Early Childhood Care and Education: A Systematic Literature Review in Indian Context


Authors : Chiranjibi Behera; Amulya Kumar Acharya

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 4 - April

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3c5htrze

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/469urhkf

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24APR2504

Abstract : Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE) is often regarded as A key element of universal education. This study delves into the landscape of Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE) in India through a systematic review of literature. After extensive attempts, several nations throughout the world are making strides toward securing ECCE. Despite this, the majority of them were unable to reach or compromise on this aim owing to insufficient resources, bad planning, and weak strategies for implementation, particularly in a large and populated nation such as India. The development of quality standards and curriculum frameworks, plans, acts, constitutional amendments, schemes, and flagship programmes like, District Primary Education Programme (DPEP), Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) and Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan are just a few of the initiatives the Indian government has launched to improve quality. It has resulted in both anticipated and unexpected concerns and obstacles due to India's compromise on the non- negotiable ECCE quality requirements. Consequently, the government's objective of guaranteeing quality in ECCE was not fully achieved. However, recent research indicates significant advancements in quality improvements. Of course, there are unsatisfactory results in certain areas and components, but there has also been progress in other areas, suggesting that maintaining quality is a realistic objective. This research aims to present an overview of the Government of India's operations, assess the situation on the ground, pinpoint the primary hurdles to ECCE quality development and offer workable solutions to overcome those hurdles.

Keywords : Early Childhood Care and Education, Early Childhood Education, Quality Standards, Anganwadi Centres, Integrated Child Development Services

References :

  1. Annual Status of Education Report. (2013). Annual status of education report (Rural) 2013- Provisional. New Delhi: ASER Centre.
  2. Barnett, L.M., Salmon, J. & Hesketh, K.D. More active pre-school children have better motor competence at school starting age: an observational cohort study. BMC Public Health 16, 1068 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3742-1
  3. Barnett, William. (2011). Preschool Education as an Educational Reform: Issues of Effectiveness and Access Overall Impacts of Preschool Education.
  4. Bhattacharjea, S., & Ramanujan, P. (2019). What do children in rural India do in their early years? Retrieved from https://www.ideasforindia.in/topics/ macroeconomics/what-do-children-in-rural-india-do-in-their-early-years.html
  5. Bierman KL, Nix RL, Heinrichs BS, Domitrovich CE, Gest SD, Welsh JA, & Gill S. (2014). Effects of Head Start REDI on children’s outcomes 1 year later in different kindergarten contexts. Child Development, 85, 140–159. DOI: 10.1111/cdev. 12117
  6. Burchinal, M., Vandergrift, N., Pianta, R., & Mashburn, A. (2010). Threshold analysis of association between child care quality and child outcomes for low-income children in pre-kindergarten programs. In Early Childhood Research Quarterly (Vol. 25, Issue 2, pp. 166–176). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.10.004
  7. Burgess S. R., & Lonigan C. J. (1998). Bidirectional Relations of Phonological Sensitivity and Prereading Abilities: Evidence from a Preschool Sample. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 70, 117–141.
  8. Burgess, S. R., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Bidirectional relations of phonological sensitivity and prereading abilities: Evidence from a preschool sample. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 70(2), 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1998.2450
  9. Centre for Early Childhood Education and Development & Annual Status of Education Report. (2015). Indian early childhood education impactstudy. Policy Brief.
  10. Centre for Early Childhood Education and Development. (2010). Preparing teachers for early childhood care and education. New Delhi: Ambedkar University Delhi and National Council for Teacher Education..
  11. Centre for Early Childhood Education and Development. (2010). Preparing teachers for early childhood care and education. New Delhi: Ambedkar University Delhi and National Council for Teacher Education..
  12. Chambaz, C. (2001). Lone‐parent Families in Europe: A Variety of Economic and Social Circumstances. In Social Policy & Administration (Vol. 35, Issue 6, pp. 658–671). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9515.00259
  13. Claessens, Amy & Engel, Mimi. (2013). How Important Is Where You Start? Early Mathematics Knowledge and Later School Success. Teachers College Record. 115.
  14. Clements, Douglas & Sarama, Julie. (2011). Early childhood teacher education: The case of geometry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 14. 133-148. 10.1007/s10857-011-9173-0
  15. Department of Women and Child Development (DWCD)-Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD). (2005). National Plan of Action (NPA), New Delhi.
  16. Dhingra, R., & Sharma, L. (2011). Assessment of Preschool Education Component of ICDS Scheme in Jammu District. Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 11(6), 13–18. Retrieved from https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/197
  17. Dickinson, D. K., & Neuman, S. B. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2). Guilford Press.
  18. Dickinson, D. K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2010). Speaking out for language: Why language is central to reading development. Educational Researcher, 39, 305-310.
  19. Dickinson, D.K. and Neuman, S.B. (2006) Handbook of Early Literacy Research (Vol. 2). Guilford Press, New York.
  20. Dixit, S., Sakalle, S., Patel, G.S., Taneja, G. & Chourasiya, S. (2010). Evaluation of functioning of ICDS project areas under Indore and Ujjain divisions of the state of Madhya Pradesh. Online Journal of Health and Allied Sciences, 9(1), 1-5. Retrieved from http://cogprints.org/6988/1/2010-1-2.pdf
  21. Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., Pagani, L. S., Feinstein, L., Engel, M., Brooks-Gunn, J., Sexton, H., Duckworth, K., & Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
  22. Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A., Klebanov, P., ... Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental psychology, 43(6), 1428.
  23. Early Education for All. (2006). Early childhood education and school readiness. A campaign of strategies for children. Boston, Massachusetts. Retrieved from http://www.strategiesforchildren.org/ EEA.html
  24. Fan, Xitao & Chen, Michael. (2001). Parental Involvement and Students' Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. 13. 1-22. 10.1023/A:1009048817385
  25. Geary D. C. (2011). Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics: a 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental psychology, 47(6), 1539–1552. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025510
  26. Geary, D. C. (2011). Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics: A five year longitudinal study. Developmental psychology, 47(6), 1539.
  27. Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Ramineni, C., & Locuniak, M. N. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental psychology, 45(3), 850.
  28. Jordan, Nancy & Kaplan, David & Ramineni, Chaitanya & Locuniak, Maria. (2009). Early Math Matters: Kindergarten Number Competence and Later Mathematics Outcomes. Developmental psychology. 45. 850-67. 10.1037/a0014939.
  29. Josephine, Y. (2003). Convergence of DPEP with ECCE Impact of ECCE on girls enrolment and retention in primary schools: A comparative study of two states. New Delhi :Educational Administration Unit, National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration.
  30. Kaul, V., Chaudhary, A. B. & Sharma, S. (2014). Indian early childhood education impact study- 1, quality and diversity in early childhood education- A view from AndhraPradesh, Assam and Rajasthan. New Delhi : Centre for Early Childhood Education and Development, Ambedkar University Delhi.
  31. Kaul, V., Chaudhary, A. B. & Sharma, S. (2014). Indian early childhood education impact study- 1, quality and diversity in early childhood education- A view from Andhra  and Development, Ambedkar University Delhi. 
  32. Lee, J.S. and Bowen, N.K. (2006) Parent Involvement, Cultural Capital, and the Achievement Gap among Elementary School Children. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 193-218. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043002193
  33. Melhuish, E. C., Phan, M. B., Sylva, K., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (2008). Effects of the home learning environment and preschool center experience upon literacy and numeracy development in early primary school. Journal of Social Issues, 64(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00550.x
  34. Morrow, L. M. (2012). Literacy development in the early years: Promoting children's love of books and reading. Pearson
  35. National Council of Educational Research and Training. (2006). Seventh all India school education survey (7th AISES): As on 30th September, 2002. Educational Survey Division, New Delhi: NCERT .
  36. National Council of Educational Research and Training. (2016). Eighth All India School Education Survey (8th AISES): As on 30th September, 2009- A concise report. New Delhil: Educational Survey Division, NCERT.
  37. National Institute of Public Cooperation and Child Development. (2006). Three decades of ICDS- An appraisal. New Delhi :New Delhi: NIPCCD
  38. Planning Commission. (2008). Vol II, Social Sector (2008). Eleventh Five Year Plan (2007- 2012). Government of India. New Delhi:Oxford University Press.
  39. Planning Commission. (2013a). Vol III, Social Sector. Twelfth five year plan (2012-2017) Government of India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  40. Planning Commission. (2013b). Performance of Rajiv Gandhi national creche scheme for children of working mothers. New Delhi: Government of India. Retrieved from http://planningcommission.nic.in/ reports/sereport/ser/ser_RGNCreche.pdf
  41. Program. (2008). Quality assurance in early childhood care and development (ECCD) in Southeast Asia. Philippines: Regional Centre for Educational Innovation and Technology (RCEIT).
  42. Rao, N. (2010). Preschool quality and the development of children from economically disadvantaged families in India. Early Education and Development, 21(2), 167-185. Retrieved from http://hub.hku.hk/bitstream/10722/125514/1/Content.pdf?accept=1
  43. Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., Ou, S. R., Arteaga, I. A., & White, B. A. (2011). School-based early childhood education and age-28 well-being: effects by timing, dosage, and subgroups. Science (New York, N.Y.), 333(6040), 360–364. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1203618
  44. Rhode Island KIDS COUNT. (2005). Getting ready: Findings from the National School readiness indicators initiative A 17 State partnership. Rhode Island KIDS COUNT
  45. Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. Neuman & D. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook for research in early literacy (pp. 97–110). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  46. Shonkoff, J. P., & Phillips, D. A. (Eds.). (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. National Academy Press.
  47. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children. Washington DC: National Research Council.
  48. Sophian, C. (1988). Early Developments in Children’s Understanding of Number: Inferences about Numerosity and One-to-One Correspondence. Child Development, 59(5), 1397–1414. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130502
  49. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of learning disabilities, 27(5), 276–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949402700503
  50. United Nation Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2015). EFA global monitoring report 2015: Education for all 2000-2015: Achievements and challenges. France.
  51. United Nation Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2007). EFA global monitoring report 2008: Education for all by 2015-Will we make it? Paris.
  52. United Nation Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2015 May). Incheon Declaration, Education 2030: Towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning for all. Symposium conducted at the meeting of World Education, Incheon, Republic of Korea. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/ 002338/ 233813M.pdf
  53. Venugopal, K. R. (2009). Report of the social audit of ICDS programme in the district of Anantapur in the state of Andhra Pradesh. National human rights commission. Hyderabad.             Retrieved from http://www.sentinel-venugopal.in/pdf/ Draft%20Social%20Audit%20Report%20of%20ICDS%20in%20Anantapur%20AP.pdf
  54. Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The Nature of Phonological Processing and Its Causal Role in the Acquisition of Reading Skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192-212.
  55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192
  56. Woodhead, M., Ames, P., Vennam, U., Abebe, W. & Streuli, N. (2009). Equity and Quality? Challenges for early childhood and primary education in Ethiopia, India and Peru.Working Papers no. 55 in Early Childhood Development, Studies in Early Childhood Transitions. Bernard van Leer Foundation.

 

Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE) is often regarded as A key element of universal education. This study delves into the landscape of Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE) in India through a systematic review of literature. After extensive attempts, several nations throughout the world are making strides toward securing ECCE. Despite this, the majority of them were unable to reach or compromise on this aim owing to insufficient resources, bad planning, and weak strategies for implementation, particularly in a large and populated nation such as India. The development of quality standards and curriculum frameworks, plans, acts, constitutional amendments, schemes, and flagship programmes like, District Primary Education Programme (DPEP), Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) and Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan are just a few of the initiatives the Indian government has launched to improve quality. It has resulted in both anticipated and unexpected concerns and obstacles due to India's compromise on the non- negotiable ECCE quality requirements. Consequently, the government's objective of guaranteeing quality in ECCE was not fully achieved. However, recent research indicates significant advancements in quality improvements. Of course, there are unsatisfactory results in certain areas and components, but there has also been progress in other areas, suggesting that maintaining quality is a realistic objective. This research aims to present an overview of the Government of India's operations, assess the situation on the ground, pinpoint the primary hurdles to ECCE quality development and offer workable solutions to overcome those hurdles.

Keywords : Early Childhood Care and Education, Early Childhood Education, Quality Standards, Anganwadi Centres, Integrated Child Development Services

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe