Authors : Olalekan Samuel Agbeniyi; Rotimi Olaosebikan

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 9 - September

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/58kyxc4m

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/ykt37a92

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP778

Abstract : This study investigates the spatial decay rate of speech in performance spaces and open-plan offices, focusing on the effects of sound absorption and screen height. Utilising parameters such as D2, SD_2, SD2, S (decay rate) and Lp, A, S, 4mL_p, A, S, 4mLp, A, S, 4m (sound pressure level at 4 meters), the research evaluates how acoustic environments impact speech transmission. Through detailed experiments on different screen heights (1.2 m, 2.1 m, and 2.9 m) and material absorption, it was found that increasing screen height significantly reduces the spatial speech decay in open-plan offices, but only up to a certain threshold. The results suggest that while acoustic enhancements like screens and absorptive materials improve speech privacy, over-reliance on single- number ratings can lead to misclassification of office acoustics. This research provides insights for optimising room acoustics, ensuring speech privacy, and meeting acoustic comfort standards.

Keywords : Spatial Speech Decay, Open-Plan Offices, Sound Absorption, Screen Height, Speech Privacy, Room Acoustics.

References :

1. Jia, X., Yan, M., & Hong, M. (2021). Sound energy enhancement via impedance-matched anisotropic metamaterial. Materials & Design. sciencedirect.com
2. Darmon, M., Dorval, V., & Baqué, F. (2020). Acoustic scattering models from rough surfaces: A brief review and recent advances. Applied Sciences. mdpi.com
3. Qu, S. & Sheng, P. (2020). Minimising indoor sound energy with tunable metamaterial surfaces. Physical Review Applied. researchgate.net
4. Wang, Y. Z. & Ma, L. (2024). Sound insulation performance of curved sandwich structure combined with acoustic metamaterials. Journal of Vibration and Control. [HTML]
5. Li, X. S., Wang, Y. F., Chen, A. L., & Wang, Y. S. (2020). An arbitrarily curved acoustic metasurface for three-dimensional reflected wave-front modulation. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 53(19), 195301. researchgate.net
6. Liang, L. & Yu, G. (2023). Effect of speaker orientation on speech intelligibility in an automotive environment. Applied Acoustics. [HTML]
7. Mapp, P. (2022). Speech Intelligibility of Sound Systems. Sound Reinforcement for Audio Engineers. [HTML]
8. Mansour, N., Marschall, M., May, T., Westermann, A., & Dau, T. (2021). Speech intelligibility in a realistic virtual sound environment. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 149(4), 2791-2801. aip.org
9. Visentin, C., Pellegatti, M., & Prodi, N. (2020). Effect of a single lateral diffuse reflection on spatial percepts and speech intelligibility. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 148(1), 122-140. [HTML]
10. Klein, J. (2020). Directional room impulse response measurement. archive.org
11. Čurović, L., Murovec, J., Novaković, T., & Prezelj, J. (2022). Time-frequency methods for characterisation of room impulse responses and decay time measurement. Measurement. [HTML]
12. Ljunggren, F., Simmons, C., & Pettersson, M. (2022). Uncertainty of in situ low frequency reverberation time measurements from 20 Hz–An empirical study; Part II: Impulse response method. Noise Control Engineering Journal, 70(3), 298-308. [HTML]
13. Vu, T. P. & Lissek, H. (2020). Low frequency sound field reconstruction in a non-rectangular room using a small number of microphones. Acta Acustica. edpsciences.org
14. Zhao, S., Zhu, Q., Cheng, E., & Burnett, I. S. (2022). A room impulse response database for multizone sound field reproduction (L). The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 152(4), 2505-2512. [HTML]
15. Houterman, T. H. M. (2020). A design of an omnidirectional sound source used for impulse response measurements. tue.nl
16. Pezzoli, M., Canclini, A., Antonacci, F., & Sarti, A. (2022). A comparative analysis of the directional sound radiation of historical violins. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 152(1), 354-367. [HTML]
17. Hassan, F., Mahmood, A. K. B., Yahya, N., Saboor, A., Abbas, M. Z., Khan, Z., & Rimsan, M. (2021). State-of-the-art review on the acoustic emission source localisation techniques. IEEE Access, 9, 101246-101266. ieee.org
18. Fürjes, A. T. (2020). Investigating properties of random sound source constellations. Forum Acusticum. hal.science
19. Gao, N., Wu, J., Lu, K., & Zhong, H. (2021). Hybrid composite meta-porous structure for improving and broadening sound absorption. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. [HTML]
20. Tudor, E. M., Dettendorfer, A., Kain, G., Barbu, M. C., Réh, R., & Krišťák, Ľ. (2020). Sound-absorption coefficient of bark-based insulation panels. Polymers, 12(5), 1012. mdpi.com
21. Li, X., Yu, X., Chua, J. W., Lee, H. P., Ding, J., & Zhai, W. (2021). Microlattice metamaterials with simultaneous superior acoustic and mechanical energy absorption. Small. [HTML]
22. Li, X., Liu, B., & Chang, D. (2021). An acoustic impedance structure consisting of perforated panel resonator and porous material for low-to-mid frequency sound absorption. Applied Acoustics. [HTML]
23. Tang, Y., Zhou, Q., Xie, Z., Pan, Y., Ji, G., & Lü, X. (2024). Research on multipath performance of acoustic spread-spectrum signals based on artificial multipath experiments in an anechoic chamber. Applied Acoustics. [HTML]
24. He, L., Liu, Y., & Zhang, G. (2023). Research and application of tristable stochastic resonance based on harmonic and pinning potential model. Journal of Vibration and Control. [HTML]
25. Abdelhafez, A., Abdelhalim, A., Abdulrahman, G. A., Haque, M. A., Habib, M. A., & Nemitallah, M. A. (2024). Stability, near flashback combustion dynamics, and NOx emissions of H2/N2/air flames in a micromixer-based model gas turbine combustor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 61, 102-112. [HTML]
26. Eggenschwiler, K., Heutschi, K., Taghipour, A., Pieren, R., Gisladottir, A., & Schäffer, B. (2022). Urban design of inner courtyards and road traffic noise: Influence of façade characteristics and building orientation on perceived noise annoyance. Building and Environment, 224, 109526. sciencedirect.com
27. Xiang, L., Wang, G., Zhu, C., Shi, M., Hu, J., & Luo, G. (2022). Ventilation barrier with space-coiling channels of varying cross-section for broadband sound insulation. Applied Acoustics. [HTML]
28. Hu, Z., Zayed, T., & Cheng, L. (2022). A critical review of acoustic modeling and research on building façade. Building Acoustics. sagepub.com
29. Amran, M., Fediuk, R., Murali, G., Vatin, N., & Al-Fakih, A. (2021). Sound-absorbing acoustic concretes: A review. Sustainability. mdpi.com
30. Tao, Y., Ren, M., Zhang, H., & Peijs, T. (2021). Recent progress in acoustic materials and noise control strategies–A review. Applied Materials Today. [HTML]
31. Li, H., Yang, H., Yuan, R., Sun, Z., Yang, Y., Zhao, J., ... & Zhang, Z. (2021). Ultrahigh Spatial Resolution, Fast Decay, and Stable X‐Ray Scintillation Screen through Assembling CsPbBr3 Nanocrystals Arrays in Anodized Aluminum Oxide. Advanced Optical Materials, 9(24), 2101297. [HTML]
32. De Luca, F., Sepúlveda, A., & Varjas, T. (2022). Multi-performance optimisation of static shading devices for glare, daylight, view and energy consideration. Building and Environment. researchgate.net
33. Mao, Z., Chimitt, N., & Chan, S. H. (2020). Image reconstruction of static and dynamic scenes through anisoplanatic turbulence. IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, 6, 1415-1428. ieee.org
34. Cressie, N. & Moores, M. T. (2023). Spatial statistics. Encyclopedia of mathematical geosciences. [PDF]