⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Deconstructing Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Variance Decomposition Analysis of SME Performance in Kabwe District, Zambia


Authors : Simasiku Mwiya Mufalali; John Moose; Edwin Bbenkele; Regina Muduli; Mukwalikuli Mundia; Jimmy Sikachelela; Jackson Sishumba

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yc35jdv9

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/456f3uc4

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr1645

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This study examines how individual dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation (EO) influence SME performance in an emerging economy context, addressing the unresolved question of which EO dimensions matter, and why. Using data from 262 trading SMEs in Kabwe District, Zambia, the study employs hierarchical multiple regression with HC3 robust standard errors, nonlinear modeling, and Shapley value decomposition to assess both statistical significance and relative importance of EO dimensions. The results show that EO explains a substantial proportion of variance in performance (ΔR² = 0.302). Innovativeness and autonomy emerge as the only statistically significant predictors, while proactiveness, risk-taking, and competitive aggressiveness are not significant in net-effect models. However, relative importance analysis reveals that all EO dimensions contribute meaningfully to explained variance, indicating divergence between coefficient significance and practical importance. Additionally, risk-taking exhibits a significant inverted U-shaped relationship with performance, suggesting optimal rather than linear effects. The study contributes by advancing a multidimensional and context-sensitive understanding of EO, introducing a variance-based analytical approach, and providing empirical evidence from Zambia - an underrepresented context in entrepreneurship research. The findings highlight the need to reconceptualize EO as a system of uneven strategic contributions shaped by institutional and resource constraints.

Keywords : Entrepreneurial Orientation; SME Performance; Variance Decomposition; Emerging Economies; Zambia.

References :

  1. Abor, J., & Quartey, P. (2010). Issues in SME development in Ghana and South Africa. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 39, 218–228.
  2. Amoah, S. K., & Amoah, A. K. (2018). The role of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) to employment in Ghana. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 7(5), 151–157.
  3. Ayyagari, M., Beck, T., & Demirgüç-Kunt, A. (2011). Small and medium enterprises across the globe: A new database. World Bank Economic Review, 25(2), 199–224.
  4. Ayyagari, M., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2014). Who creates jobs in developing countries? Small Business Economics, 43(1), 75–99.
  5. Bank of Zambia, & International Labour Organization. (2021). Zambia SME sector performance report. Bank of Zambia.
  6. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
  7. Beck, T., & Demirgüç-Kunt, A. (2006). Small and medium-size enterprises: Access to finance as a growth constraint. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(11), 2931–2943.
  8. Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2005). Financial and legal constraints to firm growth: Does firm size matter? Journal of Finance, 60(1), 137–177.
  9. Boso, N., Story, V. M., & Cadogan, J. W. (2013). Entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation, network ties, and performance: Study of entrepreneurial firms in a developing economy. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(6), 708–727.
  10. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H. L. (2013). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(3), 421–440.
  11. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Obloj, K. (2008). Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Where are we today and where should the research go? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 1–14.
  12. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
  13. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87.
  14. Covin, J. G., & Wales, W. J. (2019). Crafting high-impact entrepreneurial orientation research: Some suggested guidelines. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1), 3–18.
  15. Fatoki, O. (2014). The causes of the failure of new small and medium enterprises in South Africa. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(20), 922–927.
  16. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
  17. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM). (2019). Global report 2018/2019. GEM Consortium.
  18. Green, S. B. (1991). How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26(3), 499–510.
  19. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  20. Hayes, A. F., & Cai, L. (2007). Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 709–722.
  21. Hughes, M., & Morgan, R. E. (2007). Deconstructing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(5), 651–661.
  22. Hult, G. T. M., Hurley, R. F., & Knight, G. A. (2004). Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(5), 429–438.
  23. International Finance Corporation (IFC). (2019). MSME finance gap: Assessment of the shortfalls and opportunities in financing micro, small and medium enterprises in emerging markets. IFC.
  24. Kiss, A. N., Danis, W. M., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2012). International entrepreneurship research in emerging economies: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 266–290.
  25. Kraus, S., Burtscher, J., Vallaster, C., & Angerer, M. (2018). Sustainable entrepreneurship orientation: A reflection on status-quo research. Journal of Business Research, 89, 59–69.
  26. Kreiser, P. M., Marino, L. D., Kuratko, D. F., & Weaver, K. M. (2013). Disaggregating entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(2), 273–295.
  27. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.
  28. Lumpkin, G. T., Cogliser, C. C., & Schneider, D. R. (2009). Understanding and measuring autonomy. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 47–69.
  29. Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791.
  30. Muleya, F., & Ng’andu, S. (2021). Factors affecting the growth of small and medium enterprises in Zambia. Zambia Journal of Business Studies, 10(2), 45–60.
  31. Mukwalikuli, M., Mwiya, M. S., & Chakwana, P. (2025). The role of micro-finance institutions on financial inclusion of farmpreneurs in rural communities of Kabwe District, Zambia. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 10(10), 3400–3411.
  32. Mukwalikuli, M., Mwiya, M. S., Imasiku, J., Muduli, R., & Mweemba, K. (2026). Indigenous knowledge and entrepreneurial mindset among the Ila-speaking people of Namwala District, Zambia. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 11(1), 3313–3322.
  33. Mwansa, M., Mutale, J., & Chileshe, N. (2019). Small and medium enterprise growth challenges in Zambia. Zambia Social Science Journal, 8(1), 45–60.
  34. Mwiya, M. S., Moose, J., Bbenkele, E., Muduli, R., Mundia, M., & Sikachelela, J. (2025). Entrepreneurial mindset in practice: Manifestations of entrepreneurial orientation among trading SMEs in Kabwe District, Zambia. East African Journal of Management and Business Studies, 5(4), 26–37.
  35. Ndulo, M. (2011). The role of SMEs in Zambia’s economic development. University of Zambia Press.
  36. Neneh, B. N. (2019). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(3), 1–18.
  37. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
  38. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2020). Financing SMEs and entrepreneurs 2020: An OECD scoreboard. OECD Publishing.
  39. Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., Pinkham, B., & Chen, H. (2008). The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(3), 63–81.
  40. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
  41. Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: A meta-analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761–787.
  42. Rogerson, C. M. (2001). In search of the African miracle: Debates on successful small enterprise development in Africa. Habitat International, 25(1), 115–142.
  43. Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 441–457.
  44. Small and Medium Enterprises Development Policy. (2023). Zambia national SME development policy. Government of the Republic of Zambia.
  45. Tang, J., Tang, Z., Marino, L. D., Zhang, Y., & Li, Q. (2008). Exploring an inverted U-shape relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 219–240.
  46. Wales, W. J., Gupta, V. K., & Mousa, F. T. (2013). Empirical research on entrepreneurial orientation. International Small Business Journal, 31(4), 357–383.
  47. Wales, W. J., Kraus, S., Filser, M., Stöckmann, C., & Covin, J. G. (2021). The status quo of EO research. Journal of Business Research, 124, 564–577.
  48. Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge-based resources and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1307–1314.
  49. Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 71–91.
  50. World Bank. (2022). World development report 2022: Finance for an equitable recovery. World Bank.
  51. World Bank Group. (2018). Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) finance. World Bank.
  52. Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper & Row.
  53. Zoogah, D. B., Peng, M. W., & Woldu, H. (2015). Institutions, resources, and entrepreneurship in Africa. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1), 7–31.
  54. Zambia Development Agency (ZDA). (2021). Zambia investment profile and SME development report. ZDA.

This study examines how individual dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation (EO) influence SME performance in an emerging economy context, addressing the unresolved question of which EO dimensions matter, and why. Using data from 262 trading SMEs in Kabwe District, Zambia, the study employs hierarchical multiple regression with HC3 robust standard errors, nonlinear modeling, and Shapley value decomposition to assess both statistical significance and relative importance of EO dimensions. The results show that EO explains a substantial proportion of variance in performance (ΔR² = 0.302). Innovativeness and autonomy emerge as the only statistically significant predictors, while proactiveness, risk-taking, and competitive aggressiveness are not significant in net-effect models. However, relative importance analysis reveals that all EO dimensions contribute meaningfully to explained variance, indicating divergence between coefficient significance and practical importance. Additionally, risk-taking exhibits a significant inverted U-shaped relationship with performance, suggesting optimal rather than linear effects. The study contributes by advancing a multidimensional and context-sensitive understanding of EO, introducing a variance-based analytical approach, and providing empirical evidence from Zambia - an underrepresented context in entrepreneurship research. The findings highlight the need to reconceptualize EO as a system of uneven strategic contributions shaped by institutional and resource constraints.

Keywords : Entrepreneurial Orientation; SME Performance; Variance Decomposition; Emerging Economies; Zambia.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - May - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe