Authors : Bruce M. K. Mwiya; Joseph Phiri; Moffat Zimba; Catherine Mtambo; Doreen Zimba; Agness Nshindano; Bernadette Kaulungombe

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/abazk3ce

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3br2rr69

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr2082

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : In the transition toward a knowledge-based global economy, the apex of human capital—doctoral-level researchers—serves as the primary engine for national competitiveness and structural economic transformation. This article assesses the systemic gaps in advanced research training within developing economies, utilising Zambia as a primary case study. Through a Training Needs Assessment (TNA) of 55 master’s degree and professional qualification holders, this study evaluates existing self-efficacy in the research cycle. The findings reveal critical deficits in advanced data analysis, scholarly publication, and software utilisation. To harness doctoral education for national development, we argue that training paradigms must evolve beyond traditional academic silos to integrate advanced methodologies (such as structural equation modelling), robust intellectual property (IP) commercialisation structures, and strict alignment with macroeconomic frameworks like the National Development Plan (NDP) and Vision 2030. The article concludes with actionable policy and institutional implications for higher education architectures.

References :

1. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
2. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
3. Costley, C., & Lester, S. (2012). Work-based doctorates: professional extension at the highest levels. Studies in Higher Education, 37(3), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.503344
4. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
5. Overall, N. C., Deane, K. L., & Peterson, E. R. (2011). Promoting doctoral students’ research self-efficacy: combining academic guidance with autonomy support. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(6), 791–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.535508.
6. Kaulungombe B., Nsenduluka E., Banda K.M (2025), Examining the Mediating Role of Recognition and Appreciation in the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Internal Customer Satisfaction, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science 9(6) p. 5315-5334, https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.906000405
7. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235701029_Experiential_Learning_Experience_As_The_Source_Of_Learning_And_Development
8. Miles, D. A. (2017). A Taxonomy of Research Gaps: Identifying and Defining the Seven Research Gaps. Doctoral Student Workshop: Finding Research Gaps - Research Methods and Strategies, Dallas, Texas.
9. Mohamedbhai G. (2020) Quality assurance of doctoral education is now urgent, University World News, Africa Edition. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20200609091837168
10. Phiri, J., Mwiya, B., Zimba, M., Mtambo, C., & Nshindano, A. (2020). Doctorate Training Needs Assessment Report. Curriculum and Faculty Development, Northrise University.
11. Phiri J., Mwiya B., Sichinsambe C., Chisakulo E., Kabaye A., Kashinga R.J, Siachinji B., Mwenya A. (2023). Strengthening The Partnership Among Government, Academia and Industry to Promote Research and Innovation in Zambia, A National Science and Technology Council Commissioned Research Report, Lusaka, Zambia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18339.62248
12. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71–S102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725
13. UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO Science Report: The race against time for smarter development (S. Schneegans, T. Straza, & J. Lewis, Eds.). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377433
14. World Bank. (2023). Manufacturing value added (% of GDP – Zambia. World Bank National Accounts Data.
15. World Intellectual Property Organisation i.e. WIPO (2023). Global Innovation Index 2023: Innovation in the face of uncertainty. Geneva: WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/en/web/global-innovation-index/2023/index
16. Zambia Statistics Agency, i.e., ZSA (2013). 2010 Census of Population and Housing. Lusaka, Zambia.