Authors : Olusegun O. Fasanmi; Olagunju A. Kehinde; Tosin A. Fasanmi; Adeshola Fashola

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 11 - November

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yt2e3wsz

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4jnh9t2z

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25nov557

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : The 1999 Constitution of Nigeria establishes Local Government Areas (LGAs) as the third tier of government, with direct responsibility for frontline services like primary healthcare, basic education, and sanitation. However, LGAs remain the weakest link in the federal system, constrained by overlapping functions with state ministries, fiscal dependence through state- managed Joint Accounts, insufficient administrative capacity, and irregular elections that erode local accountability. These structural issues have resulted in chronic service delivery failures across the country. This study evaluates how devolving genuine political, administrative, and fiscal power to LGAs can improve policy responsiveness and service delivery. Drawing on comparative evidence from Kenya’s devolution and Brazil’s participatory budgeting, the analysis is grounded in theoretical perspectives of agency theory, participatory democracy, and public choice. The findings indicate that LGAs are better positioned to address community needs when equipped with clear mandates, reliable funding, professional staff, digital tools, and robust accountability mechanisms. Nigerian examples, such as Kaduna’s open budget portal and Lagos’s waste management partnerships, demonstrate this transformative potential. The study concludes with a phased 36-60 month implementation roadmap, emphasizing that decentralization is not merely a technical exercise but a political economy challenge requiring broad- based coalitions for sustainable reform.

Keywords : Decentralization, Local Governance, Service Delivery, Nigeria, Policy Responsiveness, Intergovernmental Relations.

References :

1. Abonyi, N. (2018). Intergovernmental relations and local governance in Nigeria: Issues and challenges. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 8(3), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v8i3.13572
2. Ayee, J. R. A. (2019). Decentralization and governance in Africa. African Journal of Political Science, 13(1), 1–19.
3. Bardhan, P. (2002). Decentralization of governance and development. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(4), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533002320951037
4. Conyers, D. (2007). Decentralisation and service delivery: Lessons from sub-Saharan Africa. IDS Bulletin, 38(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2007.tb00334.x
5. Federal Republic of Nigeria. (1999). Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended). Lagos: Federal Government Printer.
6. Faguet, J.-P. (2014). Decentralization and governance. World Development, 53, 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.002
7. Fjeldstad, O.-H., & Heggstad, K. (2012). Building local government capacity for improved service delivery in Nigeria: Lessons from decentralization in East Africa. CMI Working Paper 2012:3.
8. Government of Kenya. (2010). The Constitution of Kenya, 2010. Nairobi: Government Printer.
9. International Monetary Fund. (2020). Fiscal decentralization and service delivery in sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: IMF Publications.
10. Khemani, S. (2015). Political economy of public service provision. World Bank Research Observer, 30(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lku006
11. Lagos State Government. (2022). Public-private partnerships in waste management: Annual performance report 2021–2022. Lagos State Ministry of Environment.
12. Olowu, D., & Wunsch, J. S. (2004). Local governance in Africa: The challenges of democratic decentralization. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
13. Onyekpere, E. (2020). Fiscal autonomy of local governments in Nigeria: Constraints and prospects. Centre for Social Justice Policy Paper, 7(2), 45–63.
14. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). Making decentralisation work: A handbook for policy-makers. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/g2g9faa7-en
15. Osaghae, E. E. (2021). Federalism and the management of diversity in Nigeria. Ibadan University Press.
16. Smoke, P. (2015). Rethinking decentralization: Assessing challenges to a popular public sector reform. Public Administration and Development, 35(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1703
17. Transparency International. (2021). Nigeria: Subnational governance and corruption risks report. Berlin: Transparency International.
18. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2020). Strengthening local governance for sustainable development in Africa. New York: UNDP.
19. World Bank. (2019). Improving local government performance: Lessons from reform implementation in Nigeria. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.

20. World Bank. (2021). Kenya Devolution Support Programme: Implementation status report. Washington, DC: World Bank.