Authors :
Isiaka Isah; Mohammed Sani Umar; Muhammad Masin Muhammad
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 3 - March
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/ksx6x3hk
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/2c4szm34
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25mar031
Google Scholar
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.
Abstract :
This study undertakes a comprehensive economic analysis of integrating a heat exchanger with a simple cycle
gas turbine power plant, with a specific focus on the Siemens SGT5-2000E gas turbine model. The analysis leverages on
key parameters such as Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Payback Period (PBP) and Levelized
Cost of Electricity (LCOE), to evaluate the viability and profitability of the investment. The results of the analysis show
that integrating a heat exchanger with the gas turbine power plant yields a positive NPV of N166,031,518.3, signifying that
the investment is profitable. Furthermore, the IRR is approximately 12.22 %, which is the discount rate at which the NPV
becomes zero. The payback period is determined to be 7.7 years, indicating that the investment will break-even within a
reasonable timeframe. Additionally, the levelized cost of electricity is calculated to be N65.23/kWh, which corresponds to a
discount rate of 55 %. The findings of this study provide valuable insights for investors, policymakers, and plant operators
seeking to optimize the efficiency and competitiveness of gas turbine power plants. Overall, the results suggest that
integrating a heat exchanger with a simple cycle gas turbine power plant is a viable and profitable investment opportunity.
Keywords :
Economic Analysis, Heat Exchanger, Simple Cycle Gas Turbine, Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Payback Period (PBP), Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE), Power Plant
References :
- Ali, A., Qasim, M. and Zaki, S. (2018). “Case Studies in Thermal Engineering Performance analysis of shell and tube heat exchanger : Parametric study,” Case Stud. Therm. Eng., vol. 12, pp. 563–568, doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2018.07.009.
- Patel, A. K. (2023). “Advancements in heat exchanger design for waste heat recovery in industrial processes,” vol. 19, no. 03, pp. 137–152.
- Ali, A. and Zaki, S. (2017). “Case Studies in Thermal Engineering Analysis study of shell and tube heat exchanger for clough company with reselect di ff erent parameters to improve the design,” Case Stud. Therm. Eng., vol. 10, pp. 455–467, doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2017.10.002.
- Chen, L., Surya, V., Adi, K. and Laxmidewi, R. (2022). “Case Studies in Thermal Engineering Shell and tube heat exchanger flexible design strategy for process operability,” Case Stud. Therm. Eng., vol. 37, p. 102163, doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2022.102163.
- Natesan, K. and Karinka, S. (2023). “Case Studies in Thermal Engineering A comprehensive review of heat transfer enhancement of heat exchanger , heat pipe and electronic components using graphene,” Case Stud. Therm. Eng., vol. 45, p. 102874, doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2023.102874.
- Pontevedra, Y. (2018). “Study of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger with the Effect of Types of Study of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger with the Effect of Types of Baffles of Zanin Afonso Costing models for capacity optimization in Industry 4 . 0 : Trade-off between used capacity and ,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 20, pp. 195–200, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.028.
- Silaipillayarputhur, K. and Khurshid, H. (2019). “The Design of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers – A Review,” vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 87–102.
- Franti, D. and Martin, J. (2017). “Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger – The Heat Transfer Area Design Process,” vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 13–24, doi: 10.1515/scjme-2017-0014.
- Perumal, S., Sundaresan, D., Sivanraju, R., Tesfie, N. Ramalingam, K. and Thanikodi, S. (2022). “Heat Transfer Analysis in Counter Flow Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger, ” vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 843–848.
- Mulyana, T., Suhaimi, F. N., Hanafi, D., Nor, M. and Than, M. (2011). “ARX Model of Four Types Heat Exchanger Identification,” pp. 1–5.
- F. Baina, A. Malmquist, L. Alejo, and T. H. Fransson, (2018). Analysis of a high-temperature heat exchanger for an externally-fired micro gas turbine.
- Lovaglio, N., Pina, A., Ferrão, P. Fournier, J. Lacarrière, B. and Le Corre, O. (2018). “Heat Exchanger Design and Optimization by using Genetic Algorithm for Externally Fired Micro-Turbine,” Energy Procedia, vol. 148, pp. 720–727, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2018.08.162.
- Wang, X., Chen, Q., and Xu, G. (2018). “Numerical Investigation on the Effects of Shell Diameter on Heat Transfer Performance in Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers.,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 131, pp. 531–539.
- Mishra, P. K. and Das, M. (2017). “Effect of Mass flow Rate on the Performance of a Shell and Tube Heat Exchange,” J. Therm. Sci. Eng. Appl., vol. 9, no. 2, p. 021012
- You, A., Be, M. and In, I. (2023). “Performance of A High-Temperature Particle-Based Shell-.”
- Kara, Y. A. (2003). “A computer program for designing of shell-and-tube heat exchangers,” vol. 24, pp. 1797–1805, doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2003.12.014.
- Hadidi, A., Hadidi, M. and Nazari, A. (2013). “A new design approach for shell-and-tube heat exchangers using imperialist competitive algorithm ( ICA ) from economic point of view,” vol. 67, pp. 66–74.
- Wang, S., Wen, J. and Li, Y. (2009). “An experimental investigation of heat transfer enhancement for a shell-and-tube heat exchanger,” vol. 29, pp. 2433–2438, doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.12.008.
- Chukwudi, B. C. and Ogunedo, M. B. (2018). “Design and Construction of a Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger,” vol. 118, pp. 50687–50691.
- Thet, S., Than, M., Lin, K. A. and Mon, M. S. (2008). “Heat Exchanger Design,” pp. 604–611.
- Ighodaro, O. O. and Osikhuemhe, M. (2019). “Thermo-Economic Analysis of a Heat Recovery Steam Generator Combined Cycle,” vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 342–347.
- Wang, Z. and Duan, L. (2021). “Thermoeconomic Optimization of Steam Pressure of Heat Recovery Steam Generator in Combined Cycle Gas Turbine”.
- Üst, Y., and Yildiz, H. K. K. (2014). “Thermoeconomic Analysis of Heat Recovery Steam Generators for Steam Injected Gas Turbine Cycles”.
- Eke M. N. et al., (2018). “Energy and Exergy Evaluation of a 220MW Thermal Power Plant,” vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 115–123.
- Eke, M. N., Okoroigwe, E. C., Umeh, S. I. and Okonkwo, P. (2020). “Performance Improvement of a Gas Turbine Power Plant in Nigeria by Exergy Analysis : A Case of Geregu 1,” vol. 7, pp. 1–20, doi: 10.4236/oalib.1106617.
- Egware, H. O. and Obanor, A. I. (2022). “The investigation of an SGT5-2000E gas turbine power plant performance in Benin City based on energy analysis,” Energy Convers. Manag. X, vol. 16, no. October, p. 100316, doi: 10.1016/j.ecmx.2022.100316.
- Ighodaro, O. O. and Egbon, O. C. (2021). “Comparative Performance Assessment of Different Gas Turbine Configurations : A Study of a Local Power Station in Nigeria,” vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 22–31.
- Sulaiman, A. N. M. and Waheed, A. M. A. (2017). “Techno-Economic Investigation of Different Alternatives of Improving Simple Gas Turbine Integration Options,” vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 849–857.
- Taghavi, M. Abdollahi, M. and Salehi, G. (2013). “Thermodynamic and Thermo Economic Optimization of Combined Cycle Power Plant,” vol. 1, no. 2, doi: 10.7763/IJMMM.2013.V1.40.
- Ganjehkaviri, A., Jaafar, M. N. M. P. Ahmadi, and Barzegaravval, H. (2014). “Modelling and optimization of combined cycle power plant based on exergoeconomic and environmental analyses,” vol. 67, pp. 566–578.
- MechStudies, “What are Heat Exchangers? Definition, Parts, Types, How Does It Works, Equation". Retrieved from https://www.mechstudies.com/heat-exchangers-definition-parts-types/. access on 13/02/2025.
- Reuters, “Nigeria Inflation Rate". Retrived from https://www.reuters.com. assessed on 07/02/2025.
- Stears, "CBN Monetary Policy Commitee (MPC): Interest Rate Decision". Retrieved from https://www.stears.co/article/macro-data-bulletin-nigerias-mpc-tightens-further-by-50-basis-points-in-september-2024/. assessed on 07/02/2025.
This study undertakes a comprehensive economic analysis of integrating a heat exchanger with a simple cycle
gas turbine power plant, with a specific focus on the Siemens SGT5-2000E gas turbine model. The analysis leverages on
key parameters such as Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Payback Period (PBP) and Levelized
Cost of Electricity (LCOE), to evaluate the viability and profitability of the investment. The results of the analysis show
that integrating a heat exchanger with the gas turbine power plant yields a positive NPV of N166,031,518.3, signifying that
the investment is profitable. Furthermore, the IRR is approximately 12.22 %, which is the discount rate at which the NPV
becomes zero. The payback period is determined to be 7.7 years, indicating that the investment will break-even within a
reasonable timeframe. Additionally, the levelized cost of electricity is calculated to be N65.23/kWh, which corresponds to a
discount rate of 55 %. The findings of this study provide valuable insights for investors, policymakers, and plant operators
seeking to optimize the efficiency and competitiveness of gas turbine power plants. Overall, the results suggest that
integrating a heat exchanger with a simple cycle gas turbine power plant is a viable and profitable investment opportunity.
Keywords :
Economic Analysis, Heat Exchanger, Simple Cycle Gas Turbine, Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Payback Period (PBP), Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE), Power Plant