Authors :
Matthew Busayo Olanrewaju; Hazzan Adedapo Aderinko; Cornelius Chukwukjekwu Okafor; Emmanuel Ayodeji Afolabi; Christopher Nwabuwa
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 9 - September
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/3mbwnnnp
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26sep365
Note : A published paper may take 4-5
working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and
ResearchGate.
Abstract :
The rapid global transition toward sustainable transportation requires the mass deployment of Solar-Powered
Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure (SPEVCI). However, the integration of localized photovoltaic arrays, high-capacity
battery storage, and high-voltage charging terminals transforms these installations into highly complex socio-technical
systems. Traditional, deterministic project management methodologies—such as the Critical Path Method (CPM)—rely on
static planning and consistently fail to manage the dynamic supply chain volatility, weather delays, and cross-disciplinary
dependencies inherent to SPEVCI deployment. This paper proposes a novel, hybridized methodology: the Dynamic Lifecycle
and AI-BIM Integration (DLAI) framework. By synthesizing Predictive Agile-AI (PA-AI), AI-Enhanced Systems
Engineering (AESE), and Digital Twin spatial computing, the DLAI framework operates as a continuous, intelligent data
ecosystem. It orchestrates spatial simulation, predictive execution routing, and agile telemetry through an IoT-enabled
centralized feedback loop.
Keywords :
SPEVCI; Project Management; Charging Infrastructure; AI.
References :
- Adewale Wasiu Adegboyega, et al. “Agile Project Management in Smart Grid Design: Comparative Insights From Africa and the United States.” International Journal of Science and Research Archive, vol. 12, no. 2, 30 July 2024, pp. 1411–1419, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382850562_Agile_project_management_in_smart_grid_design_Comparative_insights_from_Africa_and_the_United_States, 10.30574/ijsra.2024.12.2.1397. Accessed 17 Aug. 2026.
- Ahmed, Khubab, et al. “Parameter Estimation of Weibull Distribution Using Constrained Search Space: An Application to Elevator Maintenance.” Machines, vol. 13, no. 11, 6 Nov. 2025, p. 1022, https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1702/13/11/1022, 10.3390/machines13111022. Accessed 5 Sept. 2026.
- Biya, T. S., and M. R. Sindhu. “Design and Power Management of Solar Powered Electric Vehicle Charging Station With Energy Storage System.” 2019 3Rd International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA), June 2019, pp. 815–820, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8821896, 10.1109/iceca.2019.8821896. Accessed 17 Aug. 2026.
- Botsford, Charles, and Adam Szczepanek. “Fast Charging Vs. Slow Charging: Pros and Cons for the New Age of Electric Vehicles.” ResearchGate, unknown, 13 Apr. 2009, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228997158_Fast_Charging_vs_Slow_Charging_Pros_and_cons_for_the_New_Age_of_Electric_Vehicles. Accessed 17 Aug. 2026.
- Ekung, Samuel Bassey. “LIMITATIONS of RISK IDENTIFICATION TOOLS APPLIED in PROJECT MANAGEMENT in the NIGERIAN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY.” Malaysian Construction Research Journal, vol. 30, no. 1, 12 Mar. 2020, pp. 73–85, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351515477_LIMITATIONS_OF_RISK_IDENTIFICATION_TOOLS_APPLIED_IN_PROJECT_MANAGEMENT_IN_THE_NIGERIAN_CONSTRUCTION_INDUSTRY.
- Garg, Rachit, et al. “Potential Use-Cases of Natural Language Processing for a Logistics Organization.” Studies in Computational Intelligence, 2021, pp. 157–191, https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-68291-0_13, 10.1007/978-3-030-68291-0_13. Accessed 17 Aug. 2026.
- Gnann, Till, et al. “Fast Charging Infrastructure for Electric Vehicles: Today’s Situation and Future Needs.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 62, July 2018, pp. 314–329, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920917305643, 10.1016/j.trd.2018.03.004. Accessed 17 Aug. 2026.
- Khan, Saadullah, et al. “A Comprehensive Review on Solar Powered Electric Vehicle Charging System.” Smart Science, Taylor & Francis, 22 Dec. 2017, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23080477.2017.1419054. Accessed 17 Aug. 2026.
- Li, Fengpei, et al. “Prediction-Enhanced Monte Carlo: A Machine Learning View on Control Variate.” arXiv.Org, 2024, https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.11257. Accessed 17 Aug. 2026.
- Liu, Guozhong, et al. “Data-Driven Carbon Footprint Management of Electric Vehicles and Emission Abatement in Electricity Networks.” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 15, no. 1, Jan. 2024, pp. 95–108, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10122732, 10.1109/tste.2023.3274813. Accessed 17 Aug. 2026.
- Mali, Bijen, et al. “Challenges in the Penetration of Electric Vehicles in Developing Countries With a Focus on Nepal.” Renewable Energy Focus, vol. 40, Mar. 2022, pp. 1–12, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755008421000600, 10.1016/j.ref.2021.11.003. Accessed 17 Aug. 2026.
- Mosleuzzaman, Md, et al. “ENGINEERING CHALLENGES and SOLUTIONS in SMART GRID INTEGRATION WITH ELECTRIC VEHICLES.” Academic Journal on Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics Education, vol. 4, no. 3, 9 Sept. 2024, pp. 139–150, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383904911_ENGINEERING_CHALLENGES_AND_SOLUTIONS_IN_SMART_GRID_INTEGRATION_WITH_ELECTRIC_VEHICLES, 10.69593/ajsteme.v4i03.102. Accessed 17 Aug. 2026.
- Munier, Nolberto, and Eloy Hontoria. Uses and Limitations of the AHP Method. Springer Nature, 5 Feb. 2021, https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-60392-2. Accessed 17 Aug. 2026.
- Olanrewaju, Matthew, and Hazzan Adedapo. “State-of-Charge Driven Charging Behaviour at Public EV Chargers in the United Kingdom: An Empirical Study.” SSRN, 23 June 2026, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6872978.
- Olanrewaju, Matthew Busayo, and Hazzan Adedapo Aderinko. “Data-Driven Optimization of Hybrid Solar Photovoltaic (PV) and Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) for Electric Vehicle Charging Using a Hybrid Data Approach.” International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, vol. 11, no. 6, 8 July 2026, p. 2830, https://ideas.repec.org/a/cvr/ijisrt/202606ijisrt26jun1757.html, 10.38124/ijisrt/26jun1757. Accessed 5 Sept. 2026.
- Pevec, Dario, et al. “Electric Vehicle Range Anxiety: An Obstacle for the Personal Transportation (R)Evolution?” 2019 4Th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies (SpliTech), June 2019, pp. 1–8, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8783178, 10.23919/splitech.2019.8783178. Accessed 17 Aug. 2026.
- Rainieri, Giuseppe, et al. “The Psychological, Human Factors and Socio-Technical Contribution: A Systematic Review Towards Range Anxiety of Battery Electric Vehicles” Drivers.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, vol. 99, Nov. 2023, pp. 52–70, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847823002012, 10.1016/j.trf.2023.10.001. Accessed 17 Aug. 2026.
- Rajabi Asadabadi, Mehdi, et al. “Are MCDM Methods Useful? A Critical Review of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Analytic Network Process (ANP).” Cogent Engineering, Taylor & Francis, 31 May 2019, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311916.2019.1623153#abstract. Accessed 17 Aug. 2026.
- Rani, Hafnidar A., et al. “Risk Management Planning by Risk Register in Building Construction Project.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 1303, no. 1, 1 Feb. 2024, p. 012034, https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/1303/1/012034/meta, 10.1088/1755-1315/1303/1/012034. Accessed 17 Aug. 2026.
- Rao, Rao, et al. “A Systematical Framework of Schedule Risk Management for Power Grid Engineering Projects” Sustainable Development.” Sustainability, vol. 6, no. 10, 1 Oct. 2014, pp. 6872–6901, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277673822_A_Systematical_Framework_of_Schedule_Risk_Management_for_Power_Grid_Engineering_Projects’_Sustainable_Development, 10.3390/su6106872. Accessed 17 Aug. 2026.
- Razmjoo, Armin, et al. “A Comprehensive Study on the Expansion of Electric Vehicles in Europe.” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 22, 16 Nov. 2022, p. 11656, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365467916_A_Comprehensive_Study_on_the_Expansion_of_Electric_Vehicles_in_Europe, 10.3390/app122211656. Accessed 17 Aug. 2026.
- Rumelhart, David E., et al. “Learning Representations by Back-Propagating Errors.” Nature, vol. 323, no. 6088, Oct. 1986, pp. 533–536, https://www.nature.com/articles/323533a0, 10.1038/323533a0. Accessed 17 Aug. 2026.
- Saaty, Thomas L. “How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process.” Interfaces, vol. 24, no. 6, Dec. 1994, pp. 19–43, https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/inte.24.6.19, 10.1287/inte.24.6.19. Accessed 17 Aug. 2026.
- Salim Afhayma and Mohamed I Youssef. “The Future of Project Scheduling: Leveraging Machine Learning for Precision Planning.” International Journal of Humanities and Information Technology, vol. 7, no. 03, 2025, https://ijhit.info/index.php/ijhit/article/view/75. Accessed 17 Aug. 2026.
- Shaaban, Mohamed, et al. “A Generative AI–Enhanced Framework for Smart Sustainable Electrical Networks.” 2026 IEEE 5Th International Multidisciplinary Conference on Engineering Technology (IMCET), 15 Apr. 2026, pp. 1–6, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/11503694, 10.1109/imcet69180.2026.11503694. Accessed 17 Aug. 2026.
- “The Beta-PERT Distribution | RiskAMP.” Riskamp.Com, 2026, https://www.riskamp.com/beta-pert/. Accessed 5 Sept. 2026.
- Yousuf, A. K. M., et al. “An In-Depth Exploration of Electric Vehicle Charging Station Infrastructure: A Comprehensive Review of Challenges, Mitigation Approaches, and Optimization Strategies.” IEEE Access, vol. 12, 2024, pp. 51570–51589, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10494325, 10.1109/access.2024.3385731. Accessed 17 Aug. 2026.
- Zentani, Ahmed, et al. “A Comprehensive Review of Developments in Electric Vehicles Fast Charging Technology.” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 11, 30 May 2024, p. 4728, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381031933_A_Comprehensive_Review_of_Developments_in_Electric_Vehicles_Fast_Charging_Technology, 10.3390/app14114728. Accessed 17 Aug. 2026.
- Zhou, Mo, et al. “Strengthening Power Grid Projects” Governance and Sustainability Through Lifecycle Auditing.” Scientific Reports, vol. 15, no. 1, 17 Oct. 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12534621/, 10.1038/s41598-025-20389-9. Accessed 17 Aug. 2026.
- Zhuang, Liu, et al. “A ConvNet for the 2020S.” arXiv.Org, 2020, https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.03545. Accessed 17 Aug. 2026.
The rapid global transition toward sustainable transportation requires the mass deployment of Solar-Powered
Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure (SPEVCI). However, the integration of localized photovoltaic arrays, high-capacity
battery storage, and high-voltage charging terminals transforms these installations into highly complex socio-technical
systems. Traditional, deterministic project management methodologies—such as the Critical Path Method (CPM)—rely on
static planning and consistently fail to manage the dynamic supply chain volatility, weather delays, and cross-disciplinary
dependencies inherent to SPEVCI deployment. This paper proposes a novel, hybridized methodology: the Dynamic Lifecycle
and AI-BIM Integration (DLAI) framework. By synthesizing Predictive Agile-AI (PA-AI), AI-Enhanced Systems
Engineering (AESE), and Digital Twin spatial computing, the DLAI framework operates as a continuous, intelligent data
ecosystem. It orchestrates spatial simulation, predictive execution routing, and agile telemetry through an IoT-enabled
centralized feedback loop.
Keywords :
SPEVCI; Project Management; Charging Infrastructure; AI.