Authors : Cathlea N. Tongco

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 10 - October

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2vky3fwm

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3xyv3hzx

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25oct206

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : This study aimed to design, develop, and validate Kalinangan at Isipang Lokal sa Asignaturang Pisika Interactive Video Vignettes (KISLAP IVVs) as contextualized learning guides for Grade 9 Physics. Grounded in constructivist and multimedia learning theories, KISLAP IVVs were created to enhance students’ understanding of physics concepts by integrating local culture and interactive digital technology. The study followed Borg and Gall’s research and development model, incorporating expert validations and iterative revisions. Eight IVVs were developed, each targeting a specific Most Essential Learning Competency (MELC) in Physics, such as projectile motion, momentum, mechanical energy, and heat engines. The contextualization of lessons using familiar local scenarios aimed to make abstract concepts more relatable and meaningful. Pre and post-tests were administered to assess student learning gains, while validation instruments evaluated the IVVs’ content, context, interactivity, and applicability. Results revealed that KISLAP IVVs significantly improved students’ conceptual understanding and were deemed effective, efficient, and usable by both experts and learners. This project contributes to the pool of localized instructional materials and offers a pedagogically sound and culturally responsive tool for teaching Physics, aligned with the Department of Education’s goals for 21st-century, learner-centered education.

Keywords : KISLAP IVVs, Interactive Video Vignettes, Contextualized Physics Instruction.

References :

1. Abayao, L. E. (2010, May 7). Ifugao Knowledge and Formal Education -Systems of Learning in the Philippines. Cultural Survival. https://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/ifugao- knowledge-and-formal-education-systems-learning
2. Adelana, O. P. (2021). Development and validation of instructional package for teaching and learning of genetics in secondary schools. ejournal.upsi.edu.my. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajatel.vol11.2.4.2021
3. Agum, A. N. C. (2020b). Mobile textula: a possible new way of reawakening the marginalized Philippine poetry. Abstract Proceedings International Scholars Conference, 7(1), 2150–2163. https://doi.org/10.35974/isc.v7i1.885
4. Alenizi, M.A. (2019). Effectiveness of a Program Based on A Multi-Sensory Strategy in Developing Visual Perception of Primary School Learners with Learning Disabilities: A Contextual Study of Arabic Learners. International Journal of Educational Psychology,8(1),72-104.doi: 10.17583/ijep.2019.3346 http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2019.3346
5. Andrews, D., Van Lieshout, E., & Kaudal, B. B. (2023). How, where, and when do students experience meaningful learning? International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.30722/ijisme.31.03.003
6. Angga, N. M., Phieranto, C. C., Teio, F., Yovan, D., Angelica, A., & Putri, F. S. (2022). Chunk Learning Media for cognitive load optimization on science learning. 2022 Seventh International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC). https://doi.org/10.1109/icic56845.2022.10006912
7. Arif, S. A., Cryder, B. T., Mazan, J. L., Quiñones-Boex, A. C., & Cyganska, A. (2017). Using patient case video vignettes to improve students’ understanding of cross- cultural communication. The American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 81(3), 56. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe81356
8. Aslan, F., & Büyük, U. (2021). Misconceptions in projectile motion and conceptual changes via geogebra applications. European Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(3), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.19044/ejes.v8no3a42
9. Asysyura, F., Adnan, A., & Faisal, F. (2023). The effect of interactive multimedia on students’ cognitive learning outcomes on system materials. Biodidaktika: Jurnal Biologi            Dan        Pembelajarannya, 18(1),     9. https://doi.org/10.30870/biodidaktika.v18i1.17808
10. Briška, I. ., & Siliņa-Jasjukeviča, G. (2020). Promoting the Cultural Understanding of a Student in a General Education School: Teachers’ Experiences and Challenges. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia, 45, 30-41. https://doi.org/10.15388/ActPaed.45.2
11. Cardinale, J. A., Newman, D. L., & Wright, L. K. (2020). An Online Interactive Video Vignette that Helps Students Learn Key Concepts of Fermentation and Respiration. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v21i2.1895
12. Carstens, K., Mallon, J., Bataineh, M., Bataineh, A., (2021). Effects of Technology on Student Learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology January 2021, Volume 20 Issue 1. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1290791.pdf
13. Carstens, R., Pelgrum, W. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2021). Teaching and learning with technology: Evidence from the IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77001-7
14. Chi, C. (2023, January 30). Duterte: K-12 students ready for work right after graduation “still a promise.” Philstar.com. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2023/01/30/2241367/duterte-k-12-students-ready-work-right-after-graduation-still-promise
15. Clark, R. C., Mayer, R. E., & Thalheimer, W. (2003). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 41–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4930420510
16. CMO                         No.          76           s.             2017,      Commission         on           Higher    Education,            Philippines. https://chedro1.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/CMO-No.-76-s.-2017.pdf
17. Cruz, K. J. G. D. (2022). Historical vignettes: An approach to bring back students interest in science. Animo Repository. https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etdm_scied/27/
18. Del Carmen, M. V. C. (2018). Effects of historical physics vignettes on student’s understanding on the nature of science and epistemological beliefs toward learning physics. Animo                Repository. https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/5539/
19. DepEd Order No.24, s. 2022. Retrieved from: https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp- content/uploads/2022/05/DO_s2022_024.pdf
20. Design Thinking      101. (n.d.). Nielsen              Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/design-thinking/
21. DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
22. Dialde, F. C. (2023). A Tracer’s study on senior high school graduates of state university. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology, 951–958. https://doi.org/10.48175/ijarsct-12397
23. Djamas, D., Tinedi, V., & Yohandri. (2021). Development of interactive multimedia learning materials for improving critical thinking skills. In IGI Global eBooks (pp. 507–525). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3022-1.ch026
24. Djamas, D., Afrinaldi, R., & Ardi, Z. (2021). The Development of Interactive Multimedia-Based Physics Learning Tools to Foster Students' Independent Learning and Critical Thinking Skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1876(1), 012073. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1876/1/012073
25. Engelman, J., & Koenig, K. (2018). Changing student conceptions of Newton’s laws using interactive video vignettes. 2017 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2017.pr.026
26. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
27. General Shaping Paper 2023. MATATAG Curriculum. Department of Education. Philippines. https://www.deped.gov.ph/matatag-curriculum/general-shaping- paper-2023/
28. Gibbons, Sarah. (2016) Design Thinking 101. Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/design-thinking/
29. Guiao, C. D., & Caballes, D. G. (2023). Teachers’ perception on integrating historical vignettes in teaching science concepts. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 8(1), ISSN  No:-2456-2165. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368898772_Teachers'_Perception_on_Integrating_Historical_Vignettes_in_Teaching_Science_Concepts
30. Guntur, M. I. S., Setyaningrum, W., Retnawati, H., & Marsigit, M. (2020). Assessing the Potential of Augmented Reality in Education. In Proceedings of the 2020 11th International Conference on E-Education, EBusiness, E-Management, and E- Learning. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377571.3377621
31. Gustiani, Sri (2019) Research and Development (R&D) Method as a Model Deign in Educational Research and Its Alternatives. Holistic Journal., Volume 11, Number 2, December 2019, p-ISSN 2085-4021 │e-ISSN 2657-1897
32. Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022b). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
33. Harris, C. J. (2016). The effective integration of technology into schools’ curriculum. Blog Spot for Instructional Technology. https://courtneysblogpage.wordpress.com/2016/10/20/the-effective-integration-of- technology-into-schools-curriculum/
34. Hull, D (1985). Who are you calling stupid? The Revolution that’s Changing Education Waco, Tex. : Cord Communications
35. Imad M. (2022). Teaching to Empower: Leveraging the Neuroscience of Now to Help Students Become Self-Regulated Learners. Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, 20(2), A254–A262. https://doi.org/10.59390/WTLQ2344
36. Jimenez, E. C. (2020). Contextualized E-Learning Resource: A Tool for Stronger Academic Platform. International Journal of Case Studies in Business, IT, and Education (IJCSBE), 4(2), 110-116. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4018344.
37. Kapıcı, H. Ö., Akçay, H., & De Jong, T. (2020). How do different laboratory environments influence students’ attitudes toward science courses and laboratories? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(4), 534–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1750075
38. Kapici, H. Ö., Akçay, H., & de Jong, T. (2020). Using Hands-On and Virtual Laboratories Alone or Together—Which Works Better for Acquiring Knowledge and Skills?. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29, 654–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09830-8
39. Kokoç, M. (2019). Flexibility in e-Learning: Modelling its relation to behavioural engagement and academic performance. Themes in eLearning, 12, 1-16. http://earthlab.uoi.gr/tel
40. Kretchmar, J. (2019a). Constructivism. Salem press encyclopedia. EBSCO.
41. Lave, J. (2015). Situated learning or situated cognition is a learning theory developed in the late 1980s by. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Situated-learning-or-situated-cognition-is-a-theory-Lave- Wenger/4653edad5611c 984ff7bc5c166b3729c0db1ecc1
42. Laws, P. W., Willis, M. C., Jackson, D., Koenig, K., & Teese, R. B. (2015). Using Research-Based interactive video vignettes to enhance Out-of-Class learning in introductory physics. The Physics Teacher, 53(2), 114–117. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4905816
43. Liu, G., & Fang, N. (2017). Student misconceptions of work and energy in engineering dynamics. Presented in 2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313558250_Student_ Misconceptions_of_Work_and_Energy_in_Engineering_Dynamics
44. Llagas, A.T., Corpuz, B, and Bilbao, P. (2016) Becoming a 21st century educational leader/ A. Quezon City : Lorimar Publishing, Inc., c2016
45. Lorbis, J.C. C. (2019). Utilization of Contextualized Teaching and Learning (CTL) Approach in Grade Two Araling Panlipunan [Unpubished Masteral Thesis] Southern Luzon State University
46. Magulod, G.C. (2017). Evaluation of Multisensory Instructional Material Package for Elementary Learners. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, Vol. 5, No. 4, November 2017 E-ISSN 2350-8442 https://www.apjmr.com/wp- content/uploads/2017/11/APJMR-2017.5.4.10.pdf
47. Mayer, R. E. (1999). Research-based principles for the design of instructional messages: The case of multimedia explanations. Document Design, 1, 7-20.
48. Mayer, R. E. (2003). Elements of a science of e-learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research ,29(3), 297-313.
49. Mayer, R. E. (2005a). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. InR.E. Mayer (Ed.), Mayer, R. E. (2005b). Introduction to multimedia learning. The Cambridge Handbook ofMultimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50. Mayer, R. E. (2005c). Principles for managing essential processing in multimedia learning: Segmenting, pretraining, and modality principles. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
51. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1),         43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
52. Mayer, R.E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist , 59, 14-19.
53. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
54. Moellenberg KK, Aldridge M. (2017) Sliding away from PowerPoint: the interactive lecture. Nurse Educ. 2010 Nov-Dec;35(6):268-72. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e3181f7f2f7. PMID: 20975416.
55. Morales, M. (2014). Cultural and epistemological profile of Filipino learners. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 18 (6).
56. Morales, M. (2014). Culture and language sensitive physics on student concept attainment. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 6 (1), 1-12.
57. Morales, M. (2014). The impact of culture and language sensitive physics on concept attainment. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research 2 (1), 1-29.
58. Morin, Amanda (n.d.) What is multisensory instruction? https://www.understood.org/en/articles/multisensory-instruction-what-you-need- to-know
59. Most Essential Learning Competencies. Department of Education. Philippines https://lrmds.deped.gov.ph/detail/18275
60. Movilla, S. D. (2022). Enhancing the teaching of astronomy by integrating online interactive historical video vignettes. Animo Repository. https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etdm_scied/32/
61. Murad, D.F., Irsan, M., Akhirianto, P.M., Fernando, E., Murad, S.A., & Hendra Wijaya,M. (2019). Learning Support System using Chatbot in "Kejar C Package" Homeschooling Program. 2019 International Conference on Information and Communications Technology (ICOIACT), 32-37.
62. Ng, Y. F. (2019). Pedagogy and Innovation in Science Education: A case study of an Experiential Learning Science Undergraduate course. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Pedagogy-and-Innovation-in-Science- Education%3A-A-of-Ng-Chan/e15f4765019be7f56cea4bca80dffe4cb7157ffa
63. Orozco, L. R., & Pasia, A. E. (2021). Enhancing students' higher-order thinking skills through contextualization of a sociocultural mathematics teaching. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal. https://www.academia.edu/49111935/ENHANCING_STUDENTS_HIGHER_ORDER_THINKING_SKILLS_THROUGH_CONTEXTUALIZATION_OF_A_SOCIOCULTURAL_MATHEMATICS_TEACHING
64. Renga, I.P. (2022). Situated Learning Within Practice, Culture, and Community: Jean Lave’s Political Project. In: Geier, B.A. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Educational Thinkers . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81037-5_216-1
65. Reyes, J. F., Insorio, A. O., Ingreso, M. L. V., Hilario, F. F., & Gutierrez, C. R. (2019). Conception and Application of contextualization in Mathematics Education. International Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 6(1), 1–18. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/664590
66. Robles, A. C. M. O., & Acedo, E. M. (2019). Development and validation of educational video tutorials for 21st-century secondary learners. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Vol. 2, No. 2, (2019) (P) ISSN 2651-6691 (E) ISSN 2651-6705 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337307421_Development_and_Validation_of_Educational_Video_ Tutorials_for_21st_Century_Secondary_Learners#full-text
67. Rostan, N. N. A., Ismail, H., Jaafar, A.N.M., (2020) The Use of Multisensory Technique in the Teaching Open Syllables Reading Skill for Preschoolers from a Teacher’s Perspective. Southeast Asia Early Childhood Journal, Vol. 9 (2), 2020 (155-165) ISSN 2289-3156 /eISSN 2550-1763 http://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/SAECJ
68. Salinas, I. (n.d.). Energy Potential A Guide for Teaching Energy in Grades 3 to 8. National Geographic Society. https://media.nationalgeographic.org/assets/file/energy- teacher-guide-ch5.pdf
69. Santiago Jr., C. S., Ulanday, M.L.P., Centeno, Z.J.R., Bayla, M.C.D., & Callanta, J.S. (2021) Flexible Learning Adaptabilities in the New Normal: E-Learning Resources, Digital Meeting Platforms, Online Learning Systems and Learning Engagement Asian Journal of Distance Education Volume 16, Issue 2, 2021 https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1332615.pdf
70. Self, B. P., Miller, R., Kean, A. J., Moore, T. J., Ogletree, T., & Schreiber, F. A. (2008). Important student misconceptions in mechanics and thermal science: Identification using Model-Eliciting Activities. 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/fie.2008.4720595
71. Sharma, S. (2020). Secondary pre-service teachers’ experiences of integrating statistical investigations in their curriculum areas. IASE 2020 Roundtable Paper – Refereed. https://doi.org/10.52041/srap.20603
72. Soriano, J., & Vargas, D. (2021). Adequacy of Instructional Materials and Facilities for the Implementation of K-12 Basic Education Program. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3813237
73. Suryawati, E., & Osman, K. (2018). Contextual Learning: Innovative Approach towards the Development of Students’ Scientific Attitude and Natural Science Performance. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 61-76. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79329
74. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
75. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
76. The Use of Multisensory Technique in the Teaching Open Syllables Reading Skill for Preschoolers from a Teacher's Perspective Southeast Asia Early Childhood, v9 n2 p155-165 2020 https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1288817
77. Teese, R. B., Koenig, K., & Jackson, D. (2020). Interactive video vignettes for teaching science. In Springer eBooks (pp. 669–682). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030- 33600-4_41
78. The effective integration of technology into schools’ curriculum. - Free Online Library. (n.d.).
79. https://www.thefreelibrary.com/The+effective+integration+of+technology+into+s chools%27+curriculum.-a0464244292
80. Trance, N. J. C., & Trance, L. a. M. L. (2019). Embracing the K-12 Curriculum: Accounts of Philippine teachers and students. Journal of Physics, 1254(1), 012031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1254/1/012031
81. Triyani, G., Danawan, A., Suyana, I., & Kaniawati, I. (2019). An investigation of students’ misconceptions about momentum and impulse through interactive conceptual Instruction (ICI) with computer simulation. Journal of Physics, 1280(5), 052008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/5/052008
82. Topolovcan, Tomislav; Matijevic, Milan (2017) Critical Thinking as a Dimension of Constructivist Learning: Some of the Characteristics of Students of Lower Secondary Education in Croatia. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, v7 n3 p47-66 2017
83. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
84. Wang, L. (2023). Research on the “Three Steps and Three Transformations” teaching method based on modern information technology. (2023). Frontiers in Educational Research, 6(24). https://doi.org/10.25236/fer.2023.062417
85. Westlake, S. (2019, July 12). Cognitive Load Theory and multimedia. Pressbooks. https://pressbooks.pub/techandcurr2019/chapter/cognitive-load/
86. Wright, L. K., Newman, D.L., Cardinale, J., Teese, R. (2016). Web-Based interactive video vignettes create a personalized active learning classroom for introducing big ideas in introductory biology. The Journal Of College Biology Teaching Corpus ID: 217908313 http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1126351.pdf
87. Zulkifli, Z., Satria, E., Supriyadi, A., & Santosa, T. A. (2022). Meta-analysis: The effectiveness of the integrated STEM technology pedagogical content knowledge learning model on the 21st century skills of high school students in the science department. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research, 5(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.33292/petier.v5i1.144