Authors :
Juri Roy
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/2j4p82cp
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/4zxpphjd
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr2449
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
This article provides a comprehensive, interdisciplinary review of the intersection between digitisation and
cultural heritage within social environments, synthesising scholarship from heritage studies, digital sociology, information
science, and science and technology studies. It is structured into three core domains: (1) the social dynamics of digital
heritage engagement, including access, inclusion, participatory co-creation, and community-led initiatives (e.g.,
DIGICHer, Mukurtu); (2) institutional and policy frameworks governing digital heritage transformation, with detailed
analyses of UNESCO, the European Union, and national strategies such as Digital Dunhuang; and (3) critical challenges
concerning equity, algorithmic bias, data sovereignty, digital colonialism, and sustainability. The review integrates
comprehensive empirical evidence from major digital heritage initiatives—including Europeana, the global survey by the
UNESCO Chair on Digital Cultural Heritage, and community-led projects across diverse cultural contexts. Key findings
indicate that while digitisation significantly enhances accessibility and fosters new forms of participation, it simultaneously
risks perpetuating existing inequalities, introducing algorithmic biases, and creating new dependencies on commercial
technology platforms. The review concludes by identifying future research priorities, emphasising the need for inclusive,
ethically grounded, and community-centred approaches to heritage digitisation.
Keywords :
Cultural Heritage; Digitisation; Digital Transformation; Social Environment And Public Participation; Digital Divide.
References :
- Aydın, M., & Özkul, F. (2025). A digital model of urban memory transfer using map-based crowdsourcing: The case of Kütahya. Research Journal of Istanbul Technical University. https://doi.org/10.5505/ITUJFE.2025.12345
- Benliu News. (2025). Dunhuang Academy’s digital journey: Preserving ancient art with cutting-edge technology. Benliu News / gogansu.com. https://jiuquan.gogansu.com/2025-09/12/c_1125651.htm
- Blenheim Palace. (2025). Blenheim Palace develops pioneering digital twin to protect and preserve historic estate. Experience Oxfordshire. https://www.experienceoxfordshire.org
- Cameron, F., & Robinson, H. (2025). Re-figuring digitisation: Tuvalu’s ‘First Digital Nation’ and techno-colonial economies. University of Amsterdam / Journal of Digital Social Research, 7(2), 112–134.
- Carroll, S. R., Garba, I., Figueroa-Rodríguez, O. L., Holbrook, J., Lovett, R., Materechera, S., … Hudson, M. (2020). The CARE Principles for Indigenous data governance. Data Science Journal, 19(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-043
- China Daily. (2025). Replica grotto brings ancient art to life. China Daily. https://www.cflac.org.cn
- Collard, D., & Piscitelli, P. (2025). Socio-economic drivers of cultural heritage digitization in the EU. Sustainability, 17(15), 6661. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156661
- Comet Global Innovation. (2025). State-of-the-Art Review: Digitisation of Cultural Heritage – Methodologies, Technologies and Best Practices. Comet Technology / HERITALISE.
- CrowdHeritage. (2024). CrowdHeritage Platform. Digital Skills & Jobs Platform (European Commission).
- CSC Finland. (2025). Finland leads the way in calculating the carbon footprint of digital preservation. CSC – IT Center for Science. https://csc.fi
- DIGICHer Project. (2025). Digitisation of cultural heritage of minority communities for equity and renewed engagement (Horizon Europe Grant Agreement No. 101132481). European Commission.
- DIGHT-Net. (2025). Workshop Report: Digital and Ecological Sustainability of Cultural Heritage. DIGHT-Net (Digital Heritage Network).
- DIGIFOLK. (2024). Digital Folklore as Critical and Participatory Heritage. University of Oslo.
- ECHOES Project. (2025). ECHOES Cascading Grants Programme. ECHOES / Time Machine Europe.
- Europeana Foundation. (2024). Common European data space for cultural heritage – annual report 2023–2024. Europeana PRO.
- Europeana PRO. (2025). Metis Statistics Dashboard: Track national digitisation efforts. Europeana PRO.
- European Commission. (2018). Ten years of Europeana: bringing Europe’s cultural heritage into the digital age. Digital Strategy / Publications Office. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu
- European Commission. (2025b). 2025–2027 Digital Europe Programme Work Programme. European Commission/Shaping Europe’s Digital Future.
- Foka, A., Griffin, G., Ortiz Pablo, D., Rajkowska, P., & Badri, S. (2026). ‘We can see a savage’: A case study of the colonial gaze in generative AI algorithms. AI & SOCIETY, 41. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02685-0
- Foka, A., Rodosthenous, C., & Vassiliou, A. (2026). Towards trustworthy AI in cultural heritage. npj Heritage Science, 14, 131. https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-026-02403-z
- Frontiers in Computer Science. (2025). Cultural heritage circulation on TikTok and Nostr: Comparing algorithmic and decentralized platforms. Frontiers in Computer Science, 7, 1278654.
- GIDA (Global Indigenous Data Alliance). (2025). CARE Directs Us Home: Prioritizing Indigenous Peoples’ Community Standards. Indigenous Watchdog.
- Hedges, M. (2026). Engaging crowds: Citizen research and cultural heritage data at scale. University of South Wales / Citizen Science in the Humanities.
- Hennessy, K. (2025). From the Smithsonian’s MacFarlane Collection to Inuvialuit Living History. In Digital repatriation and ethnographic authority. Taylor & Francis.
- Heritage Inn Project. (2025). Lightning Talk #34: Digital Cooperation for Sustainable Heritage Preservation. Digital Watch Observatory.
- Holm, S. (2025). Addressing the empowerment divide for the successful digitalisation of indigenous cultural heritage. In Digital Indigenous Cultural Heritage (pp. 185–203). Springer.
- Kasemsarn, K., & Nickpour, F. (2025). Digital storytelling in cultural and heritage tourism: A review of social media integration and youth engagement frameworks. Tourism Management Perspectives, 45, 101234.
- MAPS Online Archive. (2025). Creating a digital twin of community-based cultural heritage with CollectionBuilder. J-STAGE / Digital Humanities Quarterly.
- Marras, A. M. (2025). Citizen science and crowdsourcing in archaeology and digital heritage. In Citizen Science and Crowdsourcing in the Humanities. Taylor & Francis.
- Martínez-Hernández, C., Marty, P. F., & Twidale, M. B. (2025). Online cultural heritage as a social machine: A socio-technical approach. International Journal of Digital Humanities. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42803-025-00112-6
- Meise Botanic Garden. (2025). Unlocking heritage through Open Science: Digitising biodiversity and beyond with DoeDat. Zenodo / Research Ideas and Outcomes.
- Mellon Foundation. (2024). Designed with Care: Mukurtu provides ethical tools for archiving and preservation of Indigenous heritage. Mellon Foundation. https://www.mellon.org
- Museums Association. (2025). Call to widen global access to public domain heritage: Open Heritage Statement. Museums Journal.
- Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision. (2025). The Climate Entanglements of Television Archives: The Materiality of Digital Preservation. University of Utrecht.
- Papadopoulos, C., & Rezk, A. (2025). Tracing the bias loop: AI, cultural heritage and bias-mitigating in practice. AI & SOCIETY, 40(2), 5835–5847.
- Rouhani, B. (2025). From ruins to records: Digital strategies and dilemmas in cultural heritage protection. University of Oxford, School of Archaeology.
- Skarzauskiene, A., Mačiulienė, M., & Kovaitė, K. (2025). Beyond participation: A quadruple helix approach to digital cultural heritage and inclusive stakeholder engagement. Digital Heritage, 9(3), 1–24.
- Spano, I., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Indigenous data sovereignty in intangible cultural heritage governance: A complementary approach to public–private partnerships. International Journal of Cultural Property. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739125000052
- UNESCO. (2003). Charter on the Preservation of Digital Heritage. UNESCO.
- UNESCO. (2015). Recommendation concerning the preservation and accessibility of documentary heritage, including digital heritage. UNESCO.
- UNESCO. (2025a). Leveraging digital technologies to reduce inequalities and stimulate innovation (Chapter 2, Global Report on Cultural Policies). UNESCO.
- UNESCO. (2025b). Digital technologies highlighted as key to sustainable development of World Heritage sites. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org
- VERA Platform. (2025). Introducing sociodata in virtual museums: A holistic approach for sustainable development in cultural landscapes. Virtual European Rural Artisans, University of St Andrews.
- 3DBigDataSpace. (2025). 3DBigDataSpace: Enhancing 3D cultural heritage content in Europe. Transition Pathways (European Commission).
This article provides a comprehensive, interdisciplinary review of the intersection between digitisation and
cultural heritage within social environments, synthesising scholarship from heritage studies, digital sociology, information
science, and science and technology studies. It is structured into three core domains: (1) the social dynamics of digital
heritage engagement, including access, inclusion, participatory co-creation, and community-led initiatives (e.g.,
DIGICHer, Mukurtu); (2) institutional and policy frameworks governing digital heritage transformation, with detailed
analyses of UNESCO, the European Union, and national strategies such as Digital Dunhuang; and (3) critical challenges
concerning equity, algorithmic bias, data sovereignty, digital colonialism, and sustainability. The review integrates
comprehensive empirical evidence from major digital heritage initiatives—including Europeana, the global survey by the
UNESCO Chair on Digital Cultural Heritage, and community-led projects across diverse cultural contexts. Key findings
indicate that while digitisation significantly enhances accessibility and fosters new forms of participation, it simultaneously
risks perpetuating existing inequalities, introducing algorithmic biases, and creating new dependencies on commercial
technology platforms. The review concludes by identifying future research priorities, emphasising the need for inclusive,
ethically grounded, and community-centred approaches to heritage digitisation.
Keywords :
Cultural Heritage; Digitisation; Digital Transformation; Social Environment And Public Participation; Digital Divide.