⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Cybergogy: Innovative Pedagogical Practices for the Digital Era


Authors : Simpa Dolai

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/39j75f2b

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4z9v8vc4

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr397

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : The digital age has changed how we are taught and learn, making it imperative for educators to incorporate an innovative pedagogical approach is called cybergogy. It combines technology with teaching methods to create engaging and interactive experiences for students. Cybergogy is an essential concept for effective learning, given the growing dependency on digital platforms and online learning. This review paper to analyzes and combines available evidence on the influence of cybergogy: transforming learning in the digital age and highlights how teaching pedagogies, assessment practices, and even the interaction between teachers and students are transformed. The paper further analyses the opportunities and challenges that cybergogy offers to teacher educators preparing their trainees for a digital classroom.

Keywords : Cybergogy, Digital Learning, Online Education, Educational Technology.

References :

  1. Wang, M. J. & Kang,J.(2006). Cybergogy of engaged learning through information and communication technology: A framework for creating learner engagement. In D. Hung &
  2. M. S. Khine (Eds.), Engaged learning with emerging technologies (pp. 225-253). New York: Springer Publishing. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/1-4020-3669-8_11
  3. Wang, M. J. (2007). Designing online courses that effectively engage learners from diverse cultural backgrounds. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 294-311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00626.x
  4. Wang, M. J. (2008). Cybergogy for engaged learning. Journal of Open and Distance Education in China, 14(2), 14-22. 10.1007/1-4020-3669-8_11Piaget, J. (2013). The construction of reality in the child (Vol. 82). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315009650
  5. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1). Prentice Hall: Englewood cliffs. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960117700200317
  6. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017-1054. 10.1111/j.1467- 9620.2006.00684.x
  7. Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203125083
  8. McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). Personalised and self-regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1100
  9. Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2013). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.770404
  10. Sukarmin. (2023). Cybergogy yang Menjamin Interaksi Harmoni antara Guru, Peserta Didik dan Sumber Belajar. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika (pp. 1-5). Madiun: Universitas PGRI Madiun. https://prosiding.unipma.ac.id/index.php/SNPF/article/view/4264/3235
  11. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A. & Hall, C. (2016). NMC Horizon Report: 2016 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved February 22, 2025 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/171478/.
  12. Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
  13. Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: What is 'enhanced' and how do we know? Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.770404.
  14. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3 10. http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm
  15. Lysenko, L., Wade, C. A., Abrami, P. C., Iminza, R., & Kiforo, E. (2022). Self-regulated learning in Kenyan classrooms: A test of a process e-portfolio. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 63-82. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.1534a
  16. Solichin, M. M., Muhlis, A., & Ferdiant, A. G. (2021). Learning motivation as intervening in the influence of social support and self-regulated learning on learning outcome. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 945–964. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14355a
  17. Van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. John Wiley & Sons. https://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm
  18. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303
  19. West, D. M. (2018). The future of work: Robots, AI, and automation. Brookings Institution Press. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
  20. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive science, 12(2), 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7
  21. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  22. Li,G., 2012. Culturally contested Pedagogy: Battles of literacy and schooling between mainstream teachers and Asian immigrant parents. Sunny press
  23. “Definition of PEDAGOGY” Merriam-webster.com Retrieved January 9, 2019
  24. Anderson, T. (2008). The Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Athabasca University Press Schon, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic
  25. Books.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237473
  26. Joshi, A. (2021). Cummins College Bulletin on Engineering Education UNDERSTANDING ‘ 5 GOGY ’: PEDAGOGY , ANDRAGOGY, PEERAGOGY , Cummins College Bulletin on Engineering Education Andragogy. December 2021, 1–7.

The digital age has changed how we are taught and learn, making it imperative for educators to incorporate an innovative pedagogical approach is called cybergogy. It combines technology with teaching methods to create engaging and interactive experiences for students. Cybergogy is an essential concept for effective learning, given the growing dependency on digital platforms and online learning. This review paper to analyzes and combines available evidence on the influence of cybergogy: transforming learning in the digital age and highlights how teaching pedagogies, assessment practices, and even the interaction between teachers and students are transformed. The paper further analyses the opportunities and challenges that cybergogy offers to teacher educators preparing their trainees for a digital classroom.

Keywords : Cybergogy, Digital Learning, Online Education, Educational Technology.

Paper Submission Last Date
30 - April - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe