⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Dynamic Capabilities, Environmental Dynamism, and Firm Performance: Evidence from an Emerging Manufacturing Economy


Authors : John Joseph P. Villotes

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 2 - February


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/uuvypafx

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3ndyjesy

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26feb1106

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : The dynamic capabilities perspective explains how firms reconfigure resources to sustain competitive advantage under conditions of environmental change. Despite extensive theoretical development, empirical findings on the relative influence of dynamic capabilities and environmental dynamism on firm performance remain context-dependent and fragmented, particularly in emerging manufacturing economies. This study examines the joint and comparative effects of dynamic capabilities and environmental dynamism on organizational performance using a convergent mixed-methods design. Quantitative data were collected from 317 managers of manufacturing firms, complemented by qualitative interviews and focus group discussions with 17 senior managers. Results show that both constructs significantly influence performance, jointly explaining 77.5% of its variance. However, dynamic capabilities demonstrate substantially stronger predictive power than environmental dynamism. Qualitative findings reveal that strategic flexibility, innovation orientation, and technology integration function as embedded managerial routines that sustain performance outcomes. The study contributes to dynamic capability theory by clarifying boundary conditions in moderately dynamic environments and extending empirical evidence to resource-constrained manufacturing contexts. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

Keywords : Dynamic Capabilities; Environmental Dynamism; Firm Performance; Manufacturing Firms; Emerging Economy; Strategic Flexibility; Innovation Capability.

References :

  1. Barreto, I. (2010). Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 36(1), 256–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350776
  2. Breznik, L., & Hisrich, R. D. (2014). Dynamic capabilities vs. innovation capability: Are they related? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 21(3), 368–384.
  3. Drnevich, P. L., & Kriauciunas, A. P. (2011). Clarifying the conditions and limits of the contributions of ordinary and dynamic capabilities to relative firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 32(3), 254–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.882
  4. Fainshmidt, S., Pezeshkan, A., Lance Frazier, M., Nair, A., & Markowski, E. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational performance: A meta-analytic evaluation and extension. Journal of Management Studies, 53(8), 1348–1380. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12213
  5. Helfat, C. E., & Martin, J. A. (2015). Dynamic managerial capabilities: Review and assessment of managerial impact on strategic change. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1281–1312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314561301
  6. Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2015). Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 831–850. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2247
  7. Inan, G. G., & Bititci, U. S. (2015). Understanding organizational capabilities and dynamic capabilities in the context of micro enterprises: A research agenda. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 210, 310–319.
  8. Karna, A., Richter, A., & Riesenkampff, E. (2016). Revisiting the role of the environment in the capabilities–performance relationship: A meta-analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 37(6), 1153–1173. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2379
  9. Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2011). Understanding the elusive black box of dynamic capabilities. Decision Sciences, 42(1), 239–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00287.x
  10. Protogerou, A., Caloghirou, Y., & Lioukas, S. (2012). Dynamic capabilities and their indirect impact on firm performance. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(3), 615–647. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtr049
  11. Schilke, O., Hu, S., & Helfat, C. E. (2018). Quo vadis, dynamic capabilities? A content-analytic review of the current state of knowledge and recommendations for future research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(4), 390–439. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2016.0014
  12. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
  13. Teece, D. J. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial management in large organizations: Toward a theory of the (entrepreneurial) firm. European Economic Review, 86, 202–216.
  14. Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
  15. Wilden, R., Devinney, T. M., & Dowling, G. R. (2016). The architecture of dynamic capability research: Identifying the building blocks of a configurational approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 997–1076. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1161966

The dynamic capabilities perspective explains how firms reconfigure resources to sustain competitive advantage under conditions of environmental change. Despite extensive theoretical development, empirical findings on the relative influence of dynamic capabilities and environmental dynamism on firm performance remain context-dependent and fragmented, particularly in emerging manufacturing economies. This study examines the joint and comparative effects of dynamic capabilities and environmental dynamism on organizational performance using a convergent mixed-methods design. Quantitative data were collected from 317 managers of manufacturing firms, complemented by qualitative interviews and focus group discussions with 17 senior managers. Results show that both constructs significantly influence performance, jointly explaining 77.5% of its variance. However, dynamic capabilities demonstrate substantially stronger predictive power than environmental dynamism. Qualitative findings reveal that strategic flexibility, innovation orientation, and technology integration function as embedded managerial routines that sustain performance outcomes. The study contributes to dynamic capability theory by clarifying boundary conditions in moderately dynamic environments and extending empirical evidence to resource-constrained manufacturing contexts. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

Keywords : Dynamic Capabilities; Environmental Dynamism; Firm Performance; Manufacturing Firms; Emerging Economy; Strategic Flexibility; Innovation Capability.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - March - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe