⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Dynamic Capabilities, Organizational Resilience and Organizational Ambidexterity of Manufacturing Firms in Nairobi, Kenya


Authors : Flora Kisale; Dr. Ambrose Kemboi; Ronald Bonuke

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 3 - March


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/9kreamuk

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/tnwnubtj

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26mar644

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This study examined the relationship between dynamic capabilities, organizational resilience, and organizational ambidexterity among manufacturing firms in Nairobi County, Kenya. The study was motivated by the need to understand how firms balance exploration and exploitation in dynamic environments. Specifically, it sought to determine the effect of dynamic capabilities on ambidexterity and the moderating role of organizational resilience. An explanatory research design was adopted, with data collected from 357 firms and analyzed using correlation and regression techniques. The results revealed strong positive relationships between dynamic capabilities and ambidexterity (r = .712, p < .01), and between resilience and ambidexterity (r = .657, p < .01). Regression analysis showed that dynamic capabilities (β = .744, p < .001) and organizational resilience (β = .418, p < .001) significantly influence ambidexterity, explaining 62.3% of the variance (R² = .623). However, the moderating effect of resilience was not significant (β = -.033, p > .05). The study concludes that dynamic capabilities are the primary drivers of organizational ambidexterity, while resilience plays a supportive but non-moderating role. It recommends that firms invest in innovation, adaptability, and strategic flexibility to enhance ambidextrous capabilities.

Keywords : Dynamic Capabilities, Organizational Resilience, Organizational Ambidexterity, Manufacturing Firms.

References :

  1. Ambrosini, V., & Altintas, G. (2019). Dynamic managerial capabilities. In D. J. Teece & S. Augier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of dynamic capabilities (pp. 223–244). Oxford University Press.
  2. Baía, E., & Ferreira, J. J. (2024). Dynamic capabilities and firm performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 172, 114–128.
  3. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
  4. Barreto, I. (2010). Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 36(1), 256–280.
  5. Birkinshaw, J. (2023). Strategic management and organizational ambidexterity: Contemporary perspectives. Oxford University Press.
  6. Birkinshaw, J., & Gibson, C. B. (2004). Building ambidexterity into an organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(4), 47–55.
  7. Ciasullo, M. V., Montera, R., Douglas, A., & Palumbo, R. (2022). Ready for resilience? A literature review on organizational resilience and digital transformation. Journal of Business Research, 139, 141–155.
  8. Day, G. S., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (2016). Adapting to fast-changing markets and technologies. California Management Review, 58(4), 59–77.
  9. Di Stefano, G., Peteraf, M., & Verona, G. (2010). Dynamic capabilities deconstructed: A bibliographic investigation into the origins, development, and future directions of the research domain. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(4), 1187–1204.
  10. Drnevich, P. L., Marino, L., & Withers, M. C. (2020). Dynamic capabilities and organizational ambidexterity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 46(1), 1–34.
  11. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121.
  12. Fitriati, R., Purwana, D., & Buchdadi, A. D. (2020). Dynamic capabilities and firm performance: Evidence from manufacturing firms. Management Science Letters, 10(7), 1501–1510.
  13. Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2009). Understanding dynamic capabilities: Progress along a developmental path. Strategic Organization, 7(1), 91–102.
  14. Iftikhar, R., Purvis, L., & Giannoccaro, I. (2021). A meta-analytical review of organizational resilience and firm performance. International Journal of Production Research, 59(21), 1–17.
  15. Isensee, C., Teuteberg, F., Griese, K. M., & Topi, H. (2023). The role of digitalization in building organizational resilience. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 65(2), 201–219.
  16. Linnenluecke, M. K. (2017). Resilience in business and management research: A review of influential publications and a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 4–30.
  17. Liu, Y., Lee, J. M., & Lee, C. (2024). Organizational resilience and dynamic capabilities: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Business Research, 170, 114–126.
  18. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.
  19. Nedzinskas, S., Pundziene, A., Buoziute-Rafanaviciene, S., & Pilkiene, M. (2013). The impact of dynamic capabilities on SME performance in a volatile environment. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 24(4), 376–385.
  20. O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2021). Lead and disrupt: How to solve the innovator’s dilemma (2nd ed.). Stanford University Press.
  21. Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., & Bansal, P. (2016). The long-term benefits of organizational resilience through sustainable business practices. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1615–1631.
  22. Pezeshkan, A., Fainshmidt, S., Nair, A., Frazier, M. L., & Markowski, E. (2016). An empirical assessment of the dynamic capabilities–performance relationship. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2950–2956.
  23. Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. (2019). Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 80–103.
  24. Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403.
  25. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.
  26. Teece, D. J. (2012). Dynamic capabilities: Routines versus entrepreneurial action. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1395–1401.
  27. Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49.
  28. Teece, D. J. (2023). Dynamic capabilities: Theory, strategy, and organization. Oxford University Press.
  29. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
  30. Wilden, R., Devinney, T. M., & Dowling, G. R. (2013). The impact of dynamic capabilities on firm performance: Evidence from a global study. British Journal of Management, 24(3), 315–332.
  31. Williams, T. A., & Shepherd, D. A. (2016). Building resilience or providing sustenance: Different paths of emergent ventures in the aftermath of disaster. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 2069–2102.
  32. Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991–995.
  33. Zimmermann, A., Raisch, S., & Cardinal, L. B. (2018). Managing persistent tensions on the frontline: A configurational perspective on ambidexterity. Journal of Management Studies, 55(5), 739–769.
  34. Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339–351.

This study examined the relationship between dynamic capabilities, organizational resilience, and organizational ambidexterity among manufacturing firms in Nairobi County, Kenya. The study was motivated by the need to understand how firms balance exploration and exploitation in dynamic environments. Specifically, it sought to determine the effect of dynamic capabilities on ambidexterity and the moderating role of organizational resilience. An explanatory research design was adopted, with data collected from 357 firms and analyzed using correlation and regression techniques. The results revealed strong positive relationships between dynamic capabilities and ambidexterity (r = .712, p < .01), and between resilience and ambidexterity (r = .657, p < .01). Regression analysis showed that dynamic capabilities (β = .744, p < .001) and organizational resilience (β = .418, p < .001) significantly influence ambidexterity, explaining 62.3% of the variance (R² = .623). However, the moderating effect of resilience was not significant (β = -.033, p > .05). The study concludes that dynamic capabilities are the primary drivers of organizational ambidexterity, while resilience plays a supportive but non-moderating role. It recommends that firms invest in innovation, adaptability, and strategic flexibility to enhance ambidextrous capabilities.

Keywords : Dynamic Capabilities, Organizational Resilience, Organizational Ambidexterity, Manufacturing Firms.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - March - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe