Authors :
Dr. Rebecca Shylla; Dr. Manu Bansal; Dr. Parul Verma; Dr. Deepmala Jogani; Dr. Shubhanki Shrimal; Dr. Akshita Tak
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 11 - November
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/97rctpj7
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/mrxbvtr4
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25nov1174
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Dental cements are indispensable in modern restorative dentistry, playing critical roles in luting, pulp
protection, and cavity lining. Over the decades, continuous innovations have transformed their composition and
functionality, aligning them with evolving clinical demands. This review explores the historical evolution and recent
advances in dental cements, with a focus on enhanced biological activity, improved adhesion, and simplified application
protocols.
Early materials such as zinc phosphate and zinc polycarboxylate cements offered mechanical strength and basic
adhesion. The introduction of glass ionomer cements (GICs) marked a pivotal advancement, combining chemical bonding
with fluoride release. Recent enhancements to GICs, including nanotechnology and incorporation of bioactive fillers like
nano-hydroxyapatite, have significantly improved their mechanical properties and remineralizing potential.
Self-adhesive resin cements (SARCs) represent a breakthrough in adhesive dentistry, enabling efficient clinical
workflows without the need for etching and priming. These cements have demonstrated long-term success in bonding to
various substrates, including ceramics and metal. Simultaneously, the use of bioactive cements such as mineral trioxide
aggregate (MTA) and Biodentine has expanded the scope of vital pulp therapy and endodontics, offering superior sealing
ability, biocompatibility, and regenerative potential. This article compiles current scientific findings and clinical
applications of advanced dental cements.
Keywords :
Dental Cements, Luting Agents, Bioactive Cements, MTA, Biodentine, Biocompatibility, Sealing Ability, Regenerative Potential.
References :
- Anusavice, K. J., Shen, C., & Rawls, H. R. (2012). Phillips' Science of Dental Materials (12th ed.). Elsevier.
- Phillips, R. W. (1991). Skinner's Science of Dental Materials (9th ed.). W.B. Saunders.
- Wilson, A. D., & Kent, B. E. (1971). The glass-ionomer cement: a new translucent dental filling material. British Dental Journal, 132(4), 133–135.
- Smith, D. C. (1968). A new dental cement. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association, 34(6), 250–253.
- Camilleri, J. (2014). Hydraulic calcium silicate cements for dental and endodontic applications. Dental Materials, 30(4), 293–321.
- Ferracane, J. L. (2011). Resin composite—State of the art. Dental Materials, 27(1), 29–38.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.020
- Mount, G. J., & Makinson, O. F. (1998). Calcium hydroxide: Biology and clinical applications. Quintessence International, 29(9), 643–653.
- Wilson, A. D., & Kent, B. E. (1972). A new translucent cement for dentistry: The glass ionomer cement. British Dental Journal, 132(4), 133–135.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802810
- Mitra, S. B. (1991). Adhesion to dentin and physical properties of a light-cured glass ionomer liner/base. Journal of Dental Research, 70(1), 72–74.
- Lohbauer, U. (2010). Dental glass ionomer cements as permanent filling materials? — Properties, limitations and future trends. Materials, 3(2), 76–96.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma3010076
- Hilton, T. J. (2002). Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 14(6), 284–293.
- Mjor, I. A. (1997). Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. Part 4: Dental materials, placement techniques, and pulp. Quintessence International, 28(10), 689–700.
- Attin, T., et al. (2003). Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials—Fluoride release and uptake characteristics. Dental Materials, 19(6), 444–457.
- Pilo, R., et al. (2011). The effect of temperature on resin cement setting time and bond strength. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 106(1), 1–8.
- De Munck, J., et al. (2005). A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue. Journal of Dental Research, 84(2), 118–132.
https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400204
- Makanjuola, J. O., & Deb, S. (2023). Bioactive glass-ionomer cements: A review. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 5(1), 24.
https://www.mdpi.com/2673-1592/5/1/24
- Tanaka, J., et al. (2021). Adhesion and sealing ability of self-adhesive resin cements. Clinical Oral Investigations, 25, 4563–4571.
- Alhamoudi, F. H., et al. (2024). Comparative evaluation of microleakage in different cements. Journal of Dental Sciences, [PMC Article].
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346805/
- Burke, F. J. T., et al. (2005). The use of glass ionomer cements in clinical dentistry. Dental Update, 32(1), 42–48.
- Pameijer, C. H. (2012). A review of luting agents. International Journal of Dentistry, 2012, 1–7.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/752861
- Raghavan, R., et al. (2020). Evaluation of newer bioactive cements in pulpotomy procedures. Journal of Conservative Dentistry, 23(1), 50–54.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7093485/
- Shafiei, F., & Memarpour, M. (2010). Effects of dentin wetness on the bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements. Operative Dentistry, 35(6), 605–612.
- Pilo, R., et al. (2003). Effect of cement thickness on retention of cast crowns. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 89(6), 603–609.
- Sidhu, S. K., & Nicholson, J. W. (2016). A review of glass-ionomer cements for clinical dentistry. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 7(3), 16.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb7030016
- Poggio, C., et al. (2017). Influence of different luting agents on the retentive strength of crowns. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 9(7), e861.
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.53672
- Machry RV, Rocha AT, Ceretta T, Spohr AM.Longevity of metal-ceramic single crowns cemented onto resin composite prosthetic cores with self-adhesive resin cement: Up to 106 months follow-up.
Clinical Oral Investigations. 2023;27(4):1635–1643.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04730-4
- Alvarenga M, Lima R, Braz R, et al.Self-adhesive resin cements versus conventional resin cements on the failure rate of indirect restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Oral Investigations. 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05420-w
- Jalali H, Moradi S, Rahimi S, et al.Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine in pulpotomy of permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis: A randomized controlled trial.
Clinical Oral Investigations. 2023;27(10):5043–5051.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05192-3
- Raghavan R, Ramakrishnan R, Nayar S, et al.Clinical evaluation of Biodentine and light-cured MTA in indirect pulp capping: A randomized controlled trial.
Journal of Conservative Dentistry. 2025;28(2):101–106.
https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_281_24
- Dos Reis KR, de Andrade GS, Rocha AT, et al.Effect of EDTA conditioning on the bond longevity of self-adhesive resin cements in fiber post applications.
Operative Dentistry. 2022;47(6):586–594.
https://doi.org/10.2341/21-029-L
- Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW.A review of glass-ionomer cements for clinical dentistry.
Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2016;7(3):16.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb7030016
- Al-Eesa NA, Joharji RS, Hajeer MY, et al.The effect of incorporating nano-hydroxyapatite into GIC: A systematic review.
Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2021;29:e20210201.
https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0201
- Ushley S, Duncan HF, Lappin MJ, et al.Direct pulp capping with calcium hydroxide, MTA, or Biodentine: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
International Endodontic Journal. 2021;54(4):556–571.
https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13435
Dental cements are indispensable in modern restorative dentistry, playing critical roles in luting, pulp
protection, and cavity lining. Over the decades, continuous innovations have transformed their composition and
functionality, aligning them with evolving clinical demands. This review explores the historical evolution and recent
advances in dental cements, with a focus on enhanced biological activity, improved adhesion, and simplified application
protocols.
Early materials such as zinc phosphate and zinc polycarboxylate cements offered mechanical strength and basic
adhesion. The introduction of glass ionomer cements (GICs) marked a pivotal advancement, combining chemical bonding
with fluoride release. Recent enhancements to GICs, including nanotechnology and incorporation of bioactive fillers like
nano-hydroxyapatite, have significantly improved their mechanical properties and remineralizing potential.
Self-adhesive resin cements (SARCs) represent a breakthrough in adhesive dentistry, enabling efficient clinical
workflows without the need for etching and priming. These cements have demonstrated long-term success in bonding to
various substrates, including ceramics and metal. Simultaneously, the use of bioactive cements such as mineral trioxide
aggregate (MTA) and Biodentine has expanded the scope of vital pulp therapy and endodontics, offering superior sealing
ability, biocompatibility, and regenerative potential. This article compiles current scientific findings and clinical
applications of advanced dental cements.
Keywords :
Dental Cements, Luting Agents, Bioactive Cements, MTA, Biodentine, Biocompatibility, Sealing Ability, Regenerative Potential.