Authors : Kpoje Chukwudi; Otaraku Ipeghan; Peter Muwarure

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 4 - April

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/knrday7v

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2u3nnzk6

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25apr1860

Google Scholar

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.

Abstract : This study focuses on designing and evaluating a process plant for liquefied natural gas (LNG) boil-off gas (BOG) recovery. The lightest hydrocarbons included in LNG, such as methane and ethane, are often included in Boil-off Gas (BOG). Flaring and contamination of the environment are unavoidable in the absence of an effective BOG recovery system. Using Aspen HYSYS, a natural gas liquefaction process was simulated, emphasizing the recovery and utilization of BOG generated during various stages of LNG processing, including liquefaction, depressurization, storage, and shipping. The material and energy balances for the process were meticulously calculated to ensure accuracy in flow rates and heat exchange efficiencies. The simulation results indicate that the liquefied natural gas produced contains a methane 2473oncentrationn of 96.64% with minor amounts of ethane. BOG, mainly consisting of methane (100% purity), was effectively recovered and conditioned for reuse or flaring. An economic analysis was conducted to assess the profitability of BOG recovery, highlighting an estimated annual income of $138,121,200, with a gross profit margin of 97.3%. The total capital investment required for BOG recovery equipment amounted to $3,790,605. This study demonstrates that BOG recovery can significantly enhance the economic viability and environmental sustainability of LNG operations by reducing methane emissions and providing a valuable energy resource.

Keywords : Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG); LNG Process Plant; Boil-Off Gas (BOG); BOG Recovery; Economic Analysis; Environmental Sustainability.

References :

1. Litvinenko, V. (2020) 'The role of hydrocarbons in the global Energy Agenda: the focus on liquefied natural gas,' Resources, 9(5), p. 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9050059.
2. Cherepovitsyn, A. and Evseeva, O. (2020) 'Parameters of sustainable development: case of Arctic liquefied natural gas projects,' Resources, 10(1), p. 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10010001.
3. Pachauri, R. K., Allen, M. R., Barros, V. R., Broome, J., Cramer, W., Christ, R., ... & van Ypserle, J. P. (2014). Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (p. 151). Ipcc. https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/37530/
4. Khan, M.S. et al. (2020) 'Energy Saving through Efficient BOG Prediction and Impact of Static Boil-off-Rate in Full Containment-Type LNG Storage Tank,' Energies, 13(21), p. 5578. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13215578.
5. Marketos, T., Mazzucchi, N. and Alexopoulos, T.A. (2022) Geostrategic alliances in the Eastern Mediterranean and MENA, SpringerBriefs in international relations. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97593-7.
6. Muwarure, P., Otaraku, I. and Iriakuma, E. (2023) Simulation of the Recovery of Boil-Off Gas at LNG Storage Section and Exporting Terminals. Global Journal of Engineering Science and Research Management. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368984042