Authors : Etika Inda Hartina Pangale; Andi Asnudin; Adnan Fadjar

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 7 - July

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/5bps3fh5

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/bddureyx

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jul738

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Palu City is an area with a very high level of disaster vulnerability due to its location on the Palu Koro Fault line and its potential for tsunamis and liquefaction. The earthquake, tsunami, and liquefaction disaster on September 28, 2018, caused damage to more than 1,100 educational facilities. This study aims to identify and analyze disaster risks in educational facilities in Palu City, assess the level of risk based on the ISO 31000:2018 approach, and formulate disaster risk mitigation strategies. The research employs a mixed-methods approach combining quantitative and qualitative methods with an explanatory sequential design. Data were collected through observation, questionnaires, interviews, and documentation at three elementary schools in Palu City: SDN 1 Talise, SDN Balaroa, and SD Integral Hidayatullah. The analysis was conducted through risk identification, risk analysis using a risk matrix, risk evaluation, and risk treatment stages. The results identified 24 risk indicators with risk values ranging from 7.28 to 11.89. The highest risks were damage to school facilities due to earthquake ground shaking (11.89), school location in disaster-prone zones (11.32), and tsunami threat (11.22). Most risks fell into the moderate and high categories. Recommended mitigation strategies include developing evacuation SOPs, providing evacuation routes and assembly points, installing evacuation signage, conducting regular disaster simulations, and enhancing the capacity of school community members through disaster education.

Keywords : Disaster Risk Management, ISO 31000:2018 Standard, School Buildings, Non-Structural Mitigation, Earthquake-Prone Areas.

References :

1. Asnudin, A., Ali, A. A., & Muhtar, T. (2024). Evaluation of Disaster Risk and Mitigation Strategies for Post-Disaster Permanent Housing in the Palu Koro Fault Area. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 14(6), 18941-18948.
2. BNPB. (2019). Laporan Bencana 28 September 2018. Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana.
3. BNPB. (2023). Data Bencana Indonesia 2010-2023. Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana.
4. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
5. Danar, O. R. (2020). Disaster Governance: Sebuah Pengantar. Diva Press.
6. Gentile, R., & Galasso, C. (2019). Earthquake and Tsunami Risk Prioritisation of Indonesian Schools Through Rapid Visual Survey. London: University College London.
7. Hutchins, G. (2018). ISO 31000: 2018 Enterprise Risk Management. John Wiley & Sons.
8. ISO. (2018). ISO 31000:2018 Risk Management - Guidelines. International Organization for Standardization.
9. Muin, S. A., & Maulana, A. (2024). Risk Management Analysis Based on ISO 31000:2018 at Andi Djemma Masamba Airport. Pena Teknik: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Teknik, 78-88.
10. Peek, L. (2008). Children and Disasters: Understanding Vulnerability, Developing Capacities, and Promoting Resilience - An Introduction. Children, Youth and Environments, 18(1), 1-29.
11. Rachmawati, T. A., Rahmawati, D., & Susilo, A. (2018). Pengurangan Risiko Bencana Berbasis Tata Ruang. Universitas Brawijaya Press.
12. Supartoyo, S., Sulaiman, C., & Junaedi, D. (2014). Kelas Tektonik Sesar Palu Koro, Sulawesi Tengah. Jurnal Lingkungan dan Bencana Geologi, 5(2), 111-128.
13. Wekke, I. S. (2021). Mitigasi Bencana. Penerbit Adab.
14. Widayati, T. (2019). Menggagas Mitigasi Bencana Nonstruktural dalam Pendidikan Multikeaksaraan. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.