Deep Learning-Based Segmentation for Defect Detection in Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Custom Neural Network Approach


Authors : Gospel Bassey

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 4 - April


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yv6m54an

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25apr2401

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This paper presents an approach to defect detection in metal additive manufacturing using deep learning-based object detection. This is an implementation of a custom neural network architecture with a simplified convolutional backbone to identify and localize defects in manufactured metal components. This model employs dual output heads for bounding box coordinate prediction and defect type identification. An exploration of various optimization strategies including network architecture modifications, training procedure enhancements, and detection quality improvements were done. Experimental results demonstrate that this approach achieves a mean average precision of 0.236 in defect detection, with significantly better performance for workpiece defects compared to nozzle defects. The model generates a fixed set of 100 potential detections per image, with an overall precision of 0.109, recall of 0.128, and F1-score of 0.118. Despite modest performance metrics, the proposed method establishes a baseline approach for automated defect detection in metal additive manufacturing

Keywords : Deep Learning, Object Detection, Metal Additive Manufacturing, Computer Vision, Manufacturing Engineering, Machine Learning, Defect Detection.

References :

  1. L. E. Murr, S. M. Gaytan, D. A. Ramirez, E. Martinez, J. Hernandez, K. N. Amato, P. W. Shindo, F. R. Medina, and R. B. Wicker, "Metal fabrication by additive manufacturing using laser and electron beam melting technologies," Journal of Materials Science & Technology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1-14, January 2012.
  2. J. M. Waller, B. H. Parker, K. L. Hodges, E. R. Burke, and J. L. Walker, "Nondestructive evaluation of additive manufacturing state-of-the-discipline report," NASA/TM-2014-218560, 2014.
  3. H. Gong, K. Rafi, H. Gu, T. Starr, and B. Stucker, "Analysis of defect generation in Ti-6Al-4V parts made using powder bed fusion additive manufacturing processes," Additive Manufacturing, vol. 1, pp. 87-98, 2014.
  4. H. Rieder, A. Dillhöfer, M. Spies, J. Bamberg, and T. Hess, "Online monitoring of additive manufacturing processes using ultrasound," 11th European Conference on Non-Destructive Testing (ECNDT 2014), Prague, Czech Republic, 2016.
  5. S. Kleszczynski, J. Zur Jacobsmühlen, J. T. Sehrt, and G. Witt, "Error detection in laser beam melting systems by high resolution imaging," Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, vol. 975, 2012.
  6. C. Gobert, E. W. Reutzel, J. Petrich, A. R. Nassar, and S. Phoha, "Application of supervised machine learning for defect detection during metallic powder bed fusion additive manufacturing using high resolution imaging," Additive Manufacturing, vol. 21, pp. 517-528, 2018.
  7. L. Scime and J. Beuth, "Anomaly detection and classification in a laser powder bed additive manufacturing process using a trained computer vision algorithm," Additive Manufacturing, vol. 19, pp. 114-126, 2018.
  8. R. Girshick, J. Donahue, T. Darrell, and J. Malik, "Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation," Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 580-587, 2014.
  9. R. Girshick, "Fast r-cnn," Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1440-1449, 2015.
  10. S. Ren, K. He, R. Girshick, and J. Sun, "Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 28, 2015.
  11. J. Redmon, S. Divvala, R. Girshick, and A. Farhadi, "You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection," Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 779-788, 2016.
  12. W. Liu, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, C. Szegedy, S. Reed, C. Y. Fu, and A. C. Berg, "SSD: Single shot multibox detector," European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 21-37, 2016.
  13. M. K. Ferguson, A. Ronay, Y. T. T. Lee, and K. H. Law, "Detection and segmentation of manufacturing defects with convolutional neural networks and transfer learning," Smart and Sustainable Manufacturing Systems, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 137-164, 2018.
  14. X. Zhang, J. Wang, C. Wang, Y. Li, X. Zhou, and C. Liu, "Surface defect detection of steel-strip based on faster R-CNN," Materials, vol. 13, no. 19, 4347, 2020.
  15. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, "Deep residual learning for image recognition," Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 770-778, 2016.
  16. T. Y. Lin, P. Dollár, R. Girshick, K. He, B. Hariharan, and S. Belongie, "Feature pyramid networks for object detection," Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2117-2125, 2017.
  17. 3D-printing, "3D Printing Pictures (Version 6) [Data set]," Roboflow Universe, https://universe.roboflo w.com/3d-printing/3d-printing-pictures/dataset/6, 2021.

This paper presents an approach to defect detection in metal additive manufacturing using deep learning-based object detection. This is an implementation of a custom neural network architecture with a simplified convolutional backbone to identify and localize defects in manufactured metal components. This model employs dual output heads for bounding box coordinate prediction and defect type identification. An exploration of various optimization strategies including network architecture modifications, training procedure enhancements, and detection quality improvements were done. Experimental results demonstrate that this approach achieves a mean average precision of 0.236 in defect detection, with significantly better performance for workpiece defects compared to nozzle defects. The model generates a fixed set of 100 potential detections per image, with an overall precision of 0.109, recall of 0.128, and F1-score of 0.118. Despite modest performance metrics, the proposed method establishes a baseline approach for automated defect detection in metal additive manufacturing

Keywords : Deep Learning, Object Detection, Metal Additive Manufacturing, Computer Vision, Manufacturing Engineering, Machine Learning, Defect Detection.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe