Authors :
Ruby Mahali; Dr. Ujjwal Kumar Halder
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/mr23m29u
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/5erwbf68
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr105
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Over recent decades, digital technology has played a transformative role in reshaping the landscape of higher
education. Online learning platforms, virtual classrooms, digital libraries, and educational applications have expanded
learning opportunities. But despite rapid technology integration, there still exists a significant inequality in the education
system, which is commonly known as the “digital divide”. This divide especially affects disproportionately underprivileged
and marginalised groups of learners. The people from rural communities, economically weaker sections, tribal population,
and gender based disadvantaged groups often face multiple barriers in accessing the benefits of digital education. Thus, this
paper adopts a qualitative interpretative approach to explore the relationship between digital inclusion and education equity
in the context of first-generation learners. The study posits that digital inclusion transcends mere access to technological
devices, encompassing digital literacy, meaningful engagement, and institutional support. It underscores the dual function
of digital technologies as both facilitators and impediments to equitable education. This paper contributes by providing a
conceptual framework for understanding how layered inequalities influence the digital learning experiences of firstgeneration learners and educational strategies to promote inclusive education.
Keywords :
Digital Inclusion, Education Equity, First-Generation Learners, Digital Divide, Socio-Economic Inequality.
References :
- Bailey, L. E., & Nyabola, N. (2021, June). Digital equity as an enabling platform for equality and inclusion (Policy Brief). Centre on International Cooperation, New York University.
- Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Greenwood Press, 241–258.
- Chikwe, C. F., Dagunduro, A. O., Ajuwon, O. A., & Ediae, A. A. (2024). Sociological barriers to equitable digital learning: A data-driven approach. Comprehensive Research and Reviews in Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(1), 27–34. Inclusion First-Generation https://doi.org/10.57219/crrms.2024.2.1.0038
- DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the “digital divide” to “digital inequality”: Studying Internet use as penetration increases. Princeton University Centre for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies,15, 1–30.
- Dong, C., Cao, S., & Li, H. (2020). Young children’s online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Chinese parents’ beliefs and attitudes. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105440
- Gonzalez, E. S., & Deng, X. (2023). Social inclusion: The use of social media and the impact on first-generation college students. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 24(5), 1313–1333. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00792
- Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i4.942
- Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27, 1–12.
- Méndez-Domínguez, P., Carbonero Muñoz, D., Raya Díez, E., & Castillo De Mesa, J. (2023). Digital inclusion for social inclusion: Case study on digital literacy. Frontiers in Communication, 8, 1–10.
- Michikyan, M., Subrahmanyam, K., Regan, P., Cano, M. Á., Castillo, L. G., Harkness, A., & Schwartz, S. J. (2025). Differences in and relationship between digital access, use, connectivity, skill, engagement, and motivation: Implications for digital inequality in online learning among first-generation and continuing-generation undergraduate students. Discover Education, 4(1), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00371-9
- Ministry of Education. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Government of India.
- Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
- Park, S. (2017). Digital capital. Information, Communication & Society, 20(5), 745–760.
- Reay, D. (2017). Miseducation: Inequality and the working classes. Policy Press.
- Reich, J., Buttimer, C. J., Fang, A., et al. (2020). Remote learning guidance from state education agencies during COVID-19. Educational Researcher, 49(7), 549–556.
- Rose, R., & Malkani, R. (2021). The experiences of first-generation learners during educational transition in India. Health, Education & Society, 30(2), 123–138.
- Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
- Singh, J. K. (2022). Digital divide in Indian higher education: A national survey of access and equity. Journal of Advanced Zoology, 43(2), 45–53.
- Sinha, A., & Raj, A. (2025). First-generation learners and higher education: A national survey of access and equity. Journal of Advanced Zoology, 43(2), 45–53.
- Sinha, A., & Raj, A. (2025). First-generation learners and higher educational aspirations in India: A systematic comprehension and future research direction. International Journal of Advanced Research, 13(1), 250–260.
- Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 55, 37–76.
- Tate, T., & Warschauer, M. (2022). Equity in online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2062597
- UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing.
- Van Deursen, A. J., Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2017). The compound inequalities of digital engagement. New Media & Society, 19(4), 452–471.
- Van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.
- Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Sage Publications.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Over recent decades, digital technology has played a transformative role in reshaping the landscape of higher
education. Online learning platforms, virtual classrooms, digital libraries, and educational applications have expanded
learning opportunities. But despite rapid technology integration, there still exists a significant inequality in the education
system, which is commonly known as the “digital divide”. This divide especially affects disproportionately underprivileged
and marginalised groups of learners. The people from rural communities, economically weaker sections, tribal population,
and gender based disadvantaged groups often face multiple barriers in accessing the benefits of digital education. Thus, this
paper adopts a qualitative interpretative approach to explore the relationship between digital inclusion and education equity
in the context of first-generation learners. The study posits that digital inclusion transcends mere access to technological
devices, encompassing digital literacy, meaningful engagement, and institutional support. It underscores the dual function
of digital technologies as both facilitators and impediments to equitable education. This paper contributes by providing a
conceptual framework for understanding how layered inequalities influence the digital learning experiences of firstgeneration learners and educational strategies to promote inclusive education.
Keywords :
Digital Inclusion, Education Equity, First-Generation Learners, Digital Divide, Socio-Economic Inequality.