Authors : Gina Indriany Iskandar

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 4 - April

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2uhw8cjw

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/26hf7dmb

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24APR1845

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This research examined differences in the quality of work life for production and marketing employees. Quality of Work Life (QWL) is a general system and concept that connects the potential of human resources in an organization as a leader's effort to meet the needs of members and the organization continuously. Quality of work life is a significant issue that deserves organizational attention. Production employees work in a company and are responsible for making or producing production goods to be sold for salary or wages. Marketing employees are people whose job is to plan, set prices, promote, and distribute products, services, and ideas that can satisfy market desires to achieve organizational goals. The research method used was quantitative, with a sample of 80 respondents. Data collection was carried out using the quality of work life scale. The research results show no difference in the quality of work life between production and marketing employees. The research results also show that the quality of work life for production and marketing employees is medium.

Keywords : Quality of Work Life (QWL), Production Employees, Marketing Employees.

References :

1. Adawiyah, W., & Sukmawati, A. (2013). Analisis beban kerja sumber daya manusia dalam aktivitas produksi komoditi sayuran selada (studi kasus: CV. Spirit Wira Utama). Jurnal Manajemen & Organisasi, 4 (2), 135.
2. Arifin, N. (2012). Analisis kualitas kehidupan kerja, kinerja, dan kepuasan kerja       pada CV. Duta Senenan Jepara. Journal Economia, 8 (1), 1-14.
3. Ariyanto. (2005). Perancangan sistem komputerisasi penjualan pada perusahaan kain batik MDS dengan menggunakan microsoft visual basic 6.0. Penelitian Ilmiah Diterbitkan. Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Informatika & Komputer, Jakarta.
4. Aryansah, I. & Kusumaputri, E.S. (2013). Iklim organisasi dan kualitas kehidupan kerja karyawan. Jurnal Humanitas, 10 (1), 76-86.
5. Fadzilah, A. (2006). Analisis pengaruh pemberdayaan karyawan dan self of efficacy terhadap kinerja karyawan bagian penjualan (studi kasus pada       PT. Sinar Sosro Wilayah Pemasaran Semarang). Jurnal Studi Manajemen & Organisasi, 3 (1), 12.
6. Helmiatin. (2013). Implementasi kualitas kehidupan kerja (quality of work life) dalam mempertahankan karyawan dan meningkatkan produktivitas. Jurnal Ekonomi, Universitas Terbuka.
7. Herzberg, F. (1996). The motivation to work. John Willey and Sons, New York.
8. Jannatin, M.K. & Dr. Hadi, Msi., psi. (2012). Pengaruh kualitas kehidupan kerja (quality of work life) terhadap produktivitas karyawan produksi. Journal of Industrial and Organization Psychology, 1 (2), 145.
9. Kartika, L. (2009). Analisis kepuasan kerja karyawan melalui faktor-faktor quality of work life (QWL) pada PT. Pertamina (Persero) Perkapalan. Tesis diterbitkan. Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.
10. Kanten, S. & Sadullah, O. (2012). Empirical research on the relationship between quality of work life and work engagement. Journal of Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62 (1) 360 - 36
11. Nitisemito, A.S. (2000). Manajemen personalia: manajemen sumber daya manusia. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
12. Prihantoro, A. (2012). Peningkatan kinerja sumber daya manusia melalui motivasi, disiplin,  lingkungan kerja, dan komitmen. Journal, 8 (2). 79.
13. Susanti, S. (2014). Kontribusi kecerdasan emosional, kualitas kehidupan kerja, dan kesejahteraan psikologis terhadap komitmen organisasi pada petugas halte transjakarta busway. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Gunadarma, Jakarta.