain, transfer) are
discordant in that they represent an uneasy choice likely to trigger perceptual conflict both within and between the two
stakeholder groups, and thus supporting the conceptual framework. Consequently, this study shows that developing
strategies to curb the risks bedevilling public infrastructure building project in NCI depends on a better understanding of
the perceptions of both internal and external stakeholders involved in risk management practices in public infrastructure
building projects since stakeholder perception is crucial in any attempt to devise a risk management strategy for common
stakeholders involved in a project.
Keywords :
Risk Management, Stakeholders, Nigeria Construction Industry, Conceptual Framework
References :
- Abanis, M. (2018). Risks and risking construction projects: empirical review of existing knowledged in Kenya. Journal of Emerging Sciences and Innovation, 4(13).
- AbdEl-Karim, M. S., ElNawawy, O., & Abdel-Karim, A. (2015). Identification and assessment of risk factors affecting Construction Projects. HRBC Journal.
- Akoh, A. (2018). Construction Project Risk Management Framework for Nigeria Construction Industry. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester.
- Aminu, A. (2013). Risk Management in Nigeria Construction Industy. North Cyprus: unpublished Msc thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, East Medeterranian University.
- Baartz, T., Kantzkel, J., & Tom, B. (2003). Supply chain entities and sucess contributions and perspectives . Journal of project management science.
- Baloi, A. R. (2021). Risking Nigeria's resources to poor planning. Construction, Enginnering, and Management, 33(2), 133-141.
- Bashir, G. (2012). Risk management efforts; Saving the face of nigeria construction industry. 11th Conference of the Chartered Institutte of Buildings Nigeria. Lagos: CIOB Nigeria.
- Belel, Z., & Mahmood , H. (2021). Risk management practices in Nigeria Construction Industry: Case study of Yola. Continental Journal of Engineering Sciences, 7(3).
- Bosh-Sijtsema, R., & Tjell, P. (2017). Stakeholder effect as determing factor in organizational success. Internal journal of sucess engineering & forecast, 4(3).
- Chapman, J. (2001). Client perspective of project sucess: Traditional & Modern approaches . Journal of construction sucess and management .
- Charongamm, T., & Yen, X. (2019). Pros & Cons of risk management decisions. Journal management sciences and future attainment .
- Chitkara, K. (2012). Construction Project Management: Planning, Schedulling, & Controlling. Delhi: McGraw Hill.
- Choudry, R., & Iqbal, K. (2018). Identification of risk management system in construction industry in Pakistan. Journal of management & Engineering, 29(1), 42-49.
- Ezejiafor, C. (2018). Systematic review of factors of building collapes attributed to Nigeria construction industry. Journal of Building technology & managament, 33-51.
- Fatoki, E. (2016). Risk in planning of public projects: Systematic review. Journal Construction Management., 221-233.
- Flyvbjerg, P., Levvntij, V., & VonHomann, D. (2013). Diverse stakeholder perspectives: Comprehending stakeholder roles. Journal of Management sciences, 3(2)1.
- Folorunso, U., & Oyedele, J. O. (2015). Risk management of critical activities in construction projects: review of public works in Abuja Nigeria. Internal Journal of Construction & Engineering Risk Management, 39(2), 331-344.
- Gatti, S. (2008). Project Finance in Theory and Practice . London: Academic press.
- Heravi, H., Coffey, J., & Trigunasyah, W. (2015). Strategic roles and team performance in complex project organizational structure . Journal of project management and science of performance .
- Hiley, A., & Paliokostas, P. (2001). Value management and risk management: an examination of the potential for their integration as a combined management tool in the UK. Proceedings of the RICS Construction and Building research conference (COBRA '01), vol. 1, (pp. 27 - 36). Glasgow Scotland.
- Holmes, P. (2013). Construction & Infrastructure Projects: risk management by insurance. New York: Pearson.
- Kutch, G., & Hall, A. (2010). Participatory model of risk management: developing strategic involment of stakeholders. Journal of risk management theory .
- Odeyinka, J. (2008). Adherence to safety standards: ISO construction safety protocols . Journal of Construction Project Management and Engieering. 2(1).
- Ojo, A., & Ogunsemi, D. (2009). Assessment of contractor's understanding of risk management in Syechelles Construction Industry. Proceedings of RICS COBRA Research Conference, (pp. 73-86). Cape Town.
- Oyewobi, L., Ibrahim, D., & Ganiyu, B. (2012). Evaluating the impact of risk on contractor's tender figure in public building projects in northen Nigeria. Journal of Engineering, Projects, and Production Management, 2(1), 2-13.
- Srivastava, R., & Misra, A. (2011). Financial Management, 2nd ed. New Delhi: Oxford Higher Education.
- White, H., Stasis, W., & Lindkuist, V. (2016). Mapping important stakeholder roles on pettern of organizational achievements: distribution of work pettern. Journal of future studies & emerging management trends, 2(1).
- Wu, X., Kim , W., & Xin, M. (2019). Strategic risk analysis and risk management process: systematic comparisons. Journal of risk management of complex project undertakings.
- Yun, W., Lo, F., & Wan, T. (2016). Project management in complex stakeholder setting: Case of Wuhtang power generation plants. Journal Management of public works and resource planning in modern strategy , 55-67.
- Yusuwan, N. M., Adnan, H., Omar, A., & Jusoff, H. (2008). Clients’ perspectives of riskmanagement practice in Malaysian Construction Industry. Journal of Politcs and Law, Vol.1, No.3, 121 - 131.
This theoretical paper presents and argue that risk management issues bedeviling Nigerian Construction Industry
(NCI) results from narrow focus of previous studies on the risk management. As such, despite the phenomenon have been
studied for almost two decades—2010 to 2022—in Nigerian context, the industry is still affected by mismatch of decisions
within internal/external stakeholder group as well as between internal and external stakeholder groups. Based on a
combination of both sets of classical and enterprise risk management theories, the study conceptualized a perception of the
two NCI stakeholder groups in a project organizational setting. And using qualitative research approach, sixteen (16)
stakeholders—eight (8) in each of internal and external stakeholder groups—were interviewed based on Hegelian dialectic
approach to test the conceptual framework of the stakeholder perceptions. The results are analyzed by Braun and Clerk’
thematic analysis using NVivo, and themes and subthemes emerged forming a comparison diagram of the NCI’s
stakeholders perceptions on five risk management practices—Avoid, Retain, Share, Mitigate, and Transfer. Findings
indicate that three (i.e., avoid, share, mitigate) of these risk management practices are concordant in that less/no perceptual
conflict is likely to occur both within and between the two stakeholder groups. Whereas two (i.e., retain, transfer) are
discordant in that they represent an uneasy choice likely to trigger perceptual conflict both within and between the two
stakeholder groups, and thus supporting the conceptual framework. Consequently, this study shows that developing
strategies to curb the risks bedevilling public infrastructure building project in NCI depends on a better understanding of
the perceptions of both internal and external stakeholders involved in risk management practices in public infrastructure
building projects since stakeholder perception is crucial in any attempt to devise a risk management strategy for common
stakeholders involved in a project.
Keywords :
Risk Management, Stakeholders, Nigeria Construction Industry, Conceptual Framework