Authors : Nikki Jane B. Toyongan

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 6 - June

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/bde88w58

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/yx5ebzyy

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN1943

Abstract : In this qualitative phenomenological investigation, the experiences, coping strategies, and educational perspectives of eight elementary school teachers in Caraga North District, Division of Davao Oriental were explored as they foster digital fluency in early education. Identified themes from their experiences included difficulty in acquiring digital equipment, balanced screen time, and cultivated curiosity and exploration. Coping mechanisms employed by teachers involved enhancing digital skills, establishing partnership with the digital expert, and attending professional development and training. Educational insights encompassed tailoring an age-appropriate technology integration, fostering digital citizenship, and enhancing critical thinking skills. These findings underscore the diverse experiences and competencies required by teachers in imparting relevant digital knowledge to learners. Additionally, delving into teachers' experiences not only contributes to a nuanced comprehension of modern teaching demands but also offers valuable insights for both educators and educational institutions, potentially leading to enhancements in classroom management and teaching strategies in early education.

Keywords : Digital Fluency, Early Education, Elementary School Teachers, Davao City, Philippines.

References :

1. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice Hall.
3. Bartlett, J. & Miller, C. (2011). Truth, lies and the internet a report into young people’s digital fluency.
4. Beetham, H (2015). Deepening digital know-how: building digital talent Key issues in framing the
5. Belshaw, D. (2011). What is ‘digital literacy’? A Pragmatic Investigation. Durham University.
6. Chen, L., Smith, J., & Miller, K. (2020). Digital Fluency and Critical Thinking: Navigating Ethical Engagement with Online Information.
7. Chen, Y., & Anderson, C. A. (2019). Integrating mobile technology into early childhood curriculum. In Mobile technology and its applications in learning (pp. 141-160). IGI Global.
8. Ching, Y. H., Chen, N. S., & Lin, C. P. (2015). Examining the interactive effects of microblogging and interest-focused activities on students’ learning of a science topic. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(2), 157-175.
9. Clark, A., & Carter, E. (2019). Funding Challenges in Integrating Technology in Education: Perspectives from Educators.
10. Creswell, J. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications
11. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
12. Department of Education. (2019). Digital Citizenship Curriculum Guide. Manila, Philippines. digital capabilities of staff in UK HE and FE, Bristol: JISC.
13. Foster & Newman, (2005) “Going going.....” Why are Males Under represented in Pre-Service Primary Education Courses at University.
14. Gasson, S. (2004). Rigor in grounded theory research: An interpretive perspective on generating theory from qualitative field studies. In M. E. Whitman & A. B. Woszczynski (Eds.), The handbook of information systems research (pp. 79–102). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
15. Giorgi, Amadeo (2007) Concerning the phenomenological methods of Husserl and Heidegger and their application in psychology. http://www.cirp.uqam.ca/documents%20pdf/Collection%20vol.%20
16. Gomez, R., Johnson, M., & Martinez, C. (2020). Bridging the Digital Divide: Strategies for Equitable Access to Technology in Education.
17. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N.      K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Johnson, E., & Lee, M. (2020). Empowering Responsible Digital Citizens: The Role of Early Digital Fluency Education.
19. Kabali, H. K., Irigoyen, M. M., Nunez-Davis, R., Budacki, J. G., Mohanty, S. H., Leister, K. P., & Bonner, R. L. (2015). Exposure and use of mobile media devices by young children. Pediatrics, 136(6), 1044-1050.
20. Kalof and Dietz (2008), Essentials of social research. McGraw-Hill Education, 1 Oct 2008 - Social Science
21. Knowles, M. S. (1984). Andragogy in action: Applying modern principles of adult education. Jossey-Bass.
22. Kultusministerkonferenz. (2016). KMK-Empfehlungen zur Bildung in der digitalen Welt [Recommendations on Education in the Digital World]. Berlin, Germany.
23. Lamb, A., Akmal, T., Smith, J., & Tillman, D. (2011). Bridging the Gap: Technology Trends and Use of Technology in Schools. In The New Landscape of Mobile Learning (pp. 1-20). Springer.
24. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.
25. Lin, C. P., & Chai, C. S. (2021). Factors influencing primary school teachers' adoption of technology integration education: A Taiwan case study. Computers & Education, 162, 104070.
26. Lin, C. P., Tsai, M. J., & Chai, C. S. (2020). Developing a Technology Integration Education Program for Elementary School Teachers: A Design-Based Research. Computers & Education, 157, 103987.
27. Manzano, V. G. (2018). Integrating Digital Citizenship Education in the K-12 Curriculum of the Philippines. International Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 2(2), 114-122.
28. Martin, D., & Robinson, L. (2018). Creative Solutions for Technology Integration: Overcoming Resource Constraints in the Classroom.
29. Maxwell, Joseph Alex (2013), Qualitative research design : an interactive approach  J.A. Maxwell.
30. Ministerium für Kultus, Jugend und Sport Baden-Württemberg. (2016). Bildungsplan Grundschule [Primary School Education Plan]. Stuttgart, Germany.
31. Ministry of Education and Training. (2018). General Education Program: Primary Education. Hanoi, Vietnam.
32. Ministry of Education and Training. (2020). National Digital Literacy Framework. Hanoi, Vietnam.
33. Ministry of Education, Taiwan. (2018). Information Education Curriculum Guidelines for Elementary and Junior High School. Taipei City, Taiwan.
34. Ministry of Education, Taiwan. (2019). Digital Citizenship Education Guidelines. Taipei City, Taiwan.
35. Ministry of Education, Taiwan. (2019). Digital Integration in Elementary Education: Enhancing Learning Through Technology.
36. Morrissey & Higgs, (2006), Phenomenological research and adolescent female sexuality: discoveries and applications
37. Moustakas, (1995) Phenomenological research methods.
38. Neuß, N., & Richter, C. (2021). Handreichung für die mediendidaktische Qualifizierung von Lehrenden: Das Modell „MedienkompetenzPLUS“ [Guidelines for Media Didactic Qualification of Teachers: The Model "Media Competence PLUS"]. Medien in der Wissenschaft, 1, 87-101.
39. Neuß, N., & Richter, C. (2021). Transformative Professional Development for Integrating Technology in Education.
40. Nguyen, V. T., & Le, N. T. (2019). Fostering digital literacy and global citizenship through technology integration in education: A case study of Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 28.
41. Patton, Michael (2000) Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: a personal, experiential perspective. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1473325002001003636
42. Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. International Universities Press.
43. Piaget, J. (1967). Logique et connaissance scientifique. Encyclopédie de la Pléiade.
44. Professional Educators' Association. (2022). Empowering Educators in the Digital Era: Professional Development for Technological Integration.
45. Professional Regulation Commission. (2017). Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers. Manila, Philippines.
46. Radesky, J. S., Schumacher, J., & Zuckerman, B. (2016). Mobile and interactive media use by young children: The good, the bad, and the unknown. Pediatrics, 138(5), e20162593.
47. Ribble, M. (2015). Digital citizenship in schools: Nine elements all students should know (3rd ed.). International Society for Technology in Education.
48. Smith, A. (2022). Digital Fluency in Early Education: Navigating the Path to 21st-Century Competence.
49. Stanage, S. M. (2017). Adult education and phenomenological research: New directions      for theory, practice and research. Malabar, FL: Robert E. Krieger.
50. Tran, H. T., & Hoang, D. (2020). Digital transformation in Vietnam: Current status, opportunities, and challenges. Sustainability, 12(18), 7543.
51. Truong, H. M., Le, T. H., & Nguyen, D. Q. (2021). Teachers’ readiness and willingness for integrating ICT in education: A study in Vietnam. Heliyon, 7(2), e06210.
52. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
53. Weinberger, A., Kopp, B., Schwanewedel, J., & Ertelt, B. J. (2019). Kindergarten and elementary school teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and practices regarding fostering young children’s digital skills. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(8), 1940-1964.
54. Williams, R., & Brown, S. (2018). Enhancing Learning Environments with Digital Tools: A Case for Interactive Engagement.