Authors :
John Joseph P. Villotes
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 2 - February
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/uuvypafx
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/3ndyjesy
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26feb1106
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
The dynamic capabilities perspective explains how firms reconfigure resources to sustain competitive advantage
under conditions of environmental change. Despite extensive theoretical development, empirical findings on the relative
influence of dynamic capabilities and environmental dynamism on firm performance remain context-dependent and
fragmented, particularly in emerging manufacturing economies. This study examines the joint and comparative effects of
dynamic capabilities and environmental dynamism on organizational performance using a convergent mixed-methods
design. Quantitative data were collected from 317 managers of manufacturing firms, complemented by qualitative
interviews and focus group discussions with 17 senior managers. Results show that both constructs significantly influence
performance, jointly explaining 77.5% of its variance. However, dynamic capabilities demonstrate substantially stronger
predictive power than environmental dynamism. Qualitative findings reveal that strategic flexibility, innovation orientation,
and technology integration function as embedded managerial routines that sustain performance outcomes. The study
contributes to dynamic capability theory by clarifying boundary conditions in moderately dynamic environments and
extending empirical evidence to resource-constrained manufacturing contexts. Implications for theory and practice are
discussed.
Keywords :
Dynamic Capabilities; Environmental Dynamism; Firm Performance; Manufacturing Firms; Emerging Economy; Strategic Flexibility; Innovation Capability.
References :
- Barreto, I. (2010). Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 36(1), 256–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350776
- Breznik, L., & Hisrich, R. D. (2014). Dynamic capabilities vs. innovation capability: Are they related? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 21(3), 368–384.
- Drnevich, P. L., & Kriauciunas, A. P. (2011). Clarifying the conditions and limits of the contributions of ordinary and dynamic capabilities to relative firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 32(3), 254–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.882
- Fainshmidt, S., Pezeshkan, A., Lance Frazier, M., Nair, A., & Markowski, E. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational performance: A meta-analytic evaluation and extension. Journal of Management Studies, 53(8), 1348–1380. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12213
- Helfat, C. E., & Martin, J. A. (2015). Dynamic managerial capabilities: Review and assessment of managerial impact on strategic change. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1281–1312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314561301
- Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2015). Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 831–850. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2247
- Inan, G. G., & Bititci, U. S. (2015). Understanding organizational capabilities and dynamic capabilities in the context of micro enterprises: A research agenda. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 210, 310–319.
- Karna, A., Richter, A., & Riesenkampff, E. (2016). Revisiting the role of the environment in the capabilities–performance relationship: A meta-analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 37(6), 1153–1173. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2379
- Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2011). Understanding the elusive black box of dynamic capabilities. Decision Sciences, 42(1), 239–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00287.x
- Protogerou, A., Caloghirou, Y., & Lioukas, S. (2012). Dynamic capabilities and their indirect impact on firm performance. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(3), 615–647. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtr049
- Schilke, O., Hu, S., & Helfat, C. E. (2018). Quo vadis, dynamic capabilities? A content-analytic review of the current state of knowledge and recommendations for future research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(4), 390–439. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2016.0014
- Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
- Teece, D. J. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial management in large organizations: Toward a theory of the (entrepreneurial) firm. European Economic Review, 86, 202–216.
- Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
- Wilden, R., Devinney, T. M., & Dowling, G. R. (2016). The architecture of dynamic capability research: Identifying the building blocks of a configurational approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 997–1076. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1161966
The dynamic capabilities perspective explains how firms reconfigure resources to sustain competitive advantage
under conditions of environmental change. Despite extensive theoretical development, empirical findings on the relative
influence of dynamic capabilities and environmental dynamism on firm performance remain context-dependent and
fragmented, particularly in emerging manufacturing economies. This study examines the joint and comparative effects of
dynamic capabilities and environmental dynamism on organizational performance using a convergent mixed-methods
design. Quantitative data were collected from 317 managers of manufacturing firms, complemented by qualitative
interviews and focus group discussions with 17 senior managers. Results show that both constructs significantly influence
performance, jointly explaining 77.5% of its variance. However, dynamic capabilities demonstrate substantially stronger
predictive power than environmental dynamism. Qualitative findings reveal that strategic flexibility, innovation orientation,
and technology integration function as embedded managerial routines that sustain performance outcomes. The study
contributes to dynamic capability theory by clarifying boundary conditions in moderately dynamic environments and
extending empirical evidence to resource-constrained manufacturing contexts. Implications for theory and practice are
discussed.
Keywords :
Dynamic Capabilities; Environmental Dynamism; Firm Performance; Manufacturing Firms; Emerging Economy; Strategic Flexibility; Innovation Capability.